Preview

Caribbean Court of Justice

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
815 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Caribbean Court of Justice
Despite the fact that a large majority of Caricom countries have signed on to the Original
Jurisdiction of the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) since its establishment on 14 February 2001, only three so far, namely, Barbados, Guyana and Belize have acceded additionally to its Appellate
Jurisdiction. The Original Jurisdiction deals with the interpretation and application of the Treaty which established Caricom, and the Appellate Jurisdiction is meant to take over the role of the
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council by being the final court of appeal in both civil and criminal matters The present concept of the Privy Council was established in the UK by the Judicial Committee Act of
1833 for the main purpose of processing final appeals from Commonwealth countries and UK dependent territories. The UK itself does not use the Privy Council as a final court of appeal in the normal civil and criminal cases, as do the commonwealth countries and dependent territories, but has its own final Court of Appeal. This arrangement for Commonwealth countries, including countries of the Caribbean, served a useful purpose. As time went on however, quite a number of countries like Australia, Canada, Sri Lanka,
Malaysia and Singapore, after gaining independent status, established their own final Courts of Appeal and terminated the services of the Privy Council. Most of the independent Caribbean countries are among the last of the original group which still cling on to the apron strings of the Privy Council.
It now seems that in recent times the law lords in the Privy Council are becoming extremely wary of prolonging the services of the Privy Council to Commonwealth countries. In 2009, the President of the UK
Supreme Court, Lord Nicholas Phillips, was quoted in the Financial Times Newspaper as expressing grave concern about the significant amount of time which the Privy Council Law Lords utilize in tending to the appeals of Commonwealth countries. It seems

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    12. What office in the government of Great Britain is not limited to serve any certain number of years?…

    • 2141 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The house of lords is the upper chamber of the Uk’s bicameral parliament, Beginning in the the 11th century. The house of lords’ role in government is to work with the house of commons to; make laws, check and challenge the actions of government ( the house of lords has no veto power) and provide independent competence. Firstly, in 1999 the Labour party under Tony Blair as Prime Minister reformed the house of lords. For centuries the house of lords consisted of members that inherited their seats, the Act removed such right. The act reduced members of the house of lords from 1,330 members to 669 members and a proportion of the members that are ‘cross benchers’ members with no party affiliation. In order for this act to receive supported votes, Tony Blair and the labour party passed the Weatherill Amendment that put in place a deal that allowed 92 of the 669 members to remain heredity. The reforms in houses of lords progressive towards democracy due to the fact that Historically, members of the House of Lords have been the richest and most important landowners in the country, who would pass their peerages down through their family, which creates bias towards the wealthy. By…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    the chief officers of state: Lord Chancellor, John Morton, the Lord Privy Seal Richard Fox, the Lord Treasurer, John, Lord Dynham…

    • 1900 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Lenz, M. (2006). Lawyers weigh in on changes to law. The Exeter News-Letter. Retrieved on January 10, 2007 from www.seasoastonline.com/news/exeter/08222006/nhnews-x-sentencinc0822.html…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They are often academics, and are appointed to assist with particular inquiries of the committee. This, in theory, would increase the expertise of the committee members, allowing for more effective scrutiny of the department area. Since 1979, the number of Departmental select committees has fluctuated (Norton, 2007). In 1994 for instance, pressure from the Ulster Unionist party led to the creation of a Northern Ireland Select Committee (ibid). Party loyalty and the Whipping system may mean than bills are not being scrutinized to Westminster’s full potential.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study Ethics

    • 913 Words
    • 13 Pages

    a) Is Weinhardt subject to the FCPA based on the facts of this case? Yes or…

    • 913 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    circumstances under which a resulting trust arises. It held that such a trust must be intended, or must be…

    • 9288 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fusion Fallacy

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Prior to the enactment of the Judicature Act 1873, the administration of common law and equity was completely separated. The principles of equity developed in the Court of the Chancery where a ‘petitioner could seek relief from the harsh or unjust operation of the law’.[3] The Chancery Court was a court of conscience charged with ‘an extraordinary power to prevent the injustices and supply the deficiencies that were perceived in the operation of the Common Law’.[4] The disadvantage of this system was that courts of law refused to recognise equitable rights or interests. The Judicature Act 1873 was enacted in order to merge the administration of law and equity. The effect of the Act was the abolition of the old courts and the creation of a new High Court of Justice that combined the jurisdiction of the old courts.[5] The judicature system was implemented in WA by enacting in the Supreme Court Act 1880 (WA) provisions equivalent to the Act. These provisions are now located in sections 16(1), 24 and 25 of the Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA).…

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the creation of the Ministerial Code ‘Ministers of the Crown are expected to behave in a way that upholds the highest standards of propriety.’ It may have clarified what Ministers should and shouldn’t do but greater effectiveness has not been achieved since the consequences remain non-legal. The code has led to the creation of the new convention, that the rules of the code should be followed.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past. And judging by the past, I wish to know what there has been in the conduct of the British ministry for the last ten years to justify those hopes with which gentlemen have been pleased to solace…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States court system is a dual system composed of Federal and State and Local courts, with the ultimate court being the U.S. Supreme court where both systems can connect.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Bellitto, Christopher M, The general councils: a history of the twenty-one general councils, (Paulist Press, 2002)…

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) is an independent body that was set up in March 1997 in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, under the Criminal Appeal Act (CAA) 1995. This body in the past was an experiment which could challenge a criminal conviction or sentence after the court process has finished and it still exists in the present in the English Legal System. This Commission can refer possible cases of miscarriages of justice to the attention of the Court of Appeal to prevent the possibility from miscarriages of justice that had occurred in cases like the Birmingham Six and the Tottenham Three. However, the Criminal Cases Review Commission does not have main power to carry out investigation and instead they rely on the police for this aim; this is doubtful whether the commission is fully effective (Slapper, G. and Kelly, D. 2012-2013).…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The famous work on the British Constitution by Walter Bagehot embodied a classic conception of the office which has informed many traditional textbook versions of British politics. This involved the idea of the PM as essentially a chairman of the nation’s most important committee, engaged in a constant search for consensus. The term ‘primus inter pares’- first amongst equals - used to describe a reality but could not now be said to do so.…

    • 3362 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cabinet

    • 2828 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The Cabinet of the United Kingdom is the collective decision making body of Her Majesty’s Government of the United Kingdom, composed of the Prime Minister and Cabinet Ministers, the most senior of the government ministers. The Cabinet is the ultimate decision-making body of the executive. But this Cabinet system did not shape in today’s form overnight. According to Sidney Low, “Cabinet is the responsible executive having the complete control of the administration of the general direction of national business, but exercising this vast power under the strict supervision of the representative Chamber to which it is accountable for all its acts and omissions.”…

    • 2828 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays