A federal judge has ruled that commercial drones are legal, stating that the Federal Aviation Administration has not issued an enforceable regulatory rule that governs commercial drone operation. The FAA plans to appeal the decision. In 2012, Congress told the Agency to implement a plan to integrate drones into the National Airspace by 2015. Shortly after, EPIC joined by over 100 other organizations, experts, and members of the public petitioned the FAA to address privacy as part of the integration.…
The terrorist attacks against America on September 11th, 2001 have dramatically changed the way in which America safeguards herself.…
Drones are starting to appear everywhere in today’s society, whether it be for commercial use or governmental use. Having this new found technology leads to the matter of the limitations of the usage of a drone, as in air safety, privacy of the people, and security. The consensus says that drones are for the better because of their diverseness and mobility. Although the argument has been made that drones will lead to a less private lifestyle and that the government will be able to track citizens and watch their every move. Drones should be sold to the public but regulated by the government because they are extremely mobile and they are reliable.…
The Patriot Act was enacted in October 2001 shortly after attacks from terrorists on the United States on September 11, 2001. The act gives Federal officials and state agencies greater authority and tools to investigate and track suspected terrorists with the goal of bringing them to trial.…
Drones can cause people to become terrorist. The people becoming terrorist most likely have had a loved one either die or be injured from a drone attack. As Amnesty International said, ”drone strikes can be classified as “war crimes” or illegal “extrajudicial executions.’” (Source K 9) Drones may also not hit the right target either, but drones are not meant to hit each and every target spot on. The people controlling the drones are not perfect and are allowed…
No less than fifteen to twenty years ago, the idea of drones peeping in on our phone calls, text messages, and e-mails was unheard of, but today, according to the director of the FBI, Robert Mueller, as of June 19, 2013 states the government has been using drones to spy in the U.S. but made clear, “the operations of drones is very seldom.” The transformation of drones into surveillance methods is evolving rapidly, increasing the publics concerns of invasions of privacy and violations of civil liberties. The Federal Aviation Administration certified the first two types of civilian drones in July of this year, which was a significant event for Congress. The FAA is currently seeking six testing sites for drones, resulting in a main step in entering the skies of America with unmanned surveillance drones.…
Mankind used to be bound to the ground of Earth and it stood on the ground for a long time, but soon enough it found the ability to fly. The power of flight grants us new technologies to fill our needs. One of these new technologies gives us an extra pair of eyes and ears. These new creations are called drones. Drones solve many problems in the USA, but they also create some other problems as well. They can provide transportation of goods over the air and provide views from above for ground survey. However people complain that drones could invade people right to privacy. Having done extensive research on the subject of Drones, I believe that drones will do more good than harm. Even though many people fear that drones could threaten privacy in the US, but with proper regulations put into place, drones can…
The main concern involving surveillance by drones is the curiousness of who is on the other side. For example, in the article “Drone Home,” Lev Grossman points out the major questions and concerns’ that comes to mind when being watched by drones. He states that “you’re dealing with someone who is both present and absent, who has decided that what they say or do will have consequences for you but not for them” (Grossman 31). In this one sentence Grossman discusses the major issue and concern involving the entrance of drones into the society. This statement made by the author points out the helplessness that people face when being watched by devices like drones with no hint of who is on the other…
Katz v. United States (1967) guides our inquiry, and that case renders the drone surveillance consistent with the Fourth Amendment. In Katz, the Court held that covertly recording calls made in a public telephone booth violates the Fourth Amendment. Katz is relevant to the instant case because it sets forth…
The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism act of 2001 otherwise known as the USA Patriot Act was signed into law by president George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. This act is part of the foreign and defense policy area. “The foreign and defense policy area includes organizations that focus on relations between the United States and the rest of the world. Organizations that national security initiatives and other defense-related policies, as well as individual countries, are included.” This act was enacted by the 107th United States congress. It was introduced to the house of representatives by a republican representative named Jim Sensenbrenner on October 23, 2001 and passed…
In the case Ciraolo v. California, the US Supreme Court declared aerial surveillance around homes is legal. Despite the fact that the drone flew through the window in the house through three rooms of the home. This violates the Fourth Amendment by not having a warrant to search with a drone.…
McKay, J. (2005). Patriot Act 's tools no different than those used to fight crime. Retrieved from http://seattletimes.com/html/opinion/2002331932_johnmckay13.html.…
Forty-five days after the September 11 terrorist attacks on the United States, Congress passed the US PATRIOT Act, also known as the “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism” Act, or more simply, the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act was created with the noble intention of finding and prosecuting international terrorists operating on American soil; however, the unfortunate consequences of the Act have been drastic. Many of the Patriot Act’s provisions are in clear violation of the U.S. Constitution—a document drafted by wise men like Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington in order to protect American rights and freedoms. The Patriot Act encroaches on sacred First Amendment rights, which protect free speech and expression, and Fourth Amendment rights, which protect citizens against “unwarranted search and seizure”.…
Elliot, Philip. “Gates Backs Lawmakers’ Oversight of Drone Program.” USNews.com. 11 Feb. 2013. Web. 19 Sept. 2012.…
In the aftermath of September 11, Congress was eager to put laws on the books to prevent another attack. In an unprecedented spirit of bipartisan patriotism, a law was passed in the House by 357 to 66 (Clerk of the House) and in the Senate by 98 to 1 (Secretary of the Senate). The title of the act, USA PATRIOT Act, is an acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. Since its historic passage there has been much debate on the constitutionality of the act. Some would claim the Legislative and Executive branches acted opportunistically and enacted a law that infringes on the rights of Americans. This paper, for sake of brevity, focuses on Section 213 of the Patriot Act, the “sneak and peak” section. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the arguments on both sides of the issues and determine whether or not Section 213 of the USA PATRIOT Act is indeed unconstitutional. This paper examines the history of the Patriot Act, evaluates recent litigation concerning this act, and considers precedents that would give or withhold from Congress the authority to enact such a law.…