Running head: Contrast and Comparison of Single-sex School and Co-ed School
Contrast and Comparison of Single-sex School and Co-ed school
The education systems nowadays are made up of organizations ranging from kindergartens, general education schools, single-sex schools and co-ed schools to universities. This structure is designed to formulate people’s knowledge one step at a time according to their levels. School is one of the most important stages of educational system in our lives where we are trained to absorb basic knowledge and prepare for our future. Often times, schools are divided into single-sex schools, where only boys or girls study, and co-ed schools, where boys and girls study together. This choice demands that parents choose between co-ed school and single-sex school and decide what would be better for their children. This essay will compare and contrast these two forms of educational approaches to determine that co-educational school is better than single-sex school and is the most practical form of schooling. Co-education schools have a diversity of students from different economic and gender backgrounds. It is an efficient way of schooling for poorer countries that do not have the capital to build single-sex schools. Therefore, the biggest advantage of co-ed school is that there will be no need to open separate schools exclusively for boys or girls, because both boys and girls can study in same schools and they can be taught by the same staff. From childhood we know that kids like to play with each other and it is not depend on gender that is why friendships develop in natural way. From sociological point of view same thing happens in co-ed school. Pupils meet each other and have to be together in the society and if they will be studying together from the very beginning, they can understand well each other. As girls and boys become teenagers they participate in many activities, develop new societies and clubs in school where they are taking part in pleasant and friendly environment. This friendly atmosphere continues in the classroom, which allows them to share and express their point of view easily. In co-ed school boys and girls will be trained to take place in the community and how to behave with not just people of the same gender by also the other gender. For instance, if they will start working for international company where both genders are working together it would be easier for them to communicate with others, because they will know how to behave themselves. This experience will break their insufficient perceptions of each gender and will provide great social and personal development of relationships in later life. Another important point of co-education is that this type of school is very successful in challenging of sexist attitudes. In order to prove this we should answer on question “what do we know about sexism and how the single-sex or co-educational gender grouping of schools affects the occurrence, form, and severity of sexism in the classroom?” Sexism is an analogue to racism means a fundamental and pervasive institutionalized bias on the basis of sex, with discrimination usually directed against women. The rationale for sexism is the biological difference between males and females that dictates differential social roles, status, and norms (Lee, Marks, Byrd, 1994, pp. 92). In the past it meant that female had weak role in the society and males were powerful gender, which is always on the top. And this was the main purpose of development of single-sex schools. But nowadays women achieved equality in the society. As men they can work, build, manage, lead, guide or in other words do all things that men can do in the society. Sexism almost eradicated from our society and it is important point, and that is why co-ed school is very successful in challenging of sexist attitudes. For instance, there are many subjects that provide many discussions and debates...
References: Arms E., Herr K., (2004) Accountability and Single-Sex Schooling: A Collision of Reform Agendas. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 41, No. 3, Accountability and Equity, рp. 527-555
Castell et al. Object Lesson: Critical Visions of Educational Technology. Retrieved from (April 20, 2007) http: www.shecan.com
Nolan, H., Co-ed schools offer advantages (2004). Retrieved from (April 21, 2007) http://media.www.lsureveille.com/media/storage/paper868/news/2004/09/02/News/CoEd-Schools.Offer.Advantages-2050220.shtml
Purcell, S., Mixed advantages (1999). Retrieved from (April 20, 2007) http://www.sparkisland.com/public/articles/coed_singlesex_parents/parent.html
Smith, I., Gender differentiation: Gender differences in academic achievement and self-concept in coeducational and single-sex schools (2002). Retrieved from (April 20, 2007) http://alex.edfac.usyd.edu.au/LocalResource/study1/coed.html
Sultangalieva, A., (1998). Availability, quality and needed education in Kazakhstan. Human Development Report Kazakhstan, 43-47.
Zanders, A. (1993) A presentation of the arguments for and against single-gender schooling, in: D.
Hollinger (Ed.) Single-gender schooling: perspectives from practice and research (vol. 1) (Washing- ton, DC, Office of Educational Research).
Please join StudyMode to read the full document