Preview

Weapons Of Mass Destruction Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
775 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Weapons Of Mass Destruction Essay
Question 1.
1. Analyze the history of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), biological weapons, chemical weapons, and nuclear weapons and the future threat of WMD. Weapons of mass destruction
These are weapons which include chemical, biological and radio active (nuclear) weapons, that have the capability to cause death and have extensive harm and destruction to the humans, their structures and the natural environment. The history of WMD would be better described if it is done by analyzing each type of weapons. There are three major categories of weapons of mass destruction these are:-
i. Biological weapons of mass destruction.
This are known as “germ” weapons ,they include the use of ; bacteria,
…show more content…
The earliest record of this chemical weapons goes far back to 1000 BC, when the Chinese soldiers used arsenic smoke on its enemies.[4], also in the first and second world wars these weapons were used greatly e.g the Germans used mustard gases at a village in Langemark in 1915, the British and the French also used the weapons in their bomb shells, the war of 1980-1988 (Iran and Iraq) Iraq used nerve agents and mustard gases to kill their enemies [2]. In recent times in 1995 sarin was used in Tokyo attacks of sub way trains, in 2008 ricin was found in a motel room in Las Vegas.[4]. Due to the technological advancement in the chemical industry it has made it easier to access and get hold of these weapons, hence they pose a great threat to humanity now and in the future. iii. Nuclear weapons of mass destruction.
This involves the use of radio active agents in explosive artillery or weapons such that once released the radio active agents have devastating effect on humans and the environment. The earliest most devastating use of this weapons was in Hiroshima Japan in August 6 1945 and Nagasaki in August 9 1945.[1]. This WMD is the most deadliest amongst the three categories since they have immediate effects and these effects last for a long time. The use of these weapons poses a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Conventional wisdom has it that America was justifiable after all by dropping a lethal bomb on a city full of civilians and soldiers, because their aim was to end the war. However, America was not reasonable by underestimating the human values, not warning them with the presence of an atomic bomb and leaving ever-lasting effects on a city. The atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed 100,000 people. The atomic bomb is described as “the most dangerous threat the world has ever seen” (allvoices, 2011). It literally opened a new era in warfare. Dropping such a bomb can not have any good intentions in it, even though it actually made the war end.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did it occur to you once why do weapons even exist? Have you ever asked yourself what mass destruction weapons are used for? Or what good are they doing for humanity? Weapons of mass destruction are as useless as a roasted pork in Mecca completely and utterly useless, in fact, as it is obvious in the word “mass destruction”, it is only used to kills hundreds of thousands of people and do damage worth millions and millions of pounds.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Some terrorism experts believe that a “Dirty bomb” is a serious and viable WMD threat to the United States. What is a dirty bomb? What is it made of? What sort of safeguards should we place on potential “dirty bomb” materials?…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Nuclear Weapons have strong mass destruction. For example, The United States sent "Little boy", a uranium gun-type fission bomb to Hiroshima, Japan. 3 days Later, The United States sent " Fat Man" in Nagasaki, Japan. More than 10,000 people died from these incidents. In my opinion, Nuclear Weapons didn't kill just people, but their family, their home and their dream.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Govt

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What is the current threat to the United States either biological or chemical weapon? Why…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The development and use of the atomic bomb changed the nature of world warfare forever. Though the bombings of Japan remain the only wartime use of nuclear weapons, since 1945 the threat of nuclear war has loomed over international conflicts, promising a level of destruction never before seen in the…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On the 6th November 1945, a United States bomber flew towards the Japanese city of Hiroshima. The only cargo aboard that B-29 bomber was an atomic bomb – ironically nicknamed “Little Boy” - that was to be dropped on its target. At 8.15am and at a height of around 2,000ft the bomb exploded above Hiroshima, taking 140,000 lives with it. Most of the 140,000 died instantly, horrifyingly the rest of the innocent civilians that were not in direct contact with the bomb died painful deaths in the four months following. They died from radiation sickness and different types of cancers.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    My aim of writing this article is basically not to argue for or against nuclear weapons but perhaps to write about my opinions, reactions, and the environmental impact of nuclear weapons on human lives and non-living organisms on this planet earth; our beautiful environment that make life sustainable. Of course, the impact of nuclear bombs has the capacity or potential of being so catastrophic that it needs to be seriously discussed.…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Essay

    • 432 Words
    • 1 Page

    Towards the end of World War II, the United States began to realize that the war could go on for a long time, and result in the death of millions of soldiers and civilians if they did not take drastic measures soon. They had two choices: one choice was to keep the same strategy they had, and hope for some good luck to end the war, while losing millions of lives, or they had to sacrifice significantly less lives and create a giant bomb. Albert Einstein, the president, and other scientists and government agents decided that choice two was a better way. The United States was completely justified in using the atomic bomb to end the war.…

    • 432 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Albert Einstein once said, “I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones[,]”(Brainyquote). Given that Albert Einstein worked on the Manhattan Project he knew what he was saying. Especially since he knew the destructive force of the weapon he helped create. Although it was not the first, the atomic bomb was a weapon that the world had never seen before. With the ability to wipe out an area in seconds and leave that said area in shambles for years later. This power gave the atomic bomb the title of a weapon of mass destruction. Even though they are one of the newest threats to the world; weapons of mass destruction are the most dangerous and versatile weapons. With many types…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Understanding the terror and recognising of the destruction capabilities of nuclear weapon in the contemporary era can be a challenge to the people of today as the last nuclear weapon detonated in 1945. Subsequently, it is important to observe the historical context of WMD development and study the intention of the WMD. 1940 was the year of the birth of the first nuclear arsenal named as ‘Ivy Mike’. American physicists and their leader Edward teller developed nuclear armaments that was first detonated in 1945, (Balogun, 2011 p.160) which was defined as; extreme scale immediate mass destruction.…

    • 2713 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Biochemical Warfare Essay

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First, There is a wide range of types of biochemical weapons. Biochemical weapons can be viruses, bacteria, and even toxins. One of the most common biological weapons include anthrax, a disease of humans and animals, instigated by the bacterium Bacillus anthracis, a facultative, gram-negative, nonmotile, anaerobic, and spore creating organism. Another highly used biological weapon includes smallpox. The smallpox (variola) virus is the most considerable of the animal viruses. The virus particles are unusually shaped as bricks to ovoid and are indistinguishable from other viruses. The variola virus comprises of double-stranded DNA and has an intricate structure. Another toxin includes botulinum toxin. Botulinum toxin is one of the most deadly substances known to humanity; it is a neurotoxin generated from the bacterium Clostridium botulinum. The toxin interferes with neurotransmission of the brain, causing paralysis throughout the body. Botulinum is also used clinically, but is very unstable; more information is needed about the toxin in order to move further in advancements. In conclusion the variety of weapons is immense because of the natural substances that are converted into lethal threat.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peace - from what source.?

    • 2766 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The use of tanks - planes – submarines – huge fighting ships and deadly gas all provided evidence that the modern weapons of War were now so destructive.…

    • 2766 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear weapons pose a huge danger to humanity, but some people don't understand how they work. A nuclear bomb is a device that harnesses the power of a nuclear reaction and unleashes it. They are usually made from enriched uranium or weapons grade plutonium, and they can be delivered in many different ways, but misses or aircraft deployed bombs are the most common. Nuclear weapons are called weapons of mass destruction for a reason. One small nuclear device is enough to level a city, and potentially kill hundreds of thousands, or even millions, of people. After the blast, a large amount of radiation is released in the form of nuclear fallout. The radiation can remain for tens of thousands of years, and it can cause radiation sickness, cancer and death in humans.…

    • 1816 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term Weapons of Mass Destruction has two indications. In its broader, literal sense, it is used to refer to weapons whose destructive power far surpasses that of guns or conventional explosives. However, the term is more often used in a narrower sense, to refer specifically to nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. Since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, which raised awareness of America’s vulnerability, the United States has greatly intensified its efforts to stop the spread of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons. When the president and other officials refer to “weapons of mass destruction,” they usually mean NBC weaponry. An organism or toxin found in nature is used in them that is meant to kill or incapacitate an enemy. Though there are different types and they are made up of different ingredients, they are all meant to kill and do significant destruction. The United States Military refers to them as "weapons that are capable of high order destruction and being used to destroy large numbers of people." Many countries posses weapons of mass destruction for one main cause. Because they "generate a culture of fear", they are held in reserve by countries as a scare tactic. They are set aside to be used as a threat, if another country were to use them, they would in turn be bombed with weapons of mass destruction. During the Cold War, the term "weapons of mass destruction" was primarily a reference to nuclear weapons. At the time, in the West the euphemism "strategic weapons" was used to refer to the American nuclear arsenal, which was presented as a necessary deterrent against nuclear or conventional attack from the Soviet Union.The term "weapons of mass destruction" continued to see periodic use throughout this time, usually in the context of nuclear arms control; Ronald Reagan used it during the 1986 Reykjavík Summit, when referring to the 1967 Outer Space Treaty. Reagan's successor, George H.W. Bush, used the term in an 1989 speech to the…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays