Comparison Of Classical Crime Theorists

Pages: 2 (349 words) / Published: Sep 21st, 2017
The classical crime theorists believes in first preventing crimes over punishment, and when laws are broken then the penalties must be legislated given the circumstances proportionate to the crime committed (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). Furthermore, classical theorist supports the utility of law, which is classified as the great happiness shared by the greatest number (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). According to Beccaria, laws are implemented conditions that unite men to form a society (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). Beccaria believes the basis of criminal law should be comprised of positive sanctions, which facilitates justice and man’s only worry should be from the natural consequences of their actions (Bohm & Vogel, 2011). Consequently, the source of law should

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Classical Management Theorists
  • Classical Sociological Theorists
  • Comparison of Theorists
  • A Comparison of Theorists
  • Classical Approach to Crime
  • Classical Comparison Essay
  • theories on crime comparison
  • Theorists
  • The Classical Approach to Crime Control
  • theorist