Preview

Chemical Attack on Syris

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
382 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chemical Attack on Syris
CHEMICAL ATTACK ON SYRIA
Over 110,000 people have died in Syria since the beginning of a years-long conflict in the country. On August the 21st, the U.S government says that 1,429 died through the chemical attacks which marked the sea change in foreign policy towards the Middle Eastern country. The impact of poison gas is horrific and fatal. Those exposed to the nerve agent can die within 15 minutes of exposure. Mr. Obama's absolutist position against it is backed up by international law and the United Nations. The 1925 Geneva Protocol prohibits the use of chemical and biological weapons in war. this was reinforced by the 1997 Chemical Weapons Convention, which aimed to eliminate an entire category of weapons of mass destruction, and forced countries involved to destroy all of their production facilities. Only five of the world's countries did not sign the pledge: North Korea, Egypt, South Sudan, Angola - and yes, Syria. However it is still bound by the earlier 1925 protocol. The use of gas in warfare played a huge role in our psychological response to warfare in WW1. It forms the basis of John Singer Sargent's Gassed and is described by Wilfred Owen in his famous poem. "In all my dreams, before my helpless sight, He plunges at me, guttering, choking, and drowning." Even Hitler thought the use of gas in warfare was crossing the line (though he did not see a problem in using it in concentration camps). And it was the British who helped lead the charge against the use of chemical gas after 10,000 British soldiers were gassed in WW1.
No-one denies the use of poison gas is a horrific abuse of human rights. What has changed is our attitude to intervention and perception of appropriate response. Those who supported the vote against intervention in Syria say that launching an attack as punishment for its use is not strategically sensible, in that there is no specific, long-term objective. So what is the alternative to military

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Poison Gas During Ww1

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “ A poison gas attack meant soldiers having to put on crude gas masks and if these were unsuccessful, an attack could leave a victim in agony for days and weeks before he finally succumbed to his injuries.” It was very important that germans had on safety gear. When coming into contact with poison gas even if testing…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Syrian issue can be traced to Bashar al-Assad desire to stop Islamic insurgents and the success of the Arab spring in Egypt that over threw that despot government. This motivated Syrians to protest and seek the removal of Assad’s dictatorial government. To compound matter in Syria Muslims and Christians religiously divide the country. These conflicts resulted in the rise of the free Syrian army, the rebels, who have earned them selves against Assad military. In response president Assad has order swift and cruel attacks on his own people. The attacks quickly moved from traditional military attack to the use of chemical weapon by Assad. The introduction of chemical weapons, where were banned by the UN, the regime of president Assad has violated international law and needs to be brought to justice by the global community.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way war has been fought has drastically changed over time, the tools used to fight it even more so. World War One was the first “modern war” in regards to weapons. One reason is this is the first war in which many things we consider modern war instruments were used. Remarque displays one of the most deadly of these new tools of mass destruction when het states “But that interests us less than what we hear of the new flame-thrower.” (105) The flamethrower was a new weapon used in World War One, and possible one of the most deadly. This weapon was the cause of countless deaths in the war and did so very unforgivingly, ultimately decimating bodies. Another devastating weapon that changed warfare into what we know today was the use of “…mines, gas, tanks, machine-guns…” (132). These are all weapons used to kill solders in another uniform, the enemy. These brutal weapons caused some of the most devastating deaths. Land mines would blow people to pieces if stepped on and making them physically not recognizable. Gas was one of the most gruesome weapons created in world war one. Gas would burn the soldier’s insides till he died…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conflict in Syria has reached a critical point, and we as a nation must make a decision and agree on decisive action. For the past 2 years, over 100,000 people have been killed in the civil war in Syria, by traditional weaponry and more recently, by use of chemical weapons. The role of the Department of Defense is to support U.S. diplomatic efforts in the region, while ensuring that the U.S. Armed Forces remained prepared to protect U.S. interests and uphold security commitments that we’ve made in the region. There are several options available, including working with the United Nations and members of the U.N. Security Council to facilitate the removal of Assad and his chemical weapons stores, but keeping the threat of military action against the Assad regime on the table is vital to preventing the Syrian government from ordering another chemical weapons strike against the civilian population.1…

    • 2024 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chemical warfare takes away many innocent peoples lives. How would you feel if you were killed and you didn't do anything wrong? This tortures people and causes them to get killed for no reason. It takes away peoples family members and many children are forced to live without a mom or a dad. Some familes can not make it without that stream of income so they are forced to live on the street or with other family. This would be a really bad way to grow up. Don't you think?…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Such hype and arrogance led many to believe war was good, inevitable, and would only prove their arrogant belief…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I agree with you; it was not the best choice to make. I do not think the decision should have been made between taking less or more lives, it must have been made on how not to take lives at all. However, by what it is explained the decision of president Truman was the most accurate. I believe that international treaties are generally effective and that the US could try something else instead.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the beginning of time men fought with sticks and stones. World War I brought a step change in technology with the occurrence of poison gas, machine guns, and armored tanks. Previous to World War I foot soldiers and horses were used to advance on the enemy. Chemical warfare had never been used before World War I. With this deadly and often inhuman use of chemical warfare, those exposed died painful and excruciating deaths. The machine gun was invented in 1884 but wasn't used in warfare until World War I. This invention allowed for rapid firing and therefore was able to kill or injure many more enemies during a single battle. The armored tank led to the advancement of heavy gun fire while protecting the gunman. Poison gas, machine guns, and…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    current event

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages

    American diplomacy, backed by the threat of force, is why Syria's chemical weapons are being eliminated." That was President Obama in his State of the Union Tuesday, boasting about what he regards as one of his signature achievements from 2013. Well, not so fast.…

    • 553 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The earliest record of this chemical weapons goes far back to 1000 BC, when the Chinese soldiers used arsenic smoke on its enemies.[4], also in the first and second world wars these weapons were used greatly e.g the Germans used mustard gases at a village in Langemark in 1915, the British and the French also used the weapons in their bomb shells, the war of 1980-1988 (Iran and Iraq) Iraq used nerve agents and mustard gases to kill their enemies [2]. In recent times in 1995 sarin was used in Tokyo attacks of sub way trains, in 2008 ricin was found in a motel room in Las Vegas.[4]. Due to the technological advancement in the chemical industry it has made it easier to access and get hold of these weapons, hence they pose a great threat to humanity now and in the future.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If this was actually true, France should not have bombed Syria in an act of revenge. There was no peace made between the two countries and now that the U.S. is part of this feud, ISIS might try to come after them. I feel that the United States should not be interfering or else more blood will be shed and more innocent lives will be taken. As stated before, the attacks on Paris were not ethical, but they were done for a reason. We should now be trying to figure out what exactly this reason is in order to prevent any more misfortunes from occurring. I do not understand why France thought that bombing Syria would make things even. French president François Hollande said, “We [France] are going to lead a war which will be pitiless” (Staff). War will not make any amends with Syria and in fact will probably cause a lot more destruction than improvements. Some people believe that you need to help yourself first before helping others. I am not exactly sure if that is true, but I do know that starting havoc with other countries because of anger and revenge will not help anyone. The countries that get bombed are going to have to suffer and go through years of reconstruction before reaching its full potential…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kurdish Genocide

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This begun the pattern of the use of chemical weapons by the Iraqi regime indiscriminately…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since the Arabic spring in 2011, the Syrian civil war was still undergoing, most American don’t want lunch war in Syria. According to the ABC news and Washington Post poll, 59% of the American disagree the movement to support the war. Even supplying weapons to Syrian to the Syrian rebels, there are still 70% of people against the opinion. Many people hoped President Obama have debt with the Congress to decide how the next step of Syrian civil war. But even that happen, President Obama and the Congress still have to discuss the chemical issue in Syria and how to deal the problem to punish the regime of Bashar-Al Assad in the future. Some citizens in America thinks that costs too much and sacrifice more people on Syrian war, many biochemical…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While in the 1890’s citizens of the United States would have had little to no qualms about interfering in the country’s affairs, the American public today is more reluctant to jump right in. For example, when “U.S. President Barack Obama tried to drum up momentum for airstrikes in Syria to punish and deter the use of chemical weapons, he failed to gain much of a following”…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is one example of when military force was warranted to ensure the wellbeing of civilians were being considered. Just days before that, the local government decided to use chemical weapons on their own people. In 1925, the Geneva Protocol created a regulation that prohibited the use of chemical weapons on warfare (n.d). Since this country decided to use it on their own people, the United States saw this as a violation and decided to use military force. The local population could not defend themselves so a larger government stepped in to ensure their well-being. This would be a good decision to intervene because the use of chemical weapons should be banned all together. With this situation there are several risks associated with the decision that was…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays