Preview

Caperton v. Massey Case Brief

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
815 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Caperton v. Massey Case Brief
Hugh M. Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Company, Inc.
556 U.S.868
U.S. Supreme Court
June 8, 2009

Facts: Hugh Caperton, C.E.O. of Harman mining (here on labeled as Caperton), filed a lawsuit against A.T. Massey Coal Company (here on labeled as Massey) alleging that Massey fraudulently canceled a coal supply contract with Harman Mining, resulting in its going out of business. In August 2002, a Boone County,West Virginia jury found in favor of Caperton and awarded $50 million in damages. Massey went on to appeal to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. During the interlocutory period Don Blankenship, C.E.O. of A.T. Massey Coal Company was involved in a campaign for the election of State Supreme court candidate Brent Benjamin against incumbent Justice Warren McGraw. Blankenship invested over $3 million in Benjamin's campaign through a non-profit organization called "And For The Sake of The Kids". Mcgraw lost to Benjamin in November 2004. When the case came before the West Virginia Supreme Court in 2007 the court ruled in favor of Massey and overturned the $50 million verdict in a split 3 to 2 decision. Caperton sought rehearing and the parties moved for disqualification of three of the five justices who decided the appeal. Photos had surfaced of Justice Spike Maynard vacationing in the French Riviera while the case was pending. Justice Maynard recused himself after possible bias due to friendship was brought into argument. Next, Blankenship petitioned for Justice Larry Starcher's recusal after the two shared a public feud over Blankenship's role in the 2004 elections. Caperton petitioned for the recusal of Justice Benjamin because of Blankenship's monetary contributions to his election campaign. Justice Benjamin declined, but Caperton was given a rehearing. In April 2008, the court again ruled in favor of Massey with Benjamin again joining the 3-2 majority. Caperton filed a petition with the United States Supreme Court concerning Blankenship's contributions

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Professor Swenson Criminal Law November 27, 2012 McCleskey v. Kemp Mr. McCleskey was a Black man, that was convicted of two counts armed robbery and one count of murder in the Supreme Court of Fulton County, Georgia. His convictions were due to the robbery of a furniture store and the killing of a white police officer while the robbery was occurring. There was evidence presented at trial that proved one of the bullets to be from a .38 caliber Rossi revolver, which fit the description of the gun McCleskey was carrying, and two witnesses who had heard McCleskey had admitted to the shooting.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Plessy v. Ferguson case in 1896, the statement of “separate but equal” was created, preventing African Americans from achieving equality. In 1951 in Topeka, Kansas, a girl named Linda Brown was forbidden from attending Summer Elementary school, which was the school closest to her home, due to the color of her skin and was instead forced to go to a school for African American children much farther away. With the help of the NAACP, the National Association of the Advancement of Colored People, and Thurgood Marshall, her father, Oliver Brown, filed a lawsuit against the Topeka Board of Education. The Court spent four terms making their final decision, which came in 1954, banning segregated schools and getting rid of the whole “separate…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atkins v. Peak, 514 N.E. 2d 850 (1987) Decision by Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Facts: On March 20, 1982, plaintiff Marybeth Atkins sustained serious injuries while skiing at Jimmy Peak Ski Resort. On December 5, 1984 plaintiff Marybeth Atkins sued defendant Jimmy Peak. Plaintiff alleged that her injuries were caused by defective ski equipment she had rented from the rental facility on the premises. She further alleged that the defendant failed to inspect ski equipment and the failure amounted to negligence and breach of contract. An amended complaint was filed on February 14, 1986, the plaintiff added counts that the defendant had breached warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The defendant moved for summary judgment which was granted by a judge of the Superior Court on the ground that the plaintiff’s action was barred by the statute of limitations. The case was transferred to Massachusetts’s Supreme Court by its own motion.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tennessee V. Garner

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Name: Tennessee v. Garner Citation: No. 83-1035, 83-1070 (1985) Facts: On October 3, 1974, Memphis Police Officers Hymon and Wright were dispatched to answer a "prowler inside call." When the police arrived at the scene, a neighbor gestured to the house where she had heard glass breaking and that someone was breaking into the house. While one of the officer radioed that they were on the scene, the other officer went to the rear of the house hearing a door slam and saw someone run across the backyard. The suspect, Edward Garner stopped at a 6-feet-high fence at the edge of the yard and proceeded to climb the fence as the police officer called out "police, halt." The police officer figured that if Garner made it over the fence he would get away and also "figured" that Garner was unarmed. Officer Hymon then shot him, hitting him in the back of the head. In using deadly force to prevent the escape of Garner, Hymon used the argument that actions were made under the authority of the Tennessee statute and pursuant to Police Department policy. Although the department's policy was slightly more restrictive than the statute it still allowed the use of deadly force in cases of burglary. Garner's fathers' argument was made that his son was shot unconstitutionally because he was captured and shot possessing ten dollars that he had stolen and being unarmed showing no threat of danger to the officer. The incident was then reviewed by the Memphis Police Firearm's Review Board and presented to a grand jury of the Federal District Court and the Court of Appeals. Neither of these presentations of the incident took any action.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Graves v Harris v. Coweta County, No. 03-15094, 433 F.3d 807 (11th Cir. 2005), cert. granted sub nom., Scott v. Harris, 127 S. Ct. 468 (2006)…

    • 3453 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Robey v. Hinners Brief

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Robey v. Hinners Facts: In 2005, Robey who runs his business in Sikeston, Missouri sold a used 2002 Cadillac Escalade to a Kentucky resident, Hinner, over ebay auction. As Robey advertised, the car was “clean, better and average” and with an “ 1 month/1,000 mile Service Agreement”. After Hinner bought the car, he realized that the car was not as advertised. Robey argued that since he was not a resident, and the lack of personal jurisdiction that he should be dismissed.…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cadia Case Analysis

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages

    [ 5 ]. Wade v New South Wales Rutile Mining Co Pty Ltd (1969) 121 CLR 177 at 186.…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decisions: Ruling of the initial appeal of judgment in favor of Totes/Isotoner Corporation for discrimination Allen was affirmed. Subsequently, the Supreme Court of Ohio did not touch the issue of whether…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Constructive Discharge

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Cary v. Carmichael, 908 F. Supp. 1334 - Dist. Court, ED Virginia (1995) Chrysler Corp. v. Mann, 561 F.2d 1282, 1285 (8th Cir. 1977)…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    SUPREME COURT CASE SUMMARY ON ROPER v. simmons 03-633 Case Overview Roper v. Simmons Basics and Facts…

    • 3005 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mann vs. Ford

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mann vs. Ford In late 1960’s Ford bought a large sum of land in Ramapough, New Jersey to build a factory for their car assembly. With all the production going on they had ton’s upon tons of waste. Since Ford owned a large area of land they found wooded areas to dump the waste they had created and they felt it was fine because they paid for the land. Even though Ford bought the land from a Native American tribe, some of those Indians still lived on the land.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    McCulloch v Maryland 4 Wheat. (17 U.S.) 316 (1819) Issue May Congress charter a bank even though it is not an expressly granted power?…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dred Scott v. Sanford came to trial in 1854. Let it be known that Dred Scott was the only case that reached the Supreme Court brought on by a slave against his master (Vandervelde 5). Scott presented the courts with the same arguments and three main questions were brought before the court: 1) As a black man, was Scott a citizen with a right to sue in federal courts? 2) Had prolonged residence (two years in each place) in a free state and territory made Scott free? 3) Was Fort Snelling actually free territory (McPherson)? The central issue had been how residence on free soil affected the legal status of a slave (Garraty 91). Sanford sought to have the Missouri decision upheld mainly on the basis of two arguments. First, they maintained that…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issue: Are union members protected in their role as officers under the Landrum-Griffin Act (LMRDA) of 1959?…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Keller v. Inland Metals All Weather Conditioning, Inc. Inland Metals did have an express warranty with the humidifier it sold to Keller. According to NOLO (2015) “an express warranty is a verbal or written statement that guarantees that a product is of a certain quality or will work in a certain way or for a certain amount of time.” In the case of Keller v. Inland Metal, Inland Metals provided both verbal and written statements about the quality of the humidifier they sold the Keller’s and that the humidifier would perform a certain way. Inland Metals met with the Kellers and sent the Kellers a letter discussing the humidifier and how it will handle their needs and reduce odors and humidity from their pool.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays