Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Death Penalty for or Against

Good Essays
709 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Death Penalty for or Against
The death penalty is one of the highest punishments of many Governments in the world. Some people believe that it is a violation of human right while others consider it a prevention of crimes. Personally, I am strongly agree with the latter.
The death penalty, first of all, is benificial to society's security. Thanks to their fear of the strictest punishment, hardened criminals give up their harmful intentions such as killing or causing crimes. In addition, never do normal people dream of worry about violence that may put in their deprive them of freedom and make themlives danger. As a result, that/ the practice of capital punishment leads to a sharp drop in crime rate.
Moreover, the assistance for economies is another advantage of applying the death penalty. After applying/imposing this kind of punishment, goverment may spend little financial resource on prison construction, prisoner nurture, and other related expenses. Therefore, they will have more budgets to develop key industries. Not only are there fewer economic losses related to criminals but also the economies may grow sustainablydue to citizen's safety feeling.
To conclude, although there are some disadvantages of usage, the death penalty gives our society many advantages including both economy and security benefits. Therefore, the death penalty is absolutely reasonable in our society.

Death penalty, first of all, is to have a positive (has positive effect) on social security; with the rate of crime reduce (reducing) from 25% to 10% in Vietnam (Câu này diễn đạt không thoát ý, bạn có thể tách thành 2 câu, 1 câu topic và một câu support, như vậy bài của bạn vừa trông dài hơn, vừa dễ hiểu nhé) Another advantage of death penalty is (to) effect on economy. (tối nghĩa) Government does not expense so much for (expend too much money on) building prisons, feeding them and providing them with good facilities. In Vietnam, the death penalty’s implementation (the sentence of capital punishment) to serious crimes such as a crime related of (to) drug, murder crimes,….No soonerthe death penalty is implemented do children raise their awareness and warnings. (No sooner is the death penalty implemented than children are aware of what they should do) It is high time that people responsible (that people were responsible) for their actions. Finally, death penalty is a effective deterrentmeasures (measure) to prevent dangerous crimes repeat offernse (what is this) and protecting (protect)public safety

The punishment for criminals is always concerned in order to better society (one of the most concerned matters of the society). Some people believe that death penalty is benefical for (beneficial to) social security while others claim that it is not humanitarian and unfair when executing it. Not once do I think that it is necessary to do (use) death penalty.

First, death penaly is not effective to reduce crime rate. With death penalty done (applied), criminals are afraid to be (of being) punished, causing (and try to create) more forms and methods of crime, which is a contributor of becoming more difficult to arrest them (to more difficulties in arresting them). For example, states in the United States (some states of the United States) that do not employ the death penalty generally have lower murder rates than states that do.

Futhermore, it is benifical (beneficial) for economy without death penalty (not using death penalty is beneficial to the economy). No sooner are prisoners killed than their families including children and the old (old people – the old chỉ người già nói chung còn câu này chỉ muốn nói tới những người lớn tuổi trong gia đình) are catalysts for bigger welfare burden. On the contrary, with death penalty disappearing(rejected), criminals could (can) have chance to compensate (for) their mistakes which have broughtdisadvantages for society and become cheap labor to serve (the) community. As a stark example, in Vietnam, a lot of prisons educated (after being educated, many prisoners) turned back community, took care of themselves, their families and become helpful for society.
(thống nhất về thì của động từ, nên dùng hiện tại -> turn back to the community, take care of their families and become helpful for the society)

In conclusion, only by removing death penalty can (the) society embark on the journey to subtainable(sustainable) development.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a very controversial topic that some may oppose while others assent. I have read two interesting essays about the death penalty. One is entitled “The Penalty of Death” by H.L Mencken and the other “Execution” by Anna Quindlen. Both authors presented their arguments and used great points to support their opinions. H.L Mencken is for the death penalty while Anna Quindlen is against it. After reading these two authors work I was able to form my own opinion on this punishment. I condone the death penalty despite how cruel it may be.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty curtails violent crime rate. For example, a sex offender gets released from jail after two and a half years with good behavior,…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is an extremely vital way of the criminal justice system. The punishment of death can help decrease crime rates. Also, this way of death can lessen the amount of criminals and give families closure. It gives closure because, the families now know that this person will never be able to hurt them or anyone else ever again. The death penalty is a very good way to end many troubles within the U.S.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another benefit of the death penalty is that it decreases crime. A study was done in states where the death penalty was enacted and for every execution, 14 people are deterred from committing a murder each year (Muhlhausen). When criminals see the high form of punishment murders receive, they are fearful of what consequences they would face if they performed a similar violent crime.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People also believe that the death penalty is a deterrent to criminals, the most powerful weapon to prevent the crime occurred. But the fact is the death penalty compared with other kinds of punishment, the death penalty does not deter crime has a special function. Offenders can be divided into two categories: Impulsive type and plan type. For impulsive, they are in the non-rational state at the time of crime, reckless commission of a crime, the death penalty cannot afford deterrent for them. For the plan type, there are too many elements need priorities than death, such as Benefits available on crime, criminal attitude towards his life and so on. Thus, the deterrent effect of the death penalty not prominent than other kinds of punishment. As some homicide, injury, rape, crimes were mostly due to some conflicts or situations stimulation, so that the loss of reason, impulsive, and at the moment committed a crime. In this case, the perpetrators are often impossible to accurately discretionary legal consequences of his crime may cause. For these people, the death penalty deterrence can be said too late to play. Furthermore, most of these people will regret afterward, in fact, sentenced these people to death runs counter to repentance, even those who escaped will continue to stimulate criminal psychology. According to studies, many murderers have that idea after killed first person: "kill one person is dead, kill more people is dead too, so it's ok to kill more.” So the death penalty maybe is an indirect stimulation of the…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is something that has many countries in the world divided. In my opinion, I believe that the death penalty should be legal throughout the country. There are many reasons as to why the death penalty should be legalized in the country including retribution, deterrence, and morality. Also, because opposing arguments do not hold up, I will discredit the ideas that the death penalty is not constitutional, irreversible mistakes are made, and that race and income will face disproportionality.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In conclusion, violent crimes and murder are inexusable and people who commit these crimes should be adequately punished and removed from society, but the death penalty has too many flaws such as being morally wrong, being carried out inhumanely, the execution of innocent people and the huge financial cost to our society. With all of these reasons, I do not agree with the death…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have to take away how i feel and base my opinion on my morals. I do not think it is humane to use the death penalty as a form of punishment. It goes against what i think of as being morally right. Killing someone to teach people that killing is wrong does not work, It's hypocritical. In the article by Mary E. Williams she makes a very good point. “To this cycle of retributive vengeance there is no end. In the words of Mohandas Gandhi, "An eye for an eye makes the whole world…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people are against the killing of others for any reasons. Other people feel that certain crimes should be punished by death. The death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of years, because people's life is at risk. The reviewing the numbers of facts prove that the death penalty should not be enforced. I think death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment. It should be abolished in this country it's racial discrimination, the financial cost and barbarity.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a method that the justice system uses to punish wrong doers for centuries, but as of late has become a hot issue of debate. There are many reasons that surround the debate of the death penalty one of them being due to the harshness of the punishment itself. People against the death penalty argue that the death penalty is a violation of the 8th amendment due to it being a cruel and an unusual punishment. Others argue that it is not. Some argue if the cost of the death penalty is worth it while others argue that it is. Although both have their own views, in the end, the death penalty is nonetheless a useless tool for safety.…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paper

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty in the United States is inflicted upon criminals by the state as punishment for an offence. This method of punishment dates back to the beginning of recorded history. Various primitive tribal histories indicate that the death penalty was a part of many ancient justice systems (Wikipedia). Nowadays, it is primarily used in cases where someone commits murder. Some people think that capital punishment deters crime and prevents convicted criminals from committing greater offences, but this idea is false. It has been debated for a long time because it is a poor way of punishing murderers. Execution in the United States violates human rights and is not the most effective way to inflict justice. Examination proves this point. The death penalty clearly violates human rights, is not an effective means of preventing other crimes and is very expensive.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays