January 31, 2013
Assignment 1
Criminal Laws In Alabama, Burglary is when a person knowingly enters or remains unlawfully in a building with intent to commit a crime therein. Burglary in the third degree is a Class C felony, which carries a minimum of 1 year and 1 day but not more than 10 years in prison, and fines that cannot exceed more than $15,000 or any amount exceeding double the pecuniary gain to the defendant or loss to the victim caused by the commission of the offense. In the Mobile, Alabama Code of Ordinances, the crime of Burglary is not listed as a particular ordinance but as a violation of a state law and is punishable by the state criminal code Section 13A-7-7. Most crimes listed in the Mobile Code of Ordinances are more based on violations of locally approved ordinances. Most of them deal with the preservation of city properties and public domains rather than actual criminal laws. Mobile City Code Ordinance about the horse drawn carriages is a unique one to me. It states that all animal-drawn carriages should meet a certain design standard given listed in the codes and can only be used by passengers for hire. There are also route limitations given to exactly where the carriages can be used and must be approved by the city traffic engineering director before being used. I do not think this law should abolished. There are still actual carriage companies located in Mobile and operating right down the street from my house.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Different for indigenous people, given no acknowledge of land ownership and traditional rights and customs as well as traditional rules…
- 1138 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
After a series of threatening phone calls to the victim, Mr. Helman sent a birthday card laced with ricin to his ex-girlfriend’s boyfriend. He admitted to his attempt to one of his co-workers and they informed the police. His trial is November 17, 2014.…
- 141 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In Law 21 it says, “if a man has broken through the wall to rob a house, they shall put him to death and pierce him, or hang him in the hole in the wall that he has made.” (Doc D) Who wants a dead guy hanging in their wall!? Also, this is unfair because isn’t there such a thing as second chances? Should someone really be killed because he was so poor he had to resort to robbery? Second, in Law 23 it states: If the robber isn’t caught, the mayor and the city shall pay for him to replace his things. (Doc D) Why should the mayor and the city pay for him to get his things back? He can save up to buy his own things - the mayor shouldn’t have…
- 645 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
1. What kind of strike does the law not allow to form the basis of self-defense claims?…
- 430 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In law 21 it claims, “If a man has broken through the wall [to rob] a house, they shall put him to death and pierce him, or hang him in the hole in the wall which he has made.” In particular, law 23 declares “If the robber is not caught, the man who has been robbed shall formally declare whatever he has lost before a god, and the city and the mayor in whose territory or district the robbery has been committed shall replace for his whatever he has lost.” It is true that the property law was unjust but it is also just in lots of ways. As a result, law 21 is fair because if a man tries to rob someone’s house, he should get a punishment like killing him, piercing him, or hanging him on the wall that he made to get into the house. Law 23 is fair because the man lost lots of items that he may have needed and he should get them back by someone, so he is getting them back by the city or the mayor. Therefore, laws 53 and 54 are fair because if a man floods his neighbors field then the man should help restore all the crops that he cause to be lost in the…
- 827 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
8. In a shootout with the armed guard during this a bank teller and police officer is shot.…
- 931 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
• Under Section 2397 of the state penal code, does a burglary occur when an individual enters a neighbor’s garage by breaking a window, takes three cases of beer, and the garage is a separate building located about 6 feet from the dwelling?…
- 594 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the greatest right’s we have in America is the right to be innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. It is ultimately the job of the prosecutor to prove to the people, the jury and to the court that the accused is in fact guilty of a crime. The accused either has his own or appointed attorney to present his various defenses to argue why he acted the way he did during the crime. According to Criminal Law Today, “A defense consists of evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorneys to show why that person should not be held liable for a criminal charge” (Schmalleger 2010, pg. 114). This paper will discuss various forms of criminal defenses and how they are used in court.…
- 881 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The case of Miller v. Alabama (2012) is the result of Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals case No. 10-9646, which involves a 14-year-old named Evan Miller who was convicted of aggravated murder, and sentenced by the Alabama state court to a mandatory term of life in prison without parole. Miller and a friend assaulted Miller 's neighbor, and set fire to his home after spending the evening drinking alcohol and using drugs. As a result of his actions, the neighbor died. Miller was originally charged as an adult; however, his case was removed to adult court, and he was charged with murder and arson. During the trial, the jury found Miller guilty of the crime, and he was sentenced to a punishment of life without parole as statutorily mandated (Supreme Court of the United States, 2011).…
- 1806 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The specific aims and purposes of criminal law is to punish criminals, and prevent people from becoming future criminals by using deterrence. “Having a criminal justice system that imposes liability and punishment for violations deter.” (Paul H. Robinson, John M. Darley, Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation, Oxford Journal of Legal studies, volume 24, No. 2 (2004), pp. 173-205). Criminal law intimidates citizens because most people won’t want to be arrested or have a write up on their personal record. Criminal law controls behaviour but only outlines what a good citizen should be doing, by creating laws. “More precisely, the term refers to substantive criminal law - a body of law that prohibits certain kinds of conduct and imposes sanctions for unlawful behaviour.” (The Canadian Encyclopedia, Criminal Law, http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/articles/criminal-law, para. 1.) Having laws and not enforcing them is pointless, so by creating a law you need to enforce it strictly so people stop committing the offence. Like in Alberta and other parts of Canada the Distracted Driving law was in full effect and anyone caught texting and driving or anything along those lines was given a major demerit dock, and a hefty ticket you need to pay. By doing this it enforces the law and creates that thought in the back of the citizens head that says “should I do that? What will happen if I text and drive and get caught?”. However, most criminals don’t have that subconscious thought and don’t care if they get caught breaking the law, that’s why so many criminals are re-offenders. Laws are either…
- 1636 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Answer all questions in detail (At least 15 lines AND no more than 50 lines for each answer – including sub sections). Provide your justification based on earlier cases or other supporting material. Structure and presentation of your answers will affect the points. (Cite your references in the body of the answers if needed)…
- 1767 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Freeman, C.G. (2013). Supreme court cases of interest. Criminal Justice, 28(1), 46-49. Retrieved August 10, 2014 from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1353616933?accountid=458…
- 815 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Schmalleger, F. (2010). Criminal law today: An introduction with capstone cases (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.…
- 1304 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Many people of history lived in limited geographocal colonies that were independent, close-knit entities called:…
- 1410 Words
- 7 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The sentencing judge found that it was established beyond reasonable doubt that the respondent, after finding out that Flick was pregnant, that the course of terminating the offspring by any means in his power, either consensual or otherwise was going to be taken and was part of his thought process during the course of Flicks pregnancy up to the events on the 20th of August 2002. Mens Rea in this case concerning a guilty mind in regards to King has been proven by the actions that led to the assault. It has been stated before the court that King sought an abortion upon the beginning of the pregnancy, determining his disagreement towards the life of the child, and his outlook towards the future of the pregnancy, also being emphasised during his conversations involving Jessica Williams and Brianne McCarthy offering them a payment of $500.00 if they would ‘bash’ Flick as long as it resulted in the death of the baby. His honour concluded that this course of actions was evident in his previous actions, therefore proving a guilty mind.…
- 1650 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays