Preview

Cavour and Realpolitik

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
432 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cavour and Realpolitik
Cavour and Realpolitik
Linda Babb
Humanities 353
Dr. Bard Barkol
November 23rd 2012

Napoleon III agreed to help Cavour in planning Piedmont's war against Austria. The Emperor wanted to drive the Austrians out of Italy once and for all but did not want a revolution because then he would not end up as the legal sovereign of the richest and most powerful half of Italy, and hence would in practice dominate the whole peninsula. Camillo di Cavour wanted the principle of nationalities to be realized and that Savoy, be reunited with France. He wanted The Emperor to supply munitions and aid in obtaining money to support the war effort.

Cavour and Napoleon thought it was important to consider public opinion in devising the grounds for war. They agreed on the grounds of war that would not cause the end result of a revolution of the people of France and too much attention from England. They also did not want to have to fight against England, Prussia or Russia. He counted on apathy from the Prince of Prussia, Russia to keep promises of non-interference and England's neutrality. The Emperor observed that they would have to isolate Austria so that she would be their sole opponent. That was why he deemed it so important that the grounds for war would be such as not to alarm the other continental powers. The two men thought Italy should be organized after the war. The valley of the Po, the Romagna, and the Legations would form a kingdom of Upper Italy under the House of Savoy and reunited with France. Rome and its immediate surroundings would be left to the Pope. The rest of the Papal States, together with Tuscany, would form a kingdom of central Italy. The Neapolitan frontier would be left unchanged. These four Italian states would form a confederation and the presidency would be given to the Pope to console him for losing the best part of his estates. This plan conforms to others to obtain sovereignty and control of Italy with allies in states under The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Italy, the Northern League’s desire for independence was based on the economic difference between the northern Po region and the southern Mezzogiorno. These differences are attributed to core-periphery processes…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Study Guide

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Parma, Modena, Tuscany, and part of Papal States got taken over by nationalists who agreed to ally with Cavour.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fearing that they would lose power, many European countries worked together to crush the French Revolution to lower the possibility of uprisings in their own countries. Austria and Prussia were highly alarmed with the dethroning of the French monarchy, prompting them to urge the French to restore Louis XVI to power. As a result, the Legislative Assembly declared war on the allies. During Napoleon’s rule, Britain, Russia, Austria, and Sweden feared his ambitions to conquer all of Europe and allied against France.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1815, Italy had just emerged from Napoleonic rule and was completely divided into nine separate states; with different rulers and different cultures. By 1848, these states had progressed towards, albeit merely to a limited extent, some kind of national unity – national unity meaning the feeling of being united and together as one country. It could be argued that the lack of success in the reception of Giuseppe Mazzini’s ideas was the most substantial reason explaining this slow progress; though some would say that it was mostly down to factors such as the power and influence of Austria, poor communication within Italy, or its weak military. Through analysing the evidence, it would appear that the main reason for the slow progress of national unity within this time frame was poor communication.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1796, a French leader named Napoleon Bonaparte lead his army to attack Italy. Napoleon was an innovator and an opportunist. Although Napoleon had his own reasons for taking over Northern Italy, France mainly wanted Italy for financial and strategic reasons. At this time, Austria owned a portion of Italy, but France wanted to keep this land from them because “it was an ideal outpost for defense and offense” (Sarti 19). Only a few months into Napoleon’s rule, he had changed the political landscape of Italy which had been in place for years. After the Jacobins took power in Genoa in the north and the Roman Republic replaced papal rule in Rome, the Parthenopean Republic replaced the royal court, who escaped to…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Susan Muthan1

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Though some wanted to stick to tradition, there were some important and influential people who encouraged the unification. Giuseppe Mazzini, attorney, believed that Italy deserved to be a nation and it was about time all the parts of the monarchy to be part of one big republic in unification. Along with Mazzini, Carlo Cattaneo, philosopher and political activist, also believed in the unification of this monarchy would be a right step for Italy. He said that even though it would mix them, it won’t take their culture and traditions off the grid like they believed, but instead, they would all be appreciated and remembered. Vincenzo Gioberti, a priest of Piedmont stated that the unification would actually make the kings stronger without damaging their own independence.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    was extended to the entire boot of Italy to help appease more people in the Republic. While the…

    • 2352 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson knew that war might fracture the new country, which at the time had roughly one thousand men in its army. He was therefore face with not only convincing Napoleon that the United States was ready to fight, but also bluffing him into thinking that they could win that battle.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of English expansion, French anticipating conflict, planted several fortified posts. Early clashes between the two empires begun with King William's and Queen Anne's War. Hostility quickly enlarged between the two and before long both sides where recruiting whatever Indian allies they could. These actions obviously show that both, Great Britain and France knew that major war for North America was unavoidable; as later proved with the seven years war.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lack of cooperation between revolutionaries highlights that individual rulers could easily take back power, and the different ideas meant that people were fighting for different things which would have achieved nothing. There was also no foreign help, as all except one ruler in Italy were foreign and were not willing to give up power and France at the time was protecting the Pope. However, I think that Austria was the main reason why Italian revolutionaries failed. This is because not only did they dominate north Italy and were able to easily crush revolts, but they also play a part in the other factors as well. Other European states would not have wanted to cross Austria as at the time they were a dominating empire throughout Europe. The Austrians also exploited the lack of unity between revolutionaries in order to regain control in the few places that they had lost it. To summarise, we can see that Austria by a long way was the most significant factor for the failure of Italian…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While France and England hoped to expand their empires. Everyone had a part in this,…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prince reflects the context of Florence’s limited military and economic power in a fragmented Italy and threatened by surrounding states and country…

    • 1311 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes no matter how much we are against it, war is necessary. This was the case in America in 1775. Virginian leaders met to discuss the direction our country was headed in. What were we going to do about the conflict with the British? Who was treating us poorly? Some leaders continued peaceful means to resolve conflict. Patrick Henry thought differently. He wrote the famous “Speech of the Virginia Convention” to push for war. Because of how Patrick Henry used appeals and rhetorical devices, he was able to convince the other colonists to go to war with England.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Purchase

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Napoleon wanted to consolidate his resources so that he could focus on conquering England. Believing he lacked the troops and materials to wage an effective war, the French general wished…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics