Preview

Do Your Family And Friends Use Consequential, Or Virtue Theories?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
905 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do Your Family And Friends Use Consequential, Or Virtue Theories?
To what extent do you believe that members of your family or your friends use consequential, nonconsequential, and virtue theory?
The consequential theory is when a person is concerned what the consequences would be after they do something or make a choice that was not right. Consequential theory is the nature of a secondary result, meaning that it can have significant consequences. “The two major consequentialist ethical theories are ethical egoism and utilitarianism” (Otto, 2014, p. 30). These two theories state that people should act in ways that bring good consequences. Both ethical egoism and utilitarianism do differ in the fact that they do disagree on who exactly should benefit from consequences. The ethical egoism says that people
…show more content…
This is because people know what they are doing when they are judging people and acting virtuously. People should act in particular ways but also while feeling these ways so they can emphasize the creation of a virtuous character within themselves. “The idea is to decide what the practically wise and virtuous human being would do in any situation involving moral choice, and then do likewise” (Otto, 2014, p. 68). One example from consequential theory that works for them is the Universal Ethical Egoism. This is because they would do what was in the best interest for everyone not just for themselves. “This theory does not state only what the individual should do; rather, it concerns itself with what all human beings should do if they want to be moral” (Otto, 2014, p.33). This theory says to act in your own self-interest which can ring true especially if you always do what is right and what you believe is the right thing to do. An example of a nonconsequential theory that would not work for my family or friends is the divine command theory because it can be hard not to judge someone as being moral or immoral especially when they are making bad choices that can hurt others or themselves. Everyone believes in something different and that includes god. Most people would not buy that you acted in such a way because God told you to do so. When it comes to certain things, yes we absolutely look to a higher power, but not when faced with the choice to do something right or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Even though Deontology and Consequentialism can be extremely similar, both contain key factors that make each idea unique and very different. Sometimes, it may appear that both these theories simply arrive at the same conclusion by way of different paths. While this is sometimes true, it is important to understand how these theories differ. Each of these braches of Ethics deals with morals, actions, ethical decisions and judgments. Beyond the surface though, each of these Ethical ideas begin to differ greatly. Deontology is the theory and/or idea that judges the morality of an action based on the action’s adherence to the overall rules. Consequentialism is the theory and/or idea that the morality should be judged on the action’s overall outcome or consequences. Both theories judge morality. However, Deontology judges morality based on the actions themselves, while Consequentialism judges morality based on the end reaction. Out of these two ethical theories I believe Consequentialism to be least likely to be false.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A consequentialist theory which one decides an ethical decision should maximize benefits to society and minimize harms.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Consequentialists make decisions based upon the consequences of their decision. The consequences to operate their business by placing employees on weight probation, even though there is a law in the state of Michigan that makes such an act illegal, outweighed any possible lawsuit that may arise. The company obviously believes that a lawsuit that may happen is less costly that to operate their business in accordance with the state’s laws.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Adultery Wrong

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page

    Another problem with consequentialism is that the theory maintains that wrongness and rightness are not found in the action itself, but in the ramifications of it. The absurdity of this claim can be best seen with an example; adultery isn’t wrong in itself, but it is wrong when harmful effects are the result. More specifically, adultery is wrong if it causes the spouse harm, but morally correct if the result is a stronger marriage and a deeper connection. Calling adultery moral reveals the folly of consequentialism, and yet another reason why the moral rightness of an action cannot be determined by its corresponding consequences.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On the other hand, a non-consequentialist believes that an act is either intrinsically good or intrinsically bad, independent of its consequence. Hence, punishment should instead serve as a form of retribution such that only the guilty should be punished accordingly, where he or she is inflicted the same harm or suffering that they deserve.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The difference between these three approaches to morality tends to lie more in the way moral dilemmas are approached than in the moral conclusions reached. The perfect example would be people argue that lying is wrong because of the negative consequence produced by lying. However, consequentialists may allow that certain foreseeable consequences might make lying acceptable.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consequentiality normative principles require that we first tally both the good and bad consequences of an action. Second, we then determine whether the total good consequences outweigh the total bad consequences. If the good consequences are greater, then the action is morally proper. If the bad consequences are greater, then the action is morally improper.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Theories Chart

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    | |consequentialism, which advocates that|good or bad to begin with regardless what |follow and instead focus on helping people|…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Egoism—specifically ethical egoism—argues that our moral evaluations should be made in terms of our desires and goals. Something that promotes what I want is regarded as right; something that interferes with what I want, or prevents me from reaching my goals, is regarded as wrong.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act consequentialism supports the idea that actions are made right or wrong based solely on their consequences. This means that a person would look to the consequences of a certain action to determine whether or not that action is right or wrong. A ‘right’ action would be one that leads to the best results where as a ‘wrong’ action would be one with less than ideal consequences. According to this basic theory, one would always choose the ‘right’ action because it leads to the most favorable consequences. Though this theory can sound appealing, I do not agree fully that actions are determined solely based on consequences. I think that everyone has their own set of moral ethics or values and these can affect whether or not a person sees a particular action as ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. One definition of…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Intro To Ethics

    • 2258 Words
    • 6 Pages

    a. Morality as consequences: People, who do something for the sole purpose that their action has a positive consequence or outcome, are called consequentialists. There only fault is they each believe there consequence is correct.…

    • 2258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall, consequentialism is a plausible theory that could very easily be unsuccessful in society. The theory has the greatest intentions, creating a world full of goodness and impacting as many people as possible, but it would be difficult for the theory to exist if not everyone was on board. Without support, the theory would have a difficult time benefiting everyone equally. However, those who practice consequentialism will make an impact on the world, and that impact is the thing people will…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This theory decides where the goodness is in our consequences (280). This viewpoint contemplates the potential advantage or disadvantage that comes with the consequences. Humans decide whether the ends justify the means. Therefore, when weighing the consequences with the reason why one did something it's an example of the teleological theory. According to the deontological theory, morality is the act of carrying out obligations, it has nothing to do with the consequences. Through this outlook, maintaining a law or rule is something one must do to be morally right (281). The morality of a rule is impartial to whatever advantage it gave, it's decided by whether the rule was obeyed. For example, a man robs a bank and harms several people in the process to fund their child's life-saving operation. From the deontological stance, this action is morally wrong. Breaking into a bank is a federal offense also, harming and stealing from others is breaking two moral rules. Since this person broke the federal law and broke moral rules they are in the wrong, no matter how someone else benefits from this. The nobility of an action does not matter, only if an absolute moral rule was disobeyed…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Ethical Egoism

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Theory of ethical egoism is a moral theory that is about how an action is done for our own best interest. It’s deciding what’s most favorable for me that’ll benefit my own interest. It’s putting one’s own welfare first. Ethical egoism is also seen as for example as performing actions of good deed to someone else where at the end you’re promoting your self-interest. Though you’re thinking of your own self-interest you’re still making sure that what you do is done wisely and have considered any long term effects that may come along.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays