Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Case Study/Reaction Paper the Stanford Prison Experiment

Good Essays
960 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study/Reaction Paper the Stanford Prison Experiment
| Case Study/Reaction Paper | The Stanford Prison Experiment | |

Reviewing and Analyzing:
The Stanford Prison Experiment

The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted at Stanford University in California from August 14 to August 20, 1971. Led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo, twenty-four male students whom were chosen out of 75, were randomly assigned roles of prisoners and guards, for an investigation into the causes of conflict between military guards and prisoners. According to Zimbardo, this was funded through the US Office of Naval Research and took place out of the basement of the Stanford psychology building which they transformed into a mock prison [ (Stanford Prison Experiment, 2013) ]. The participants, who were chosen, answered a newspaper ad asking for volunteers to help establish psychological effects on those in prison; while being paid $15 per day. [ (Stanford Prison Experiment, 2013) ]. In order to conceal the surroundings of the area, and to make it more believable, the “prisoners” were blindfolded anytime that they left their cell in order to make sure no one could visualize the exit. Prisoners were not addressed by their name, but by their ID numbers; giving them a sense that they were no longer more valuable than the guy in a cell down. Guards wore khaki shirt and pants that were similar to that of an actual prison guard, and mirrored sunglasses to prevent any eye contact. The prisoners on the other hand, wore only a white gown no undergarments, a chain around one ankle, and a stocking cap; made out of women’s leggings. The prison cells were able to hold three prisoners each, and until the study was complete, that is where the participants would spend all day and night. The guards however, worked their eight-hour shifts and were able to go home after every day. On the second day of the experiment, the three prisoners in a cell, blocked their cell door with their beds and took of their stocking caps; refusing to come out. [ (Stanford Prison Experiment, 2013) ] The guards ultimately came up with a decision, and that was to set up a “privilege cell”. The other prisoners, whom were not involved in the riot, were allowed special treatment like better meal quality. This cell allowed guards to once again gain control over the prison. The cell also allowed for the guards to use psychological tactics on the prisoners, calling some “good prisoners” and “bad prisoners” [ (Stanford Prison Experiment, 2013) ]. After only 36 hours, cell mate #8612 began to act crazy. Screaming, cursing, and had a rage out of control. After awhile, the guards and Zimbardo finally were convinced this participant was suffering and they released him [ (Stanford Prison Experiment) ]. Soon, the guards would take their control a little bit further on those still in the study. Making the prisoners repeat daily duties such as cleaning their cell, cleaning toilets without gloves, over and over. This was one a power affect, and two to insure this was their new identity. Punishments for not following the rules included “the hole” and push-ups. The guards became increasingly cruel as the experiment continued. Such as not allowing the prisoners to urinate or defecate anywhere but in a bucket placed in their cell. Sometimes the guards wouldn’t even let the prisoners empty the bucket. Removing mattresses, stripping inmates of clothing, was the guards way of embarrassing the prisoners. Ultimately the participants, the guards, prisoners, and even Zimbardo himself were all into their roles, and their new identities. As superintendent, Zimbardo was soon addressed by parents and even a more outside source on treatments occurring during this study, after a visitation was allowed. Christina Maslach, a graduate student in psychology whom Zimbardo was dating at the time, was the one who questioned its morality. Six days into the two week’s planned duration, the Stanford Prison Experiment was closed [ (Stanford Prison Experiment) ]. The findings were that the situation, rather than individual personalities, caused the behavior of the prisoners and guards [ (Stanford Prison Experiment, 2013) ]. The Stanford Prison Experiment in my eyes, seems like something we all have thought about here and there; “I wonder what I would do if I were stuck in a cell for that long.” While a lot of individuals can argue, the thought has never crossed their mind, a lot of others have wondered. While I believe the conditions may not have been the most proper, in all reality, a lot of the treatment done in the experiment happens in prisons. I find it very interesting to learn from a hands-on experience. I can understand the debate on this study due to the psychological affects it took on the participants, but I find more and more that sometimes, a study needs to be accurately done, in order to get the best results. While I do not favor the treatment, I also realize that in prisons, it can become much worse than the situation these volunteers were put through. Riots, stabbings, suicides, prison “gangs”, even rape occurs. The treatment that occurs in most prison systems is a debatable topic itself, because they are there for breaking the law, sometimes even harming another individual is the reason, therefore a lot of us become numb to the knowledge of what actually occurs behind the walls. The Stanford Prison Experiment for me was a learning opportunity. I find that a lot of people could really learn something from researching this topic. Control is not always at the grips of our own hands, sometimes our mind decides to take over; creating a new identity, good or bad.

Works Cited
Stanford Prison Experiment. (n.d.). Retrieved from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment
Stanford Prison Experiment. (2013, February 6). Retrieved February 14, 2013, from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment

Cited: Stanford Prison Experiment. (n.d.). Retrieved from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment Stanford Prison Experiment. (2013, February 6). Retrieved February 14, 2013, from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment that Philip Zimbardo evented. He wanted to study the human response of captivity, of the prison life. Zimbardo randomly assigned roles to the prisoners and the guards. Each role was uniquely identified. For example, he gave the guards sticks and sunglasses and the prisoners were arrested by the police department and were forced into the basement of the jail which was converted into the psychology department that was converted into a makeshift jail. Zimbardo wanted the experiment to be as realistic as he possibly could have made it, therefore, he assigned each role to help do so. Testing each individual and then assigning them to roles would of gave inconclusive readings and therefore, it was…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment took place during the summer of 1971 and was led by Stanford University professor, Philip G. Zimbardo (Zimbardo). The experiment was done to evaluate the psychological effects of guards and prisoners (prisonexp). In order to test this, Zimbardo decided to create a mock prison in a hall of the Stanford psychology building (prisonexp). This was a costly affair and to afford the experiment, Zimbardo was funded by the U.S. Office of Naval Research, who was also interested in the science behind the conflict between guards and prisoners (bbcprsionstudy). The Stanford Prison Experiment originally was conducted to study the relationship betweens guards and prisoners, but by the conclusion of the experiment it was obvious…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When people are given little to no direction or training, and are faced with dealing with people they may perceive as a threat to their own safety and the well-being of others, they have a propensity to overstep what most would consider reasonable behavior. The “guards” in the experiment were put into a position of authority and took the steps they deemed necessary to maintain order. In spite of the fact that they knew it was an experiment, they were immersed in the situation and played the role given them. The “prisoners” played their part and were so wholly immersed in the role and the environment that their entire perspective of reality was altered. They began to believe they were helpless and unable to help themselves out of the situation they found themselves. They had become powerless to change the situation, in spite of the fact that it was just an…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A controversial experiment by Zimbardo (1971) (Spoors et al.) shows how a groups of males were separated into two groups of guards and prisoners in a make shift prison. After six days of a two week experiment it was stopped. The guards became abusive while the prisoners showed signs of emotional disturbance.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment began just like any other, with a general question: “Would a negative environment would be able to control…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillip K. Zimbardo, who is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, directed the Stanford Prison Experiment, also known as the Zimbardo Experiment. The goal of the Zimbardo experiment was to research how willing human beings would imitate to the characters of correctional officers and inmates in an acting role that replicated life behind bars. But what really happens when you remove the freedoms of human beings and place them in subservient positions and place them in jail cell type settings? The answer is that the mind and physical well-being is drastically and forever changed for the worse, which Mr. Zimbardo’s tests proved.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A team at Stanford University, led by Phillip Zimbardo, conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment to investigate causes of conflict between military guards and prisoners. Zimbardo and his team were seeking to observe the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards and see if this was the chief cause of abusive behavior in these settings (Haney, Banks, and Zimbardo, 1973). This study is one that is well know and well-recognized. Zimbardo and his study are often discussed in many psychology courses today, and have even caused reform in prison systems as well as IRB/APA ethical committees.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was created by a psychology teacher named Phillip Zimbardo. There was 9 prisoners and 9 guards. Those that were chosen were arrested one morning and taken to the station where they were blindfolded. An ad was put in the local paper asking for volunteers for this project. This experiment was to see the psychological effects of being in prison. After reviewing over 70 applicants, they narrowed it down to twenty-four candidates. The candidates were college students from the United States and Canada, they also earned $15 a day. They were separated in two different groups labeled guards and prisoners. On the first day, there were no differences between the boys. Zimbardo used the basement in Stanford’s psychology department and called it the “Stanford County Jail.” The corridor was called the “yard” the prisoners were allowed to walk, eat, or exercise. The cells were created out of laboratory rooms. The doors were replaced with steel bars. There…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to continue the experiment, deception and manipulation had to be used on the prisoners and their families. The basement was cleaned, rearranged and made presentable for outsiders. The prisoners were groomed, feed a hot meal and warned about not complaining when the families arrived or the visit would be cut short. The families were greeted by Susie the receptionist to keep up appearances and to entertain for an additional thirty minutes as they continued to prepare. Even though the prisoners were only allowed two visitors, for ten minutes while the guards watched, the families left content. Rumors begin to circulate that prisoner 8612 was planning to come back with a crowd and force the release of the remaining prisoners. Zimbardo had no choice but to send the students to another location, in case anyone showed up. Even though no one showed up, someone was going to pay for the hard work that the guards put in. With no surprise, day four came with an increase in humiliation, dehumanization and more unnecessary punishment to the prisoners. On top of regular work, they were forced to shine the guard’s shoes. The guards were taking their roles in the experiment very seriously. They were not tolerating any disrespect and had no problems asserting their superiority over the prisoners. Almost everyone was falling in line and accepting their order except prisoner 819. He did not partipcate in the 6 am count and refused to exercise. Going even further, he trashed his cell and barricaded himself in. He was not punished by himself but also the other prisoners. Eventually, he was thrown into the hole. A priest came to visit, and accessed the situation. Prisoner 819 agreed to meet with him, and broke down. It was so severe that he was taken away to be comforted with food and rest. The priest advised them that their stimulation was very convincing and was similar to a prison with first time offenders. Around 11:30 pm the guards gathered the…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo Prison Eperiment

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The experiment took place in the basement of the Psychology department in Stanford University and selected 24 undergraduate students out of 70 volunteers due to their lack of psychological issues and had no criminal record. Zimbardo paid each of the 24 participants 15 dollars a day in a span of one to two weeks. The 24 volunteers were randomly assigned to play a role as either a guard or a prisoner. The cell was made up of three prison cells, each one holding three mock prisoners. The guards chosen had to work in an eight hour shift alongside two other participants. The guards chosen have their own cell to themselves and one small room for solitary confinement. Kendra Cherry stated in her article that, “According to Zimbardo and his colleagues, the Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrates the powerful role that the situation can play in human behavior” (Cherry). The volunteers for this experiments took on their role almost instantaneously.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those involved had forgotten they were playing a role. The prisoners were "behaving in pathological ways" and no longer realized that they were free to quit at anytime (Zimbardo, 2006). The guards had either become sadistic or allowed the behavior, believing that they were unable to do anything about it; and as previously stated, even the researchers playing a role had begun to lose their grip on reality (Zimbardo, 2006). This experiment showed just how detrimental inhumane prison conditions were to the health of everyone in the prison system from Super-Intendents to guards and prisoners.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Zimbardo’s experiment, he had two different groups of people, the prisoners and the guards. Zimbardo’s experiment was considered to be a mock prison in the basement of…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zimbardo Research Paper

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was a study conducted in 1971 by Dr. Phillip Zimbardo. According to Dr. Steve Taylor (2007), “It’s probably the best known psychological study of all time.” (Classic Studies in Psychology, 2007). Zimbardo stated that the point was to see what would happen if he put “really good people in a bad place” (Dr. Zimbardo, 2007). He did this during a time were most college students were protesting for peace and were against anything authoritarian. The experiment contained both positive and negative aspects; which will be discussed further in this paper.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Stanford County Prison experiment by Zimbardo (1971) supports Milgram’s study. Zimbardo (1973) experiment took place in a pretend prison house which was created in the basement of Stanford University. This was to investigate the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner/prison guard. Participants in both studies had a difficult time ending the experiment. The participants felt they did not want to appear inconsistent or leave the experiment. Participant’s behaviour was in control by social/professional forces and environmental contingences, rather than their own personality traits or character power.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Watch the video on the Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment available in the Webliography (Quiet Rage http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/quiet-rage-the-stanford-prison-experiment/). In your Threaded Discussion, worth 20 pts, post your thoughts regarding the following discussion questions excerpted from Zimbardo:…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays