Preview

Constitutional Rights

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1438 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constitutional Rights
Constitutional Rights

Constitutional Rights are afforded to every American Citizen by the first ten amendments to the Constitution or more commonly known as The Bill of Rights. The fourth amendment of The Bill of Rights applies to all and states, "the right of the people to be secure in their persons" (para.4). When a person accepts a position anywhere, whether at a small family owned grocery store or a major corporation, one does so with the understanding that some inalienable rights will be given up. This paper examines if an employer can crush those rights by using lie detector tests, monitor employee phone calls and emails; use surveillance cameras, and issue random drug-testing.

Drug-Testing

The American Civil Liberties Union states, "drug testing of individuals without cause is ineffective, expensive and, often times, illegal" (para. 1) as well as, "drug testing of individuals without cause is an affront to the Fourth Amendment" (para. 2). While the fourth amendment does state, "the right of the people to be secure in their persons," it does not imply that only the employee is to be secure in his person (para.4). At Kelsey High School, the administration has come to the conclusion that drug-testing while expensive and legal is in fact, effective. The children 's safety while in the care of the school is the number one priority. Personal privacy is not being violated when a teacher is asked to take a drug test that will only ensure our youth is in safe hands.

Lie detector tests

The Employee Polygraph Protection Act of 1988 prohibits private employers to request an employee to submit to a lie detector test whether that test is, for pre-employment or during an employee 's term of employment, (Barnes, Dworkin, & Richards, 1980) Kelsey High school realizes that an employee may file suit against the school if he believes that they are wrongly accused. Furthermore, unless the employee is under investigation for embezzlement or any



References: ACLU: American Civil Liberties Union. (2007). Teachers Join Us: Protect Your Privacy. Retrieved October 26, 2007, from http://www.aclu.org/drugpolicy/testing/31358res20070917.html Apollo Group (2006) Virtual Organizations Cornell University Law School. (2007). United States Consitution. Retrieved October 26, 2007, from http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution. unknown. (April 2004) www.privcom.gc.ca Privacy Rights Clearinghouse

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    legal memo citations

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Emily Gold Waldman, Students Fourth Amendment Rights in Schools: Strip Searches, Drug Tests, and more, 26 Touro L. Rev. 1131 (2011)…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authors also state that suspicionless searches teach students that rights do not matter. I disagree with the author's point of view on overstating the dangers of drugs in schools. I believe it is a growing concern in our public school system. How do we expect a student to concentrate in class if he is stoned all the time? I think instituting random school searches should be on a case by case basis by school district. Blankenau and Leeper's article do not raise any issues of escalating school violence. Are weapons growing concerns like drugs are? The authors surveyed responses of Nebraska High School Principles to obtain data on how effective their drug polices have been. The article in this book does not allow me to make any comments on the strengths and weaknesses of their field study because they did not go in depth of what the study…

    • 4872 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. When should a school employee have the right to search you or your belongings?…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drug Testing Case Summary

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another case that addresses drug testing is Aubrey v. School Board of Lafayette Parish (1998). In this case we are looking at the Fourth Amendment rights of employees. Aubrey was a custodian at an elementary school. In December 1992 the board adopted an Employee Drug Testing Policy stating all "safety sensitive" employees are subject to random selection and drug testing each year. In August of 1993, Aubrey attended and in-service where the y policy was dispersed and reviewed. On September 28, 1994, Aubrey and fourteen other employees undergo drug testing through urinalysis screening. Aubrey tested positive for a chemical that is known to be found in marijuana. In lieu of termination, the Board recommended that Aubrey attend a substance abuse program.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All though the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. consitition " the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures (Ehlenberger 1)". School officials do not need probable cause or a warrant to search students, a public school is a place that should foster an environment that is safe and free from criminal activity. Drug dogs search ensures a protected student body and are only minimally invasive. Resource officers, teachers, and administartion with experience in this practice of drug searches often discover many complications with condoning the searches. First, officers need to have a reason to search for drugs.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this paper is assess the limits search and seizure in public schools, apply specific ruling, analyze the New Jersey v. T.L.O. case and explain, recommend changes to existing (specific) laws to create a fairer educational setting in terms of search and seizure and peer review. School officials are responsible for providing a safe and orderly school environment. The officials are required to address disrupting or unsafe behavior that violate school policy and rules. It may require searching of students and their belongings. Dealing with disrupted behavior is a difficult situation that requires decision-making on when, where and how to conduct a search and seizure. My assess limit search and seizure is on hunch or just general search. School officials must have reasonable or proper cause to search.…

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S Constitutional amendments place limits on what law enforcement and how a trial should be governed. These strict rights are to be followed because if an officer fails to abide by the proper procedure, the trial court may forcibly put an end to evidence obtained in violation of proper procedure or even release the arrested suspect. This is an amendment that deals with each of the following: criminal due process, arrest, interrogation, search and seizure, Miranda, punishment, the right to jury trials, and the right to counsel.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A legal challenge to the policy arose when a student and his parents refused to consent to drug testing and he was denied the chance to play football. Their lawsuit charged that the district violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures as well as his privacy rights under the Oregon state constitution. The District Court rejected their claims, but they won on appeal. The school district then appealed to the U.S. Supreme…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people today are arguing whether this move towards making drug testing a requirement to receive welfare benefits is unjust or not. This argument is based on the fourth amendment…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Defending your constitutional rights, is what this country is about. Deeming an item of the United States Constitution unconstitutional may seem to many as an impossible task, however in this land of the free and home of the brave, we aim to make sure that whatever Constitutional stone the framers left unturned has been or will be adhered to and interpreted accordingly. Although a law may read the same on paper, the interpretation of that law may have different meanings (broad or narrow) depending on the particulars of the situation. Despite the misconceptions people may feel are incorporated into the U.S. Constitution or the framers’ intent, judicially the Supreme Court will always be the deciding entity; which is the dilemma in the case…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Schulman, M (1996). Little Brother is Watching: Employer Monitoring. Retrieved on June 21, 2013 from www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/iie/v9n2/brother.html…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rights And Amendments

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When dealing with rights, laws, and amendments there will always be particular uncertainties, especially if they are in the best interest of the people. Amendments are meant to correct, provide change and make improvements for past amendments, making new ones more specific to each citizen that is involved. Amendments for the constitution involve making sure that rules and laws are put forth correctly and properly obeyed. Many amendments were made under the circumstances of the time period in which they were created. For example, the twelfth amendment which establishes Electoral College, this was developed because many only wanted educated people to vote. Many people used the twelfth amendment to control the voting system. However, in…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people believe that the right of privacy should be extended to the workplace. Others feel that, on the contrary, that such an extension would constitute an unwarranted incursion into the management's right to manage.…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question has come up many times regarding drug testing in the work force. Should it be done, would it violate a person's rights? You could see it ways, yes and no. I have been drug tested many times for working at loyal care, which is a place that works with the elderly, helping with everyday living, so that they can remain in their homes and not have to go into an assisted living facility. I never had any feelings of having my rights violated, but my feelings are not shared by many people. The feelings of violation might be one of crossing the line in their private life. I agree, but the world we live in is changing and more and more people have problems with drug abuse. If you are interested in doing a job, that requires a drug screen, you must come to realize that it is not a violation of your rights, but could be a violation of someone else's rights. It is a protection for the employer and the people that you will be working with, or working for. It is a protection of for other people. If an employer was to hire someone and that person was on drugs, they could be harming other people. Certain drugs are highly dangerous, not only to the person that takes them, but the person who is around them. Some people addicted to drugs commit horrible crimes to feed their addiction. This would be a violation of the employer, if they did not…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One side of the argument is clearly said: Drug testing infringes and violates the rights of students. “The first large-scale national study on student drug testing found no difference in rates of drug use between schools that have drug testing programs and those that do not.” (Students’ Rights, 2005). Another side to the argument says that drug…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays