Preview

dbq essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
438 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
dbq essay
In present-day times, the American political system is most frequently associated with the ongoing issues between political parties. Two major political parties that formed during the 1790s were The Democratic-Republicans (Anti Federalist party) led by Thomas Jefferson, and the Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton. But several years ago these political parties did not exist and many of the leaders were pleased they didn’t. George Washington warned America’s people of the dangers of these separate parties in “The Farewell Address” an excerpt as shown in Document 4. He believed that political parties would divide our country and kindle animosity. Even though many tried to oppose them, political parties still began to rise. What lead to the rise of these political parties was the different views on the government, how to interpret the Constitution. The Federalists consisted of powerful and wealthy people, they were mostly lawyers businessmen and bankers. The Democratic Republicans on the other hand consisted of common people such as farmers. Both of the parties had different views on the government. Hamilton and the Federalist Party believed in a strong federal government while the Democratic Republicans believed in strong state rights. In document two Alexander Hamilton states that James Madison and Thomas Jefferson are dangerous to the new government; that they have a “womanish attachment to France and a womanish resentment against Great Britain.” Jefferson, on the other hand, had a different view about Hamilton. Jefferson stated in document one that Hamilton was a monarchist and only wanted to help his wealthy friends. Jefferson also thought that the Federalists were all aristocrats and monocrat as stated in document five. The Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans also had different views about how to interpret the Constitution. The Federalists had a loose interpretation of the Constitution and thought it was flexible.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Essay

    • 304 Words
    • 1 Page

    Constitution. The Federalist interpretation of the Constitution was that it was flexible and that the…

    • 304 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalists, as founded by John Adams and Alexander Hamilton who persist in faith like there should be a strong central government and loose view of constitution. It means they regard anything not forbidden in the constitution is allowed for federalist government. Dealing with foreign countries, they prefer trading and communicating with Britain since they have one of the world’ most powerful navy which is convenient for import and export. They also raised up the idea of forming a national bank which is favored by the businessman. Their military policy of large peacetime army is opposed to Democratic republicans that peacetime army should be small. For other policies, democratic republicans favored weak central government and strict view of…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two conflicting interpretations of the constitution from the Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans helped shape and form the two standing parties in the U.S. by creating opinions on still standing topics in America. The Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans helped build what is now the Republicans and the Democratic parties we have in America now. Looking back on the Federalist views from the era of 1789-1800 they are very similar to what the Republicans believe in now. You can see the parralism of many ideas including thoughts on immagration and goverment regulation, as many in the Republican party do now, the Federalist support limiting immigrants. As well as the federalist the Democractic-Republicans have helped form the Democratic…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists were firm believers in the production of a strong central government and a broad interpretation of the Constitution. However, the Democratic Republicans believed that the government should follow a strict interpretation of the Constitution and held the idea that this would allow honest representation of the people and prevent government corruption.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CE DBQ essay

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Four Black girls were killed sending show waves through the country fifty years ago Sunday, it was a tragedy that blew the topic of racism wide open.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Essay

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    World War I has a debatable issue about how the war was started. Some believe that each nation started it equally but I believe it was from a different cause. Austria-Hungary’s harsh act against Serbia and Germany’s unneeded declaration of war against Russia and France actually cause World War I. Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia to quickly and then Germany declared wars on nations because it was “defending itself” even though it just wanted to gain more territories and use its large military. These rash acts caused the whole world to plummet into the largest war man had ever seen.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist and the Democratic Republican parties, respectively. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, advocated the importance of a strong central government in leading the country forward, while the Democratic Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson, promoted increasing the common man’s role in government. Although both political parties had good intentions for the future of the United States, the Federalist Party was much more effective at uniting the American people, avoiding domestic faction, and keeping the best interests in mind for the future of the United States.…

    • 5544 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander Hamilton was a federalist who believed in a strong central government. Thomas Jefferson was a democratic republican who wanted states to have strong power. Hamilton and Jefferson were competing to get their way. Hamilton point of view was best for America. Hamilton want the best for the country not for himself, he wanted to help bring upon a good strong federal government, and he thought that Jefferson was to dangerous for the country.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DBQ essay

    • 1665 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2. What terms in the question need to be defined ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Document A - Geography Document Analysis l. When Alexander and his army invaded Asia in 334 BCE, where did they first meet serious Persian resistance ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2. How many times does the city name Alexandria appear on the map ______________________________________________________________________________ 4. How can you use the map to argue that Alexander was great ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5. How can you use the map to argue that Alexander was not great ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Document B Historians Account (Note Lucius Flavius Arrianus, the historian of the next document was known as Arrian, and was a Greek philosopher and historian who lived some 400 years after the time of Alexander. His book is considered the best account of Alexanders reign) Alexander pitched camp on the bank of the Hydaspes (hay-das-pees_ and Porus was to be seen on the other bank with his whole army and his forces of elephants. He realized that he could not cross at the point where Porus was encampedhis elephants were too numerous. . . When Alexander saw this, he decided to move his troops in all different directions so that Porus would keep puzzled. . . At night he would take most of his cavalry to various points along the…

    • 1665 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the beginning of the nineteenth century, the Republicans and Federalists had developed into two distinct political parties. The controversy over the constitutionality of the First Bank of the United States gave rise to two different interpretations of the Constitution. While the Jeffersonian Republicans held a strict-constructionist view of the Constitution, the Federalists took on a broad-constructionist view of the Constitution. These became defining characteristics of the two political parties. However, during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, the desire of one party to dominate over the other caused both parties to stray away from their original philosophies of government and resort to the other party’s principles. Although the Republicans and Federalists largely stayed true to their respective interpretations of the Constitution, they increasingly embraced the other party’s principles to achieve their goals between 1801 to 1817.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mules vs. Elephants

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages

    As George Washington retired from his presidential position in 1796, he left a grim reminder to the people of the newly independent United States of America: the independence of states, peace at home and abroad, safety, prosperity, and liberty are all dependent upon the unity between states. To promote the national strength, he urges the people to place their identity as Americans above those of their state, region, and interests. In fear of the impeding sectionalism, Washington included a fair warning to the people of the United States, the dangers of political parties to the government and the country as a whole. The idea of political parties, although warned thoroughly by our very first president, continuously solidified itself into the core of American government until it has become two standing pillars of modern politics: the Democratic Mules and its counterpart, the Republican Elephants. In 21st century politics, these two reigning parties, both having changed and altered their focus over time, have maintained a core value system, ideas beliefs, and key constituencies, which are made apparent throughout political campaigns; no better evidence than the 2012 political party platforms articulates the political position which each party represents.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DBQ Essay

    • 2260 Words
    • 10 Pages

    2Read the prompt. Determine what sort of evidence you will have to find in the documents based on the prompt…

    • 2260 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans like a lot of the same things? Well, they actually didn't like a lot of the same things and rarely saw eye to eye. One of the many things that they disagreed on or had different takes of it was the government. The Federalists wanted a strong government and would do all that they can to have one. The Republicans, on the other hand, did not want a strong government because they feared that if they had a strong government, they would endanger people's liberties. This is according to the text page 292. Another thing that they disagreed on was the French government or the French in general. The Federalists did not like the French very much but the Republicans did. The Republicans liked the French…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    dbq essay

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Age of Democracy and the Age of Absolutism were two different periods of time. The age of Enlightenment had new ideas spreading throughout the world about government and human rights. The enlightenment was a great period of establishment of democracy .A democracy is when the common people are considered as the primary source of political power. Throughout the enlightenment there were philosophers who believed greatly in a democratic government. Some of the most familiar philosophers were Voltaire, John Locke, and Montesquieu. Each one of these philosophers was humanists and believed in natural rights. The Age of Absolutism was a time of absolute monarchs who had total control of everything. They made laws as they went along and if they didn’t like what the people said the monarchs would throw the people into jail and or put them to death. The Age of democracy is a response or answer to the Age of Absolutism by the new ideas that spread throughout the world. Although democracy and absolutism had advantages and disadvantages, democracy was a more effective type of government for it limited royal power and protected the rights of the people socially, politically, and economically. Throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, tension arose between the two different types of governments, the democracy and absolute monarchs.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The followers of Jefferson and Madison called their party the Republicans or the Democratic- Republicans. The Republicans wanted to limit government. They feared a strong central government would endanger people's liberties. the Federalist and Republicans had sharply opposing views on the role ordinary people should play in government.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays