Capital Punishment And Teen Killers: Article Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
If a child commits a serious crime like murder, robbery, or arson, should they go to jail? For some time now, supreme courts point out that some juveniles who commit crimes should not go to jail. Others would argue otherwise. Someone who views an act of crime as simply an act of crime would agree that a child who commits a crime would not be a child anymore. The Supreme Court defends the juveniles attempting to justify their actions as naïve like, and that sentencing them to a life sentence without parole is unconstitutional. I believe in the minority group that argues with Supreme Court justices on why they should be sentenced to prison for long periods of time. It’s never easy to accept the fact that a child can commit a serious crime. The reality is, it happens all over America and it has to be stopped before it starts to spread. The article, “On Punishment and Teen Killers” by Jennifer Jenkins is a more personal stance on the minority side of the situation, but it is the truth. Jenkins argues that The Supreme Court allows the underdeveloped brain theory apply to a situation like murder. This is the argument in Jensen’s case. In the article Jensen states “If brain development were the reason, then teens would kill …show more content…
“They’re not acting on impulse”. According to Paul Thompson who wrote the article, “Startling finds on teenage brains”. This discusses the development of the adolescent brain and how teens who commit crimes are doing it out of some sort of peer pressure or naivety. Thompson’s states, “brain cells and connections are only being lost in the areas controlling impulses, risk-taking, and self-control. These frontal lobes, which inhibit our violent passions, rash actions, and regulate our emotions, are vastly immature throughout the teenage years.” Thompson argues this with the minority group who believe that teens who commit crimes should go to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jenkins states “The nationwide campaign to end JLWOP has spent millions of dollars advocating for these convicted murderers to be set free. Not a dime has been allocated for victim outreach or support.” While the teen killer gets set free the family of the victims do not get any closer. The killer gets a second chance in life but the victim had their life taken away from them. We can not turn a blind eye to the victim’s family just because the person who took their life was under the age of…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These children who do change their life normally never have a problem with the law again. But others argue that some children are just “hopelessly defective”. In the article On Punishment and Teen Killers written by Jennifer jenkins she states that “The offender in our case was a serial killer in the making.He came from privilege.Whenever he got in trouble his parents fixed it.And after a series of other crimes he planned the murders for months” What she is trying to convey is that the children who…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article, “On Punishment and Teen Killers” (2011), Jenkins uses the weakest ethos when she argues, teens who commit heinous crimes should receive life without the possibility of parole, and that victims’ rights should be considered. Jenkins is a high school teacher who was a victim. In the light, she works with teenagers which gives her a small amount of credibility, but on the contrary, her sister and unborn child were murdered by an adolescent. Be as it may, this gives her a biased opinion…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the article “ On punishment and Teen killers” By Jennifer Jenkins talks about how this teenager has killed a Woman, when she was pregnant which she begged for the life of her unborn child but the teen was eager to feel how it would be to shoot someone and he right there shot her to death. Which now the teenager has been sentenced to three life sentences in prison.He is not the only one dealing with teenage killer crimes but there are about 1,300 cases nationally that have sentenced teenagers as…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” ,written by Jennifer Jenkins is an article she wrote to inform people about what teenagers have done and to release her thoughts. Jennifer Jenkins is a high school teacher that has a devastating story for her own. Her sister, her brother in law, and her sister's unborn baby were killed by a teenager who just wanted to feel how it is to kill someone. As it seems this has changed her point of view for teenagers even though she was worked with teens all her…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “On Punishment and Teen Killers”, Jennifer Jenkins claims that people feel bad for the teens that are getting life sentences for murdering someone, but there is no regard for the victims’ families. This article has the weakest ethos out of all of them. The author first develops her credibility when she quotes an expert named James Q. Wilson, Harvard Professor, and Crime Expert. This technique builds her credibility because her research is now coming from an expert, and this makes…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Capital Punishment: Moral, Effective, or Barbaric? Debra Johnson PHI103 Informal Logic Instructor: Philip Bence June 11, 2013 Capital Punishment: Moral, Effective, or Barbaric? Public support for capital punishment has eroded across the nation, largely because Americans are ambivalent. Many think that capital punishment is acceptable, but they are apprehensive about innocent people being executed. As the political debate of the past two decades centered on wrongful convictions and…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In an article written by Marc Hyden he states, ?Submitting the power to kill U.S. Citizens to the State is unwise considering [the] history of error and malfeasance? (1). Hyden is saying that to allow the State to determine whether someone should die or not is not a smart idea. People make mistakes; it?s what they do. But when it comes down to making a mistake about sending an innocent person to death, that is a mistake that you cannot undo or make right. In this article by Hyden, he talks…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Irwin March 14/11 Tommy Douglas’ “Capital Punishment” focuses on the negatives aspects of the death sentence in Canada. “I am in favour of the motion to abolish capital punishment and I am also supporting the amendment to put it on a five-year trial basis” (Tommy Douglas 558). Being a person who lives abroad in the public with millions of others, I must say I disagree with Douglas’ argument as to abolishing the punishment, as I feel having capital punishment would indefinitely reduce the murder…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    capital punishment

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Capital Punishment In 1941, Eithel Lita Juanita Spinelli was the first woman to die in the gas chamber in San Quentin Federal Prison. Juanita, a former gang member, whom was known as “The Duchess”, was charged with first degree murder. Juanita, her husband Michael Simeone, Robert Sherrard, Gordon Hawkins, and Albert Ives were all members of the same gang. They constantly went out and committed robberies. One day as they met for a picnic, fellow gang members brought up that Sherrard had been “talking…

    • 2190 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays