The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0048-3486.htm
Consequences of the performance
Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Commerce, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, and
Received 7 August 2008
Revised September 2008
Accepted 4 July 2009
School of Management, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of low quality performance appraisals (PA) on three human resource management outcomes ( job satisfaction, organisational commitment and intention to quit).
Design/methodology/approach – Using data from 2,336 public sector employees clusters of PA experiences (low, mixed and high) were identiﬁed. Regression analysis was then employed to examine the relationship between low quality PA experiences and job satisfaction, organisational commitment and intention to quit.
Findings – Employees with low quality PA experiences (relative to those with mixed and high quality PA experiences) were more likely to be dissatisﬁed with their job, be less committed to the organisation and more likely to be contemplating leaving the organisation. Research limitations/implications – The data were collected in a large public sector research organisation where the results of the appraisal were linked to pay increments. Further research is needed to determine the applicability of the results to private sector employees. Practical implications – The quality of the PA experience varies and a low quality experience results in lower job satisfaction and organisational commitment and higher quit intentions. The challenge for human resource (HR) practitioners is to decide whether the allocation of additional resources to ensure that all employees have a uniformly high quality PA experience is a worthwhile investment.
Originality/value – Research has tended to focus on the relationship between a single feature of a PA process and HR outcomes. Organisations need to acknowledge the importance of the overall PA experience when evaluating its consequences for HRM outcomes. Keywords Performance appraisal, Performance management, Job satisfaction, Pay, Organizational behaviour, Employee turnover
Paper type Research paper
There is an increasing use being made of the performance appraisal process (Millward et al., 2000; Nankervis and Compton, 2006; Wiese and Buckley, 1998) generally This research was funded by grants received from the Faculty of Economics and Commerce, University of Melbourne. The authors would like to thank management and staff of public sector research (PSR) and the ofﬁcials of the Community and Public Sector Union for their support for the project.
Vol. 39 No. 3, 2010
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
motivated by an organisational desire to affect employee behaviours and attitudes and, ultimately, organisational performance (Aguinis, 2009; Gardner, 2008; Murphy and Cleveland, 1991; Shields, 2007). This occurs as a consequence of the establishment of goals at the beginning of the evaluation cycle which provide employees with clear performance targets, the monitoring of performance during the evaluation cycle (which can be used to assist poor performers) and the reinforcement provided for good performance through the provision of rewards, usually in the form of higher pay (Milkovich and Wigdor, 1991). This process is seen to encourage employee performance in subsequent performance cycles (Heneman and Werner, 2005; Mani, 2002).
The capacity to achieve these positive outcomes will be a function of the quality of the performance appraisal (PA) experience. Taking a lead from the operations...
References: Adams, J.S. (1965), “Inequity in social exchange”, in Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in
Experimental Social Psychology, Vol
Aguinis, H. (2009), Performance Management, 2nd ed., Pearson Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle
Behrman, D.N., Bigoness, W.J. and Perreault, W.D. (1982), “Sources of job-related ambiguity and
their consequences upon salespersons’ job satisfaction and performance”, Management
Science, Vol. 27, pp. 1246-60.
Blau, G. (1999), “Testing the longitudinal impact of work variables and performance appraisal
satisfaction on subsequent overall job satisfaction”, Human Relations, Vol
Bratton, J. and Gold, J. (1999), Human Resource Management, 2nd ed., Macmillan Business,
Campbell, D.J. and Campbell, K.M. (2000), “Why individuals voluntarily leave: perceptions of
human resource managers versus employees”, Asia Paciﬁc Journal of Human Resources,
Campbell, D.J., Campbell, K.M. and Chia, H.B. (1998), “Merit pay, performance appraisal, and
individual motivation – an analysis and alternative”, Human Resource Management,
Chen, A., Lam, W. and Zhong, J.A. (2007), “Leader-member exchange and member performance: a
new look at individual-level negative feedback-seeking behavior and team-level
Curtis, A.B., Harvey, R.D. and Ravden, D. (2005), “Sources of political distortions in performance
appraisal”, Group and Organization Management, Vol
Dyer, L., Schwab, D.P. and Theriault, R.D. (1976), “Managerial perceptions regarding salary
increase data”, Personnel Psychology, Vol
Feldman, D.C. (2000), “The Dilbert Syndrome: how employee cynicism about ineffective
management is changing the nature of careers in organisations”, The American Behavioral
Scientist, Vol. 43 No. 8, pp. 1286-300.
Fletcher, C. and Williams, R. (1996), “Performance management, job satisfaction and
organisational commitment”, British Journal of Management, Vol
Fortin, M. (2008), “Perspectives on organizational justice: concept clariﬁcation, social context
integration, time and links with morality”, International Journal of Management Reviews,
Fried, Y. and Ferris, G.R. (1987), “The validity of the job characteristics model: a review and a
meta analysis”, Personnel Psychology, Vol
Fugate, M., Kinicki, A.J. and Prussia, G.E. (2008), “Employee coping with organisational change:
an examination of alternative theoretical perspectives and models”, Personnel Psychology,
Gardner, C.E. (2008), “Employee evaluation: is it worth the effort?”, DVM Magazine, January 1,
Ghorpade, J. and Chen, M.M. (1995), “Creating quality-driven performance appraisal systems”,
Academy of Management Executive, Vol
Green, F. (2004), “Work intensiﬁcation, discretion and the decline in wellbeing at work”, Eastern
Economic Journal, Vol
Greenberg, J. (1986), “Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations”, Journal of
Applied Psychology, Vol
Griffeth, R.W., Hom, P.W. and Gaertner, S. (2000), “A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates
of employee turnover: update, moderator tests and research implications for the next
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. and Black, W. (1999), Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed.,
Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L. and Hayes, T.L. (2002), “Business-unit-level relationship between
employee satisfaction, employee engagement and business outcomes: a meta analysis”,
Heathﬁeld, S. (2007), “Performance appraisals don’t work – what does?”, The Journal for Quality
and Participation, Spring, pp
Hendrix, W.H., Robbins, Y., Miller, J. and Summers, T.P. (1998), “Effects of procedural and
distributive justice on the factors predictive of turnover”, Journal of Social Behaviour and
Heneman, R.L. and Werner, J.M. (2005), Merit Pay: Linking Pay to Performance in a Changing
World, 2nd ed., Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT.
Hom, P. and Griffeth, R. (1995), Employee Turnover, South-Western College, Cincinnati, OH.
Iverson, R.D. (1992), Employee Intent to Stay: An Empirical Test of a Revision of the Price Mueller
Model, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Jawahar, I.M. (2006), “An investigation of potential consequences of satisfaction with appraisal
feedback”, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, Vol
Kahn, R.L., Wolfe, D.M., Quinn, R.P. and Rosenthal, R.A. (1964), Organisational Stress: Studies in
Role Conﬂict and Ambiguity, Wiley, New York, NY.
Keeping, L.M. and Levy, P.E. (2000), “Performance appraisal reactions: measurement, modelling
and method bias”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol
Kessler, I. and Purcell, J. (1992), “Performance-related pay: objectives and application”, Human
Resource Management Journal, Vol
Kiggundu, M.N. (1983), “Task interdependence and job design: test of a theory”, Organizational
Behavior and Human Performance, Vol
Kuvaas, B. (2007), “Different relationships between perceptions of developmental performance
appraisal and work performance”, Personnel Review, Vol
Latham, G.P., Skarlicki, D., Irvine, D. and Siegel, J.P. (1993), “The increasing importance of
performance appraisals to employee effectiveness in organizational settings in North
Lind, E.A. and Tyler, Y. (1988), The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, Plenum, New York,
Please join StudyMode to read the full document