Preview

Hsm 230 Week 9 Capstone Checkpoint

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
335 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Hsm 230 Week 9 Capstone Checkpoint
CAPSTONE CHECKPOINT

Capstone Checkpoint

Capstone Checkpoint
An issue in human services that is being mulled around in my community and state is what to do about drug and alcohol use while collecting welfare and other state benefits. The money that is meant to get the parents back on their feet and provide for the children is being grossly misused. Many people who are collecting benefit checks, food stamps, and medical benefits are unable to pass a drug test so in essence are not able to work. They seem to be able to afford cigarettes, alcohol, and drugs but run short on bills, diapers and household goods.
The dilemma is that on one hand it might be a violation of rights to ask people to be drug tested, but it’s no more intrusive than providing social security #’s, birthdates, and mother’s maiden named, or pay stubs. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, (2008) the 1996 Welfare Reform Act authorized - but did not require - states to impose mandatory drug testing as a prerequisite to receiving state welfare assistance. This is in part to the fact that some think that testing people for drug use is a violation of their civil rights.
The big question is should people be allowed to collect benefits from the state if they are misusing the money for drugs? If the person cannot pass a drug test to get benefits they cannot pass one for a job. This means they have no intention of getting a job in the first place unless they are forced. If the people are not working they get lazier and more likely to produce more children. I would side on testing, because if the money is used for the purpose it was intended for most people will not mind but those who use have an issue.

References
American Civil Liberties Union, (2008). Drug testing welfare recipients. Retrieved August 18, 2010 from



References: American Civil Liberties Union, (2008). Drug testing welfare recipients. Retrieved August 18, 2010 from http://www.aclu.org/drug-law-reform/drug-testing-public-assistance-recipients-condition-eligibility

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Whether or not a drug test is required by recipients of welfare has been questioned time and time again by many states. In the article "No drug test, no welfare", Kimberly Yee expands upon on this question by explaining what her stand point is on the many advantages of drug testing for welfare. In this particular article, Ms. Yee does not sufficiently argue her position on the subject of welfare recipients taking drug test to receive benefits.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ok, let's all look at this as realistically as we can; if just 1 person failed a drug test for the welfare, that's a whole extra few hundred dollars per month that our government can save, and that's only for 1 person! A typical drug test cost around $10 for the cheaper ones. That's store price too, that's not considering what government contracter bulk…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug testing welfare recipients has been a major topic across the United States for a few years now. Many argue that if working class people are subject to a test prior to hire or randomly during the length of employment, why should those that don’t have to work for money not have the same treatment? Invasion of privacy is a huge disadvantage on the government’s part, yes it is free money but that doesn’t entitle anyone, even government, to control every aspect of your life or hold it constantly over a person’s head until they feel guilt or just flat decline assistance. Let’s ask ourselves just one question; if you went to the bank for a car loan, being this is a necessity for everyday living to own, how would you feel if they asked you to take a drug test prior to lending you the money? I feel many peoples’ tune would change drastically.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The need for welfare among society today has become increasingly large. Although the need for welfare is rapidly increasing, so is the use of drugs. This is posing as a major problem for the welfare programs. Welfare programs are now trying to put into place a new qualification where any possible recipients of welfare are required to take a drug test. For the most part, welfare recipients respect the requirements of their contract with the agency. The drug testing will just be used to eliminate any persons taking advantage of the welfare program for inappropriate use and to ensure that the welfare will go to the people who are actually in need of it. While many are more than willing to take the drug tests, there are also quite a few who are very reluctant toward this new qualification. In order to decide whether or not drug testing is a logical and fair requirement, all the pros and cons need to be laid out on the table.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Public Assistance is government aid to needy, aged, or disabled persons and to dependent children (Merriam-Webster Dictionary). All public assistance applicants should be required to take a mandatory drug test before they can qualify to receive any form of public assistance. Drug tests can detect a number of different illegal substances like, marijuana, steroids, amphetamines, cocaine, PCP, and opiates. “More than 22 million Americans age 12 and older - nearly 9% of the U.S. population - use illegal drugs, according to the government’s 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health”(CNN). One should never feel they are entitled to public assistance, it should be felt as more of a privilege. Sadly, in the last ten years, our economy has unfortunately depreciated rapidly. The economy is so bad at this point, that it can be very difficult to find employment. For some, it can be impossible, especially if uneducated. The result is that more people, now than ever, are applying for public assistance. The amount of public assistance being paid for food stamps, and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) is so high, it is imperative that we find a way to fix this situation to prevent so many people from taking advantage of something others in this world so desperately need and rely on to survive, not to feed their addictions.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When considering effective ways to cut government spending, each state should start requiring mandatory drug testing among all its welfare recipients. Cutting welfare benefits to known drug abusers will allow benefits to be doled out more effectively and efficiently to those Americans that are truly in need, diminish drug use in those poverty stricken communities that tend to rely on welfare assistance and take a chunk from the government’s out of control spending.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Out of Class Essay 2

    • 1043 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is controversy about using drug testing for welfare recipients to identify drug addict over states in the United States, and still there are many concerns, so just few states apply it. Still there are a lot of different opinions about it for instance Kasha Kelly, The Kansas state House representative, in Michelle Price’s “2012-2013 data shows only 12 test positive in Utah welfare drug screening” believes that checking people on public assistance for drugs would not only save money, they argue, but put welfare recipients on firmer footing when they get ready to enter the working world. But, Liz Schott, a welfare expert with center on Budget and Policy Priorities, in Alan Greenblatt’s “Should Welfare Recipients Get Drug Testing?” argues testing violated the constitutional ban against unreasonable search and seizure. In my opinion, California should test welfare applicants for drugs because it saves money, it helps abusers, and it is constitutional…

    • 1043 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major debates going on in states all over the United States today is whether people receiving welfare benefits should undergo drug testing to qualify. Critics argue that it is discrimination and unconstitutional, but it is requiring no more than almost any job that you apply for that requires you to pass a drug test in order to qualify for that job and benefits. As of now, the only thing that you must show in order to qualify for government assistance is that you are below the income requirements. I think that this encourages more citizens to not work, have children, and live off of the working citizens in America. I think that initial and random drug testing should be mandatory in all states for anyone who is applying for or currently receiving welfare benefits. This would ensure that precious taxpayer dollars are going to those truly in need.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory drug testing for welfare recipients is right and reasonable in order to stop the habitual offenders of misusing this benefit. Are the hard working drug tested tax payers ready to support this law since it’s the hard earned tax dollars that fund these benefits? The argument stands to reason that we need to take control as employers to stop the misuse of benefits that pay for illegal drugs. Mandatory Drug Testing for Welfare. Recipients Government assistance, or welfare, is a very broad term. There are many different welfare programs available in the United States e.g., food stamps, cash assistance, and government housing. Currently there is mass debate, in courtrooms across the U.S., regarding the legality and morality of pre-assistance drug testing. This report is intended to familiarize the reader with the history of welfare reform; the histories of drug testing in regards to assistance eligibility; and persuade the audience to vote yes for mandatory pre-assistance drug testing.Welfare began during the great depression in the 1930’s then, just like now, there were many families that needed help from the government, and that is why they introduced welfare. In our world today there is social welfare, corporate welfare, child welfare, and many others that one can apply for. Other welfare programs, such as TANF and WIC, have truly made a difference in the lives of American families. Families are kept together, children are healthier and often times, recipients are able to use the welfare to help them as they find a new job. In some cases, welfare might even save lives. But, of course, the system has its flaws, and many argue that tax payer dollars are being wasted. Some citizens believe that recipients of welfare should undergo mandatory drug testing.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Shouldn’t you have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check since I have to pass one to earn it for you?” That’s the question many, hardworking Americans are asking themselves. In today’s America, government aid is highly depended on. The US government has spent $498 billion dollars this year on welfare alone. Mandatory drug testing for welfare applicants is becoming a popular idea across the U.S. Many states including Alabama, Kentucky, Oklahoma and Louisiana are considering adopting laws that would require states to drug test welfare applicants.…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    My answer and my honest opinion about the subject is that I believe it is perfectly fine to drug test welfare recipients in order for them to receive their government assisted checks. Do I believe that this is constitutional? Yes, yes I do. The reason being is that why should any other hard working American go through a drug screening in order to work and receive his or her hard earned check. As of today in 48 states, there is no law stating that welfare recipients should be subject to drug testing. It’s plain and simple, if a person can afford drugs on a regular basis, why should that person get free money? Some people feel that drug testing recipients is unconstitutional, and that is strips people of their rights. I believe in order for people to get help, they should comply with the rules and regulations to get the benefits of welfare. If that’s a problem for some people, there is no one forcing them to apply and get help.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    “With 4, 300,000 people, roughly 4.1% of the American population on welfare, the government annually spends about 132 billion dollars on welfare, which does not include either food stamps or unemployment insurance.” (DOHHS, 2012). Since the 1930s, many forms of welfare have been assisting the needy families and less fortunate of the society. However, within the past few years or so, there have been actions made to start drug testing recipients of welfare, potentially altering the whole concept of welfare. Although, only 3 states, as of now, have actually made it a law, “getting welfare and food stamps may become tougher as twenty three states around the country seek to adopt stricter laws that would require public aid recipients to take drug tests.” (Alcindor, 2012).…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Companies want their employees drug free in order to receive a paycheck. Welfare recipients should also be drug free to receive their benefits. It is a normal part of life to be drug free. On the other hand, drug testing for welfare has its cons. To start with, some people may feel discriminated. Although there are many people who are drug tested in order to have a job, not everyone is. Making everyone eligible for welfare undergo drug testing could be considered discrimination against the poor, based on the assumption that they are a drug user just because they don’t make a lot of money. The biggest con against trust testing for welfare, is that if one loses their benefits, the child of the person will lose them too. By requiring drug testing of parents who are on welfare and not receiving direct benefits, there could be a lot of children who won’t receive benefits that they may rightly deserve under the law. Chances are if a parent is buying drugs, the child is not receiving the amount they deserve. If a parent can not manage their drug addiction, they may possibly put their child at risk for malnourishment, or even abuse. If that is the case, and a parent is unfit and incompetent, they should lose all…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug Testing for Welfare

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since its creation in 1939, America's food stamp program has helped families in need. Other welfare programs, such as TANF and WIC, have truly made a difference in the lives of American families. Families are kept together, children are healthier and often times, recipients are able to use the welfare to help them as they find a new job. Yet every system has its flaws, and many argue that tax payer dollars are being wasted. I believe that recipients of welfare should submit to mandatory drug testing. Welfare recipients accept millions of American dollars in aid every year. It would only be fair for them to be tested to ensure the assistance is dispersed properly. Also, many places of employment practice random drug testing. If it happens in the workforce, why would it be unfair for welfare recipients?…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Taking away money from a citizen that tested positive for drugs would unfairly punish their children, who are innocent and didn’t choose to have the parents they were born to. 81.5% of assistance recipients in Oklahoma are children (Richey), which means that many children could suffer immensely because of their parent’s actions. If a person on welfare were to test positive for drugs and their funds were to be taken away, their children would lose their entire source of income, which would mean they would suffer infinitely more than they already did. The kids born to drug addicts would have no lunch money or clothes for school while alcoholics’ children still received funds. This would be extremely hypocritical and it is cruel to disadvantage children that already have the odds stacked against them. Living in poverty could cause them to do poorly in school and possibly turn to drugs…

    • 1218 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays