Preview

Civil Disobedience In The Civil Rights Movement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
795 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Disobedience In The Civil Rights Movement
A free society dictates what they believe is morally right and wrong; the free society constructs a code of acceptable behavior formed around the beliefs of its members. Many people willingly choose to follow the societal rules mapped out before them simply because of their ability to classify right and wrong. Nevertheless, there are the few outliers that set aside the black-and-white good and bad distinction in a free society and pursue their own rules, frequently ending in jail time. Often times, this black-and-white distinction begins to merge, and the beliefs of the people are far to the left and right and everywhere in between. In a society that has no military regiment dictating choice, the people find themselves differing vastly in their …show more content…
The act of civil disobedience cannot be damaging to the free society if the protest remains peaceful, for peaceful protest is a simple right of the people in our society. The height of civil disobedience was arguably the Civil Rights Era. At this time, peaceful protest demonstrated the right of the people against an injustice. The Montgomery bus boycotts were peaceful economic protest. The marches from Selma to Montgomery were nonviolent demonstrations. Greensboro sit-ins were pacific acts of rebellion. What was the ultimate resolution to this entire passive backlash toward a plaguing injustice? The Civil Rights Act of 1964. The 1960s and the years before displayed a common mindset among the society: a division of intelligence and capability based …show more content…
When people refuse to follow a law or order, it seems fairly threatening to societal stability. Today, civil disobedience remains. It is simply a corner stone of free society, for a truly liberated society acknowledges the human right to opinion, views, and protest. When our current government in the United States proposes a law or a change of some sort (such as newly elected Donald Trump’s plans of an executive action to defund Planned Parenthood) the people have a right to exert their rights and protest, so long as it remains peaceful. Violent protests are not a right; violence upon others has never been a human right save for cases of self-defense. If people do not agree with Trump’s plans to cut funds to Planned Parenthood, they deserve a chance to be heard. The very recent women’s rights marches largely focused on this matter. The Keystone Pipeline controversy serves as a modern example of civil disobedience by passive protesting. In no way did the people’s camping on the site of this pipeline harm our society. This protest may harm business or government plans, although it will never negatively affect our culture. There are countless acts of civil disobedience that have no moral purpose; nonetheless, we acknowledge the good the civil disobedience does for our humanity, often righting the vigorous wrongs that were merely accepted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    All American citizens give up some of their personal liberties for the good of society: it is the basis of the constitution and every law. When citizens feel a law is unjust, they have two options: follow it or fight it. While the usual method of fighting it involves legal challenges or petitioning legislators, civil disobedience has achieved much notoriety after its famed success during the Civil Rights movement. The Framework for a Free Society describes a free society as one in which government “is constrained by the rule of law under which every individual and entity is treated equally.” A free society stresses toleration and respect of differences in belief and culture. Thus, peaceful resistance positively impacts a free society as it…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without civil disobedience it’s impossible to see where we would be today. The first act of civil disobedience was the Boston Tea Party. On December, 16, 1773 the group Sons of Liberty created a political demonstration against the Tea Act. The Tea Act was an unfair tax used to make us pay for their war. This is one of many times we were treated differently and unfairly than citizens living in Britain. The act of throwing tea into the harbor ignited tension for more people to protest and overthrow the…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is civil disobedience? It can be defined as the active nonviolent refusal to obey a law that is deemed to be unjust (Boss, 2012). DeChristopher, a climate-change activist, was convicted of bidding on oil and gas leases in a 2008 federal auction. A jury found that he defrauded the federal government, running up a $1.8 million tab he could not pay (The Salt Lake Tribune, 2011). As a result of DeChristopher’s civil disobedience, the oil and gas leases he bid on were later deemed inappropriate for drilling and withdrawn from future auctions.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Obedience shines a light on the negative aspects of humanity, whereas disobedience shines a light on the positive. It has been revealed how people will deny their own senses in order to remain indifferent from the majority (Asch). It was also exposed that some people are okay with possibly killing another human being as long as the victim is not considered their responsibility (Milgram). Both of these examples were a response of the individuals who chose to conform and obey rather than know the difference of what is morally right and wrong. Yet in the midst of it all areas of disobedience allows for different groups of people to come together and fight to evoke incredible change. However, disobedience is much more expensive than obedience. People willing to disobey must first find factors that will lead them to want to disobey and then pay the consequences after. On the other hand, suffering the consequences is a small price to pay compared to living with years of injustice. The factors that were discovered to aid in a person’s willingness to disobey, deception, education, and responsibility, all stimulate a certain degree of reflection. In contrast, members subject to obedience follow blindly with no reflection on the authority’s demands. This evidence directly relates to the findings by both Asch and Milgram. In their cases, the subjects were stripped of their individuality, which resulted in their conformity.…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It becomes a kind of despotism where we seek to silence rather than engage.” Civil disobedience is a necessary part of free society, as it provides an avenue from which all people can make themselves heard, regardless of political power or economic status. Furthermore, it is necessary to keep the spirit of the first amendment alive, as peaceful protest is a way in which people exercise their right to free speech; without peaceful resistance to laws, little progress would be made in a free society, and the views of the majority would be imposed on the rest of the population. Acting as a catalyst for change, peaceful resistance one ingredient of the recipe that drives a free nation towards growth and…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The American government never thought their people would ever go against the laws they thought were fair and civil. As far back to the mid 1800’s society has always showed signs of being civil and disobedient at the same time. Until Henry David Thoreau came into the mix with a dislike of having to pay taxes on something he did not believe in. Henry knew his rights as an American and under stood his first amendment and sought action. Henry David Thoreau wrote “Civil Disobedience” during the Mexican War in 1846 a time when many people from the north thought the war was a stratagem to aid the spread of southern slavery.”Civil…

    • 2487 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some argue that civil disobedience represents a genuine cause, but reject the methods of direct action simply as disruptive, immoral, and an illegal standard to combat inequality. Civil disobedience is stigmatized to be corrupt and ineffective; however, I believe these labels do no justice to the cause the act of civil disobedience embodies. Unfortunately, the reality becomes a simple and cruel true: Justice prolonged is justice denied. Not everyone is granted the luxury of timely inalienable rights. Had it not been for those who protested and engaged in the Boston Tea Party how long would have the conversation or much less the American Revolution been delayed? Had it not been for Rosa Parks and the countless others who engaged in civil disobedience how long would it have been before society was desegregated at the choice of the oppressor? When one engages in peaceful civil disobedience, one is given the platform to address the…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is one way to stabilize communities. Although some have argued the valid point that if you disobey a law whenever you disapprove of it” it can lead to anarchy, with people ignoring laws. In other words, if nobody follows the laws, what's the point of them? The matter of the fact is, everybody doesn’t disobey laws. If you look around today’s society, most people abide by laws and “while many … may be morally justified in disobeying, few ……

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to rules and regulations among society goes down historically as something so inevitably iconic as an occurrence known as civil disobedience. It is no doubt that civil disobedience, the act of opposing a law deemed unjust and peacefully disobeying it henceforth, spurs such great controversy in our society. Civil disobedience impacts society in a positive manner that does not hinder nor deteriorate the good name of the just nation that is home, but moreover poses as an influence for what is better accepted by humans as lawful.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience: conscientious and public opposition of law or government demands to influence legislation of government policy. Coined by the renowned Henry David Thoreau and built upon the freedoms of speech, press, and assembly, civil disobedience is used worldwide by citizens to voice themselves to the government. Breaches of law have not only been prominent in Thoreau’s era, Martin Luther King Jr.’s era, but now, in current opposition against President Trump’s inauguration. As with every controversy, civil disobedience is met with two conflicting sides: is it wrong to break a law in any circumstance or should citizens be allowed to protest to bring change to the government? The core of a democratic-republic country is it’s citizens.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil disobedience is the refusal to obey laws in hopes of changing government laws or policies. Civil disobedience has changed many unjust things for different groups of people it was a major key during…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is a vital and necessary part of life in a democratic system of government. It serves to keep the government from overstepping its bounds. There are times in the history of countries where the governing body has become complacent and has begun to violate the rights of their citizens. Civil disobedience is an effective way of discouraging and preventing such transgressions. Without the threat of dissidence from the public, there is nothing to keep governments honest except for the honor of those governments, which is highly questionable even in the noblest of nations. The role of elected officials in the United States is to represent their constituents, be they from their district, state, or party. If there is nothing to hold these politicians to this purpose, can we truly be sure they are ruling in a representative way and not in self interest?…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History will reveal the major part civil disobedience has played on overcoming governmental injustices. Today, people know Gandhi’s Salt March to Martin Luther King’s demonstrations. Gandhi’s actions helped gain India’s its independence and King’s tactics were instrumental in winning rights for black people in the United States. Others situations include the successful protest of 1998 rioters in Indonesia against the despotic system of government under the Suharto regime.[3] In the US during the early 1900s strikes organized by mistreated workers led to the introduction of labor unions, end of child labor and improved job benefits.[4] Those in the opposite mindset believe that civil disobedience is counter-productive and that the court system should combat unjust laws. However what all these causes listed above has in common was that, “there was no other avenue open to redress grievances” making civil obedience the only way to protest…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that peaceful civil disobedience is beneficial to society. The main reason I believe this is because it brings issues to light that the public would not have known about otherwise. It makes headlines, and if it is truly an issue worth changing then the public will make their opinion known and, if things work out, the underlying issue will be solved. The downside being that the civil disobedience may have harmed business or government briefly by breaking the law. I think that the trade off is worth it, even if nothing gets changed the public is still more aware of what is going on in their government, and that is always a good thing. However, if the civil disobedience becomes violent, it basically always has the opposite effect, and…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil Disobedience

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Civil disobedience is essential to people power movements. Demonstrations and strikes give power to citizens in their dealings with governments. But suck tactics may lead to violence and chaos. Under what conditions, if any, is civil disobedience justified? Is it justified in a democracy like Canada? Was it justified at Tiananmen Square? Explain your answer.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays