Preview

Compare&Contrast the Contributions of Henri Fayol & Frederick Taylor in Management Thoughts.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
588 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare&Contrast the Contributions of Henri Fayol & Frederick Taylor in Management Thoughts.
Compare&contrast the contributions of Henri Fayol & Frederick Taylor in Management Thoughts. Revolution of the 19th Century has paved the way to the development of an organized systematic approach to management. In the classical approach, there are two main subgroups: Scientific management of Frederick Taylor and general administrative theory of Henri Fayol. Here to discuss the differences and similarities between them.

Difference between them can be found in these areas:
Focus:
Frederick Taylor’s theory focuses on individual worker-machine relationships in manufacturing plants, while Henri Fayol focuses on the top managers and their actions. This is the basic difference that Taylor reviewed the organization from the bottom and Fayol view it from the top (George, 1968).

Key concepts:
Frederick Taylor’s scientific management theory analyzed work using scientific methods to determine the one best way to complete production tasks & emphasized study of tasks, selection and training of workers, and cooperation between workers and management. However, Henri Fayol came up with the famous 5 functions and 14 principles of management.

Contributions:
Frederick Taylor’s theory improved factory productivity and efficiency significantly and was the first one to introduced scientific analysis to the workplace. Besides, its piece-rate system which equated worker rewards and performance improve workers’ performance and it instilled cooperation between management and workers.In contrast to Henri Fayol’s theory, It viewed management as a profession that can be trained and developed and emphasized the broad policy aspects of top-level managers. In addition, it underlined all elements necessary to organize and manage corporation as a whole, so it is more systematic.

Rights of workers:
Scientific management misread the human side of work. Frederick Taylor failed to recognize that workers also have social needs, participation in decision making and that



References: * Thomas S.Bateman& Carl P.Zeithaml (1993), Management Function &Strategy, Richard D.IRWIN INC.Press. * Don Helllriegel, John W.Slocum,Jr(June,1993) ,Management by Addison-Wesley Publishing Compay. * Donald C. Mosley, Paul H.Pieri, Leon C. Megginson(1996) Management by Harpercollins College .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Scientific Management

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Taylor developed this theory as he worked his way up from a labourer to a manager in a US steelworks company. He realised the worker in his company were not efficient, hence he wanted to improve the workers’ productivity.…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Changes were brought through the ideas of men like Frederick Taylor and also through the development in production from the assembly line. Frederick Winslow Taylor embraced the new principals of “scientific management,” which is also known as “Taylorism”. Taylorism is a theory of management that analyzes and combine workflows. Its main objective is improving economic efficiency, especially labor productivity. “Taylor urged employers to reorganize the production process by subdividing tasks.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In 'The Ideas of Frederick.W.Taylor: An evaluation ', there are various key themes and principles evident which have provided the foundations for some contemporary styles of management. The author suggests that Taylor 's concept of scientific management can be likened to the works of Thomas Edison. Scientific Management is Taylor 's most widely recognized principle. Taylor believed in a 'scientific approach toward managerial decisions making '. That managerial decisions should be based upon 'proven fact rather than on tradition... ' This principle proved to be most effective when selecting workmen and the time taken to complete a task, through scientific selection and time and motion studies, the man most suited to a particular type of work will be chosen, who is able to complete the work within a specific time frame through the 'one best way '. Taylor believed in the standardization of tools and procedures becoming cohesive, allowing for effective and efficient work time, with adequate rest and pause breaks and shorter working hours. To motivate the worker…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Taylorism

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Frederick Winslow Taylor published a book in 1911 recommending his theory of scientific management which altered the management model later. There are many management theories willing to improve workers’ efficiency but not influential while Taylor used scientific methods to sum up standardized rules and the theory was spread till today and still available. In the following text, three key elements of the Taylorism and their applicability in contemporary organizations will be presented and analysed.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taylor (1911) in his scientific management theory explains his 4 basic principles, on how to manage. Firstly the manager needs to know what to do and how to do it in order to achieve maximum efficiency. The manager then needs to recruit his employees and train them so as to achieve greater results in the quickest time. He also explains on how the manager will need to keep his employees in check, and reward them with benefits for good performance. Also the manager needs to divide the work responsibility amongst the workforce and take some responsibility himself.…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Scientific management was developed by Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856 – 1915) at the end of the nineteenth century to improve labor productivity by scientifically analyzing and establishing optimal workflow processes. Taylor believed that in the same way that there is a best machine for each job, so there is a best working method by which people should undertake their jobs. He considered that all work processes could be analyzed into discrete tasks and that by scientific method it was possible to find the “One Best Way” to perform each task. Each job was broken down into component parts, each part timed and the parts rearranged into the most efficient method of working.…

    • 2905 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Taylorism, additionally known as Scientific Management, is a theory of management methodology that emphasizes on maximising work efficiency. Developed and named after an American industrial engineer, Frederick Winslow Taylor. Through thorough use of a stopwatch and a clipboard, Taylor put all his research and outcomes into a book called the Principles of Scientific Management, which was later published in 1911. In the monograph Taylor’s notion was to mend the economical proficiency, principally in the labouring output. He believed that there were great losses, when “the whole country is suffering through inefficiency in almost of all of our daily acts” (Taylor 1911) and that “remedies in inefficiency lies in systematic managements” (Taylor 1911). Only by succeeding in “clearly defined laws, rules, and principles, as a foundation” (Taylor 1911), results that follow will be truly astounding. While his theories have survived the system for the last ten decades through much criticism, can it still benefit the practices in the 21st century? Moreover will it be abolished by newer theories because of its weaknesses? This literature review will be an attempt to discuss the principles of Scientific Management, how it advances and limits its application in present-day organisations.…

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Scientific management began in the1880s ~ 1910s. While an American engineer, Frederick Taylor (1856 ~ 1947) was working in manufacturing industry, he observed that there was a natural difference in productivity and output between workers. Although some workers were smarter and more talented than the others, they were often unmotivated and chosen to work at the slowest pace. Taylor believed that there was a best way to do a task which could be achieved by carefully studying an individual’s work (the time and motion studies). By the method of process standardization, the best practice of performing a task can then be applied to other workers. Taylor’s objective was improving efficiency, increasing productivity and output and lowering cost1, 2. His idea and theory were published in “Shop Management” (1903) and “The principle of Scientific Management” (1911). His theory was called Taylorism and he was considered to be the father of scientific management3. At the similar period, another American, Henry Ford (1863 ~ 1947) and his team applied the principles of scientific management at his…

    • 3192 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argument Against Taylorism

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Frederick Winslow Taylor is the person who discovered scientific management, also known as ‘Taylorism’. It is a theory about management that analyses and synthesize the workflow of a work place but the main objective is to improve the efficiency of the economy, especially in labour productivity based on five principles as described by Buchanan(2010, pg 423).The first principle of Taylorism is to have ‘A clear division…

    • 1970 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Management has been discovered since 3000 BC in city of Ur (Iraq) where written records as a means of recording business transactions was found (Wolfgang, et al. 1995). Management was essential for every company to run their business efficiently. Without a management, businesses can’t control their workers effectively, there will be a lot of wasted motion and the outcome of the products is not very satisfying. The beginning of the twentieth century businesses were expanding and capital was available. However, labour was in short supply (Ryan, 2008). Management began looking at methods to improve efficiency. Frederick W. Taylor of the Midvale Steel Company recognized the need for scientific methods to management in order to increase productivity. He concerned to find a perfect management that can produce more products in less time and effort, and then he came up with an idea that called scientific management or often called Taylorism.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Personal Ethics

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Frederick Taylor (1856-1915) was the founder of the scientific management theory during the time of the Industrial Revolution. The management theory developed to organize and teach work process in a scientific manner increased productivity and profit. Taylor believed that using a scientific method for each element or task of an individual’s work would increase productivity. A worker’s job could be measured with scientific accuracy by using time and motion studies and the expertise of experienced workers (managers). A scientific system was established to hire, train, and promote workers based on their competence and abilities and match them to the most appropriate job. Productivity would be improved through scientific selection and progressive development of the worker. The relationship between the managers and workers needed to be cooperative and interdependent. The manager was to plan, prepare and supervise. The workers were to do the work. Financial incentives were used as a reward and workers were reimbursed according to their level of production (Marquis & Huston, 2009).…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The scientific management theory is sometimes referred to as Taylorism. Frederick Taylor theorized that workers need massive amounts of supervision and management, along with adequate payment and time off, to be successful in the workplace (Hindle, 2009). The idea this theory proposes is that workers will be more productive in less time with closer supervision. It basically states that workers are lazy and without stricter guidelines and monitoring would take advantage of hourly pay by doing as little work as possible in the most…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Management is said to have no fixed definition, but different authorities on management have different views on it. The foundations of organizational behavior are based on the theories of two classical management entrepreneurs, F W Taylor and Henri Fayol[->0], these management theorists, although focusing on different aspects of Classical Management and organization have been fused as central and essential theories in Organizational behavior. The Scientific management which bases on the Classical Taylorism theory produced by Fedrick Taylor in 1880’s and 1890’s is distinctive from what Fayol contributed towards Behaviourist management also known as Administrative management. Both these theories are of great importance and thus, beneficial however with a couple of criticisms attributed to both. Even today a number of significant businesses evolve around these two management theories and thus, its implementation and outcomes are also observed in the modern world today. Although there are many other theories on management that include; Bureaucratic Organization of Weber. The Neo-Classical Theory that includes the Human Relations Movement of Mayo along with others like Roethsilberger and Dickson and the Behavioural Schools of Maslow, McGregor, Herzberg, Argyris, etc. There also exists another theory known as The Modern Management Theory. Taylor mainly concentrated on work organization such as productive efficiency whereas Fayol particularly focused on authority and its implementation/fulfilment. Taylorism is often mentioned with regard to Fordism, as it was closely associated with mass production methods in factories which was observed in Ford productions as well. Whereas Fayolism advocated a consistent set of principles that all organizations would generally apply/require/need to run effectively/properly.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main difference between Taylors and Fayol’s approaches was that Taylor wanted to achieve increased organization efficiency by modifying the way in which workers carry out their tasks and Fayol on the contrary by modifying the way the organization is…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1.Both are Pioneers:Taylor & Fayol are the two Pioneers in the evolution of management thought.2.Both pointed out problems of personnel: Taylor & Fayol both pointed out that the problem of personnel and its management at all levels is the ‘master-key’ to industrial productivity and progress.3.Both implied scientific approach: Both implied scientific approach and scientific method to solve the managerial problems.4. Success depends upon proper utilization of human resources: both had realized that success of a business enterprise depends largely on proper utilization of human resources.5.Stress on the technical and professional aspect: Both stressed on the technical or professional aspect of the management.6.Both are responsible for managerial revolution: Both are responsible for managerial revolution which took place after 1940. 7. Successful managers by profession: Both of them were initially successful managers by profession. They, therefore, approached this new science of management from a practical point of view. 8. Criticism for neglecting human psychology: Both approaches are criticized on the ground of neglecting human psychology. Behavior of the employees under different conditions is not studied in either of these theories. 9. Both wanted to secure maximum: both wanted to secure maximum from available resources.10. Both developed principle of division of work: Both of them developed the principle of division of work. Taylor introduced the principle of unity of command which was later developed by Fayol.11. Both opined that competent mgmt is necessary for success of business: both agreed that neither success nor failure is the result of the workers, contribution, competent mgmt is responsible for the success of the business and the failure of the business is the result of incompetent mgmt.12. Both used…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics