Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Civil War, Edward L. Ayers

Better Essays
1158 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil War, Edward L. Ayers
In this paper, “The American Civil War, Emancipation, and Reconstruction on the World Stage” the author, Edward L. Ayers, is analyzing the events that unfolded and led up to the Civil War so we can clearly see how one thing lead to another. However, at the time they occurred it was not so easy to see. Ayers view on this subject is that this war changed the face of the world. Everything that the war had brought about with the end of slavery being the most prominent also produced other outcomes just as world changing. The use of warfare would be reinvented and the political and economic outcomes all helped set a new world stage.
As children are taught in grade school, the Civil War happened because the North wanted to outlaw slavery, and the South did not. The newly elected Republican Party had thwarted the spread of slavery; however, the South was still very dependent on it due to their labor intensive crops. The United States was not united, but rather a divided country. The 1860 Presidential election, in which Lincoln won, triggered the start of states seceding. By the time Lincoln took office in March of 1861 seven states had seceded from the union (). The eyes of the world were on America as the Civil War was played out; both sides, the North and South, appealed to the world. In the North, Lincoln says that this “embraces more than the date of these United States. It presents to the whole family of man, the question, whether a constitutional republic or democracy . . . can, or cannot maintain its territorial integrity” (Lincoln). The Struggle, was for “a vast future,” (Lincoln) a struggle to give all men “a fair chance in the race of life” (Lincoln).
Abraham Lincoln made the point, to give all men “a fair chance in the race of life” (Lincoln) that the Civil War matters in one way or another to all people and represented the viewpoint of the North. The South expressed their position to have the right to determine their own destiny. America being still a very young nation with a new type of government that governed with laws, verses a monarchy or religion. The eyes of all were upon the conflict. Regardless of who came out the victor, how this new country played out this experiment, would have lasting effects on the entire whole. The Civil War brought more to the table than just deciding slavery, it would show if the experimental government could actually govern and be held together by law (Edward L. Ayers, The American Civil War, Emancipation, and Reconstruction on the world stage).
The North’s diplomacy in the United States was fragile leading up to the Civil War for all sides and parties involved. The Republican Party had come about and had replaced the Whig party. With this the new party the North and South were further split. The South had no Republicans, and the South did not want to stay in the Union if a Northerner became president. With the new Republican Party taking the Government by storm, the ideas of the party were nothing new, therefore further splitting the ties between the North and South. With the Election of 1860 and Abraham Lincoln this was the last straw for the south.
Lincoln seemed to recognize that if the Union had addressed the South as separate nation then the world could have chosen sides. The war would then have been moved from a civil war to a war of a different scale with outside help coming in for the South from the French and British. Even though they weren’t recognized as their own nation, the South sought aid from Britain and France via blackmail on their product of cotton, but were unsuccessful. Instead the European manufactures saw the events unfolding and built up a stockpiles of cotton while other nations became producers themselves (Edward L. Ayers, The American Civil War, Emancipation, and Reconstruction on the world stage). This left the South alone to fight their battle.
As the sides fought their values out on the field many factors went into how they maneuvered, survived and died for their cause. Firstly, they employed industrial age new weapons and tactics on the battlefield. Napoleon’s war in Europe had embraced new tactics and while in the industrial age these new tactics coupled with new weapons made for a very high casualty rate. This led into the second aspect of how they would survive the Civil War. The killing power may have increased dramatically, but the medical aspect of dealing with the wounded was not progressing as fast as the weapons. Casualties and losses for the North and South were over half a million soldiers with most resulting from diseases, due to inadequate treatment and lack of medical tools. Lastly, both sides saw the war coming and each side prepared differently to move their troops. The North built more railroads and telegraph lines (Edward L. Ayers, The American Civil War, Emancipation, and Reconstruction on the world stage), while the south with fewer railroads felt that their waterways would be sufficient to provide transportation and built new ironclad ships. Each had their strengths and weaknesses. The railroads helped the North to mobilize troops quickly up until they reach the end of the line, but then troops had to march to their destination. In the south the waterways were effective at some port cities, but didn’t help much beyond. (Edward L. Ayers, The American Civil War, Emancipation, and Reconstruction on the world stage). The deciding factor seemed to be when the North decided to enlist the help of African Americans. With this nearly 200,000 African Americans coming to the aid of the Union it tipped the war in favor of the North and the war was over. President Lincoln felt the need to write the Emancipation Proclamation, therefore freeing the all slaves. The United States and Haiti are the only two countries in which slavery ended so suddenly.
With the North winning the war, slavery was abolished, and the experimental government had succeeded in keeping the country together. The American Civil War, accomplished great things, shaping not only our Nation but the world. Slavery had ended, warfare had improved due to the industrial age, and political and economic changes occurred worldwide. There was no one who was left unaffected by this war, in the United or in the world. The United States had held together and had preserved the Union, but not without a high cost to be paid. The difficulties that were faced during the war left the nation in need of healing. The next step would be to bring the Union back together, which is the next page in History, the Reconstruction age.

Bibliography
Edward, Ayers. "The American Civil War, Emancipation, and Reconstruction on the World Stage." American Civil War, Emancipation, and Reconstruction on the World Stage. 01 2006: 54. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Civil War Sectionalism

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    America was a divided nation during the Civil War, starting in 1861 and ending in 1865, the battles were fought on Northern and Southern lands. The Union was faced with eleven states in the South for secession, who wanted nothing more than to be disconnected from the United States. This war was fueled by many disputes, sectionalism being the leading cause. Sectionalism within the United States hindered unity within the country due to expansion issues and conflicting views on slavery.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The civil war began with the attack on Fort Sumter and the war was inevitable according to text. "Both parties deprecated war but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came." What the quote says is both sides despised war, but the North would rather fight than let the nation split, and the South would accept war rather than surrender. With the South making the first attack, it makes Lincoln more justified to fight the war. President Lincoln brings positive outcomes of the civil war, unlike the South, they want to keep slavery. Men and women were brutally whipped sometimes murdered and forced to work all day. Women were raped and children were put to work at a young age.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assassination Vacation

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When Lincoln was elected into office the country was divided into the North and South. However, the South became even more alienated when Lincoln was elected President because of his opposition to slavery and his pursuance of its abolishment. As a result of his win, several states succeeded from the Union to join forces and create the Confederacy which then only led the hostility to grow even more. The Confederates took the first shot that really began the Civil War with the attack was at Fort Sumter in April of 1861, which led Lincoln to respond with a call to military action - more Southern states succeeded.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southern Secession

    • 1211 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Presidential election of 1860, Lincoln was elected to help run the country, which led to the secession of the Southern states. According to George Templeton Strong, Lincoln put immediate pressure within his first 10 days in office when the South practically felt forced to commit to treason within a fortnight (two weeks.) The pressure forced upon the Southern states to commit to treason put them under immediate pressure, which was only driving the two regions farther and farther apart and closer to the Southern states seceding. According to the political map of the two regions, Lincoln won none of the Southern states, but he still won the election which made them feel as though they were powerless against the North which made the Southern states uneasy…

    • 1211 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil War Origins and Legacy

    • 2553 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Perhaps the greatest war in American History, the Civil War is unique because of the fact that it was the only war fought on American soil. The American Civil War’s origins were brought forth by complex issues dealing with slavery, expansionism, sectionalism, and political party politics. However the Civil War was mainly devised because of slavery issues and later intensified by tariff issues as well. During this time the United States was forced to confront the issue of whether new areas of settlement were going to be pro-slave states or no slave holding states. After the war slavery was still an ongoing issue in society until it was diminished by Abraham Lincoln. However racial discrimination continued amongst many southerners after blacks were given the right to vote. This summary of the origins and legacy of the Civil War will give more insight of the events that led to the end of slavery and the reconstruction of a new nation.…

    • 2553 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Us History Ia Paper

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Following Abraham Lincoln’s election to the presidency in 1860, Southern states began seceding from the Union. Though personally opposed to slavery and convinced the United States was going to have to be all free or all slave states—"a house divided against itself cannot stand"—he repeatedly said he would not…

    • 2062 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War:The Real ReasonWhat was the Civil War The Civil War began April 12, 1861 with the attacks of Fort Sumter, and did not end until April 9, 1865 with the surrender of General Robert E. Lee of the Confederate Army. Over 620,000 died in the war, along with disease killing twice as many as those lost in battle. 50,000 survivors returned home as amputees. So why was this war fought?A common misconception It is a commonly held view that President Lincoln fought the Civil War to free the slaves. Many believe that this was his goal, that he was the first president to care about the slaves. Based on facts from the video: The Anguish of the Emancipation, I do not agree with this common misconception. The abolishment of slavery was just one of the results after the war. We discuss the common scapegoats, such as slavery, or economics, or tariff policy, or even political power, however these are not the kind of things that a man would sacrifice and die for. The Civil War, I believe was a fight between the North and the South. Each trying to protect their own system and way of life. The Civil War was not fought to free the slaves but to make America into what it would be and what it would mean to be an American.The north vs. the south In the 1800’s America was divided into two parts, North and South. The clash between the two different systems held by each caused there to be tension and eventually caused the inescapable war. The North was an Industrial land. Their factories consisted of paid workers. Slavery was no longer something that the North relied on or believed in. Slavery was now against their way of life and ultimately the North wanted to protect that. The South, however was a much more agricultural land, which produced natural goods. Slaves were the backbone of the South’s economic status. The South still believed in the system of slavery and knew it was a major part of their success. Tension between the North and South aroused because both wanted to…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abraham Lincoln won the election of 1860. As a president of the United States, Lincoln’s goal was to keep the Union together. The problem of slavery and the secession by the South are mainly the two issues that lead to the dissolve of the Union, in which Lincoln put all his efforts to deal with during his presidency. “He believes this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. He does not expect the Union to be dissolved; He does not expect the house to fall; but he does expect it will cease to be divided.” Lincoln claimed that it is either all free or all slaves in the Union, the Union cannot tolerate half free and half slaves. Lincoln viewed slavery as “a moral, social, and political wrong”. He “does not believe it is a constitutional right to hold slaves in a territory of the United States” (Paul Boyer 360). Lincoln’s dream was to free all the slaves, but this dream can only go by gradually, he cannot end slavery immediately because it will further the dissolve of the Union. However, Southerners viewed his victory of being a president of the United States as a victory for abolition. Here the problem raised, southern states decided to begin the process of secession from the Union. Lincoln’s hard time began from now on. How was he going to solve this problem? Lincoln help preserved the Union in three different aspects which are economic, military and political policies. His economic strategy was to use capital, weapon and trade; his military strategy was the war of attrition and the three-part strategy to take over the control of Mississippi River and Richmond; his political strategy was to promise he will not end slavery immediately but gradually and establish the Emancipation of Proclamation to claim that every slaves in South will be free so that they will…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The original seceding states of the Confederacy consisted of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, and Alabama. The people of these states saw themselves extremely different than that of the northern states both politically and culturally, and felt continuous pressure from the population dominating in the northern states to conform to northern ideals. It seemed the only and best option to keep the southern way of life was to become an independent Confederate nation. That idea to become a separate nation was not a sudden idea when Lincoln came into office; it was simply not recognized by previous presidents, which would allow for the issue to hit its climax when he was elected. By the time Lincoln came into office, talks of revolution were already at its tipping point, but as stated by Lincoln, “Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish. And the war came.” Feeling sympathy and the same operation as the seceding states Virginia, North Carolina,…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War lasted four years, from April of 1861 to April of 1865. It physically separated the nation into two, in which the South seceded from the North. The two sides fought for the struggle over slavery - the South was for it, while the North was against it. The South argued that the North was attempting to limit their rights given to them by the Constitution; their rights to exercise those powers were restrained heavily by the politically dominant North. The North at first made a statement stating that the main purpose of the war was to maintain the Union and to keep the South from breaking apart. However, as the war went on, Lincoln found fighting for these terms was impossible; he knew that the slaves had to be freed. This decision to abolish slavery stirred up controversy in the Union, for many white men, while they opposed slavery, did not like the idea that they were fighting for African-Americans. Many riots erupted from many Union states come draft day, clearly showing the unsettlement and dissatisfaction that Americans had with the idea of freeing slaves. The North not only had to deal with the South, but also with themselves.…

    • 546 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immediately after the election and inauguration of Abraham Lincoln, the newly-established Republican Party’s presidential nominee, eleven states of the South seceded from the Union. These events marked the beginning of the Civil War and the war was a result of many political tensions that had emerged between the North and the South in the prior decades, all of which were associated with the institution of slavery installed in the Southern United States. President Lincoln began the Civil War with the South in response to states’ secession from the Union, and therefore, the war was not solely concentrated over the issue of slavery in American society. The North fought to preserve the Union while the Confederacy fought to protect states’ rights. The contributions of African Americans for the Union war effort in the Civil War pushed the federal government, controlled largely by the Republican Party, to fundamentally change the purpose of the war itself, changing the course of the conflict, and therefore, the social and political consequences that followed in the Reconstruction Era.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, immediately after the election and inauguration of Abraham Lincoln, the newly-established Republican Party’s presidential nominee, eleven states of the South seceded from the Union. These events marked the beginning of the Civil War and the war was a result of many political tensions that had emerged between the North and the South in the prior decades, all of which were associated with the institution of slavery installed in the Southern United States. President Lincoln began the Civil War with the South in response to states’ secession from the Union, and therefore, the war was not solely concentrated over the issue of slavery in American society. The North fought to preserve the Union while the Confederacy fought to protect states’ rights. The contributions of African Americans for the Union war effort in the Civil War pushed the federal government. But controlled largely by the Republican Party, to fundamentally change the purpose of the war itself, changing the course of the conflict, and therefore, the social and political consequences that followed in the Reconstruction Era. Slavery was one of the primary disputes between the north and the south before the civil war continued to be a major debate throughout the war and contributed greatly to the North’s victory.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why the South Lost the War

    • 2026 Words
    • 9 Pages

    “A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved—I do not expect the house to fall—but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other.” These words, spoken by Abraham Lincoln during his campaign to be a senator from Illinois, ring eerily true with the truth about the country’s uncertain future. Only three short years after Lincoln gave this speech, civil war would break out between the northern and southern states, and it would end four years later with the South running away with its tail between its legs. Why did the South lose the war? The South entered into the Civil War unprepared to fight and, ultimately, was starting a fight it was destined to lose. In the end, there were five factors that led to the defeat of the South: The fundamental economic superiority of the North, a basic lack of sound military strategy strategy in the way the South fought the war, the inept Southern performance in foreign affairs, lack of a dominating civilian leader in the South, and President Abraham Lincoln (Hersch, 2002).…

    • 2026 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before Lincoln became president, there was already much sectional tension between the North and the South, mostly over slavery. While slavery was illegal in most Northern states, it was still the basis of the South’s economy. The main issue was over slavery in the new territories gained through compromises and the Mexican war. At first, the Missouri Compromise temporarily solved the problem, by making it so that in every territory slavery would be illegal, and in return the North would enforce a stricter slave fugitive law. However, this was overthrown by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, ruining the temporary peace. These acts made it so that slavery in the areas would be decided by popular sovereignty, which meant that the people living there voted on it. The North was outraged and began to fight for abolition. When the South’s candidate John Bell lost to Lincoln, several states seceded, because he threatened their slavery-based economy. By the time Buchanan’s term ended and Lincoln took office, there were already seven states that had seceded.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sectionalism Dbq

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the mid nineteenth century, sectionalism was increasing, drawing further tension between the north and the south. The Civil War was approaching, as disagreement occurred in the newly occupied territories in the west over slavery law. In 1860, Abraham Lincoln won the election and became president. Lincoln campaigned with a stance that would not allow slavery in the west, but would not remove slave state’s pre-existing laws. Many southern slave states believed the government was pro-north and did not consider the interests of the south, leading to their succession into the Confederate States of America. The main objective of the civil war was to reunite the south with the rest of the union North, while the south was fighting for expansion of state’s rights, with a focus on pro-slavery law. In 1865, Lincoln sent ships to towards the south. This action acted as a catalyst, and the confederacy declared war on the union. By 1863, the Confederate had collapsed economically and diplomatically.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays