Preview

Cherokee Tribe Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
700 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cherokee Tribe Case Study
1
The Removal of the Cherokee Tribe

Since the early 1700’s, land between the Native Americans and the European settlers have been full of constant battles. Population of the Europeans increases as more settlers expand on the economy, making less room for the land to settle on. During the westward expansion, the Cherokees biggest threat comes from Georgia and their persuasion against congress and the desire to run off the Cherokee. Cherokees have been on the American land possible forever and at no stop will Georgia let them have any room on their territory. Because congress was so weak, the desire for Cherokee land was abundant and congress could not help the Cherokee people. As the increase of the United States population
…show more content…
The Cherokee had an agreement on a land cessation in 1819, and it concluded that the Cherokees would cede no more land. Georgia tired to revoke their civil rights so the Cherokee’s had to bring in the United States Supreme Court for protection. “In 1832, when the court ruled in favor of Cherokee sovereignty in Worcester V. Georgia, the state refused to respond to the court’s decision. Furthermore, Georgia went ahead with a land lottery, enacted into law in 1830, that provided for the distribution of Cherokee territory to Georgia citizens…no one seemed to have the power and the will to help the Cherokee.”1 The Georgians were winning leaving little hope for Cherokee …show more content…
There was no persuading the Indian leaders to sell their land to Georgia and move west. But in 1827 all that changed, the Georgia General Assembly ruled that Georgia had complete sovereignty
3
over the land and people within its borders. In section eight of the Georgia State Assembly, it states,”…that it shall not be lawful for any person or body of persons…to prevent any Indian of said nation residing within the chartered limits of this state, from enrolling as an emigrant…”.2 Not even congress would stand up against Georgia, they just let them do what they pleased.

The end of removal resulted in as what was known as the “Trail of Tears”, this is the process of where the Americans began forced removal of the Native Americans. All of this was allowed under the terms and conditions of the Treaty of Echota. The terms stated that, “the Cherokees had two years to move to their new home in the west.”3 During this many Cherokee lives were lost due to the vulnerability to disease and the harsh climate. The estimated death count was close to four thousand Cherokees and was even known to be as much as eight thousand. For those who thought they would be tough and try and stick it out got captured and imprisoned under law. “Many of the Cherokees,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though we are settled here, all this land originally the Indians’ and with this act, we are kicking them off their own land. John Marshall stated, “The Choctaw and Creek were treated horrendously when they moved to the Indian Territory. Their horses were stolen and hundreds died for malnutrition.” (Document 2). The Choctaw and the Creek were treated really badly. They suffered a lot and some of them even died. Honestly, the Cherokee are being smart in not moving to the Indian Territory because they know that they will be treated the same way. The very little trust that the Cherokees had in us is now lost. Mr. Marshall also states, “In the case of Worchester vs. Georgia (1832), the U.S Supreme court ruled that the state of Georgia could not force the Cherokee off their land.” (Document 2). President Jackson is going against the law by supporting the Indian Removal Act. This does not show good presidency. He’s taking hasty decisions because of his bad past with the Indians. The Cherokees are not at fault. If they want to follow their traditions and still live in Georgia, fine. I don’t see why any American has an objection with the Indians staying there not bothering us and we not bothering them. They have a right to this land. Let them…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee Removal

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cited: Perdue, Theda, Michael Green. The Cherokee Removal: A Brief History with Documents, Second Edition. Boston: MA, Bedford/ST. Martin’s, 2005.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971 the Cherokee tribe was in the process of making treaties with United States. The state of Georgia recognized the Cherokee tribe as a nation allowing them to make their own laws and follow their native customs. In the late 1700’s their land started to be invaded by the white man. The Cherokee Indians began to move to Arkansas. (Historical Context) I believe the Indians were taken advantage of and had no option but to move when their land was taken away from them. Georgia and the United States had no regard for the treaties that were put in place. The treaties changed depending on who was in office at the time, the Indians had no choice but to move and give up their land. United States v. Georgia, Chief Justice John Marshall, stated “the Cherokee nation was a domestic independent nation, and therefore Georgia state law applied to them.” When Georgia continued to press the tribe for their land the “Treaty Party” began to make treaties with the federal government to give up their land. The majority of the tribe disagreed with the New Echota treaty where their land was sold for $5 million dollars and the tribe had to move beyond the Mississippi River. Due to corrupt government and the demands of President Andrew Jackson and President Martin Van Buren in 1838, the Indians were “rounded up” and forced off their land and moved to other states.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1800’s when America was still developing as a new country, there were still many conflicts proceeding throughout that period. Andrew Jackson served as the seventh president and his main concern was the removal of the Cherokee tribe from their own land. As a result, the Cherokee people were divided amongst themselves because of this act President Jackson wanted to enforce. While many Cherokee people ignored Jackson’s instructions and stayed on their land, few did go to what is now Oklahoma. Even before they were told to migrate to federal lands, the society of Cherokee was still divided. The money distributed throughout their original land was not equal. The rich got more while the poor got less; much like today, still.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late 1780’s the US began urging the Cherokees to stop hunting and their traditional ways of life and to instead learn about how to live, farm, and worship like Christian Americans. Despite everything the white people in Georgia and other southern states that abutted the Cherokee Nation refused to accept the Cherokee people as social equals and urged their political representatives to take the Cherokees land. The purchase of the Louisiana Territory from France in 1803 gave Thomas Jefferson the chance to relocate the eastern tribes beyond the Mississippi River.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ever since we settled here on this land, we have pushed aside the Native Americans to make room for expansion. The Native Americans have been forced to deal with this new culture moving in by embracing the heritage, combining the two, or fighting back with violence. In 1830, President Andrew Jackson began his Removal Policy and attempted to force all Native Americans from their homes, to west of the Mississippi River. In an attempt to prevent the state of Georgia from taking their land from them, the Cherokee tribe went to court. In Worcester vs Georgia, the court ruled that the state of Georgia had no authority over the territory but Georgia ignored the ruling. The United States Army rounded up the Cherokee and forced them to march west in a movement called the Trail of Tears. The Trail of Tears is a movement that limited the rights of the Native Americans. The Declaration of Independence clearly states that every man has the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Forcing the entire tribe to relocate to a new land is denying the Native Americans of their rights of all three of these things; therefore limited their rights.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act Dbq

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After years of assimilating to White culture and building a successful, independent economy, the question of whether or not Native Americans residing in the southern states and specifically the Cherokee in Georgia should be removed was hotly debated until the ratification of the Removal Act in 1830.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1830's and 1890's proved to be some of the worst times for the Native Americans in U.S. History. In the 1830's, for the most part, Native Americans still lived in their native lands. However, white men considered them a threat to peace. So, in 1838, the Federal government had what they called the "Five Civilized Tribes" removed from their native lands. These tribes were the Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, Creek, and Seminole. They were forced to march 800 miles from their home's to the "Indian Territory", which is modern-day Oklahoma. Under cruel conditions, the army forced the peaceful tribes through the cold, winter weather to their new homes. During this ordeal, known as the "Trail of Tears", over 4,000 Cherokees alone died, out of the 15,000 moved. They died due to disease, exposure, and starvation. Even when the Indian Territory was reached, the US Government was not satisfied. Slowly, more and more of the land was taken away from the Native American's. A government who maintained ideas of equality and freedom, were showing that these ideas obviously did not pertain to everyone. In 1902, several hundred thousand acres were cleared out for white settlers. In 1907, the Indian Nations ceased to exist, and when Oklahoma became a state, all Native American territory was assimilated into the Union.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was a policy established through congress, that allowed the federal government to move the Native Americans out of their lands further west. When white Georgians discovered gold in western Georgia, they requested that the Cherokee Natives be removed so a gold mine could be established. In the Cherokee v. Georgia case, the Cherokee were found, by the Supreme Court, to have their own sovereignty and that the U.S state could not interfere with their land without permission. However, president Jackson disregarded the Supreme Courts decision and revoked the the Cherokee's rights to their land and began their removal. The Nation was forced to travel one thousand miles, leaving Georgia for Oklahoma on a grueling walk…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ones proud people of the Cherokees tribe were forced to leave their homes due to the President of the United States resentful nature towards Native Americans. Brigadier General Winfield Scoot was sent to forcefully remove the Native American from their lands with the help of regiment of artillery, and infantry. By this point in the removal process where troops are on the ground the Native American had no choice but to move or die. Up to 35,000 square miles was forceful taken by the untied states and receive only five million dollars and other land west beyond the Mississippi River. The great Native American people suffered huge set back when they where forced to move to the unfertile land with the useless money that the U.S government gave…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, I would argue that the Cherokee’s should have fought to maintain control of their land. President Adams lost a competition with Georgia which resulted in the action of removing the Cherokee Indian resident. This operation took place in order to benefit from the supplementary terrain for cotton planters. This Indian tribe was one of the first to relocate. The Native American tribe in addition to others had the right to remain in their territory due to the right granted by the treaty in 1825. Although Adams tried to resist the notion of the Indian Removal, he was not able to find a way to stop William McIntosh from continuing with his unjust plan. Cherokee Indians who resided in Georgia constructed a stable and cosmopolitan culture, their…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The proposition calling for equal rights and political democracy of the inhabitants of America were in confutation with the principles calling for the US to follow colonial principles of the European empires that had begun to invade North America in the late 1400s. The colonies that had revolted against British rule in the late 1700s had continued the expansion of settlements and political incorporation that had been practiced since the founding of colonies at Jamestown and Plymouth. The proposal of Indian Removal debated in the US Congress was a straightforward expression of that same expansionism, which dispensed with the past policies of the US that had combined expansion with treaty negotiations that had the form of a meeting and agreements of equals, and proclamations of Indian rights and sovereignty. There was a national campaign developed in support of the Indian resistance, particularly from the Cherokee, that involved diatribes and petitions, public meetings and Congressional debates. The opposition to Removal was advancing principles that in effect called for the US to develop practical policy that was in line with its past proclamations that upheld its treaty commitments to the Indian communities.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Eastern Band of Cherokees resisted termination of tribal status and federal responsibilities in Indian affairs during 1940s and 1950s. “For the Eastern Cherokees, the battle over termination began in January 1947” (Nichols, 328). House Concurrent Resolution 108 was an act that called for the abolition of several Indian offices and termination trust responsibilities for certain specified tribes. The Public Law 280 was passed in 1953, which “transferred civil and criminal jurisdiction over most tribes states to the respective local governments and allowed any states to assume similar jurisdiction over their own Indian reservations” (Nichols, 335). The terminationists noted that the Indians deserved better treatment instead of being second-class citizenship because they served well in the war. They stated the Indians should become part of the mainstream American society.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Longing to gain money and resources in the United States, white settlers grew envious of the remaining acreage owned by the Native Americans. In an attempt to claim the land as their own, the U.S. government announced the Indian Removal Act of 1830 which authorized the exchange of southern Indian territory to land owned by the Europeans West of the Mississippi River (“Indian Treaties and the Removal Act of 1830”). The Indian Removal Act was passed to open up for settlement those lands still held by Indians in states east of the Mississippi River, primarily Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, North Carolina, and others. Jackson declared that removal would “incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier.” Clearing Alabama and Mississippi of their Indian populations, he said, would “enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power” (“President Andrew Jackson”). White inhabitants of Georgia were particularly anxious to have the Cherokees removed from the state because gold had been discovered on tribal lands. Violence was commonplace in Georgia, and in all likelihood, a portion of the tribe would have been decimated if they had not been…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The women and children were driven from their homes. The greedy white men, even went to the graves of the ancestors and dug up any jewelry or ornaments that were buried with the dead (Minges, 467). The twenty thousand Indians were divided into separate groups of equal size of about one thousand (Thorton, 293). Each detachment started at different times, usually one year apart and then the others would accordingly follow. The aged, sick and the young had rode in wagons, which consisted of some goods and bedding (Minges, 467). The others had traveled by foot and this trip was made during the dead of winter. Author Ethan Davis, claims that this particular winter was “one of the coldest periods ever known in the country” (Davis, 100) Many had died from the exposure from sleet or snow. Author Patrick Minges states, “Those who lived to make this trip, or had parents who made it, will long remember it, as a bitter memory” (Minges, 467). A Georgia volunteer was later to say about the cruelty of the Indians, “I fought through the civil war and have seen men shot to pieces and slaughtered by thousands, but the Cherokee removal was the cruelest work I ever knew (Minges, 467)”. The U.S. troops gathered several Indians as well as some African slaves and put them in what is similar to a concentration camp, they were kept as what Minges says “pigs in a sty”…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays