Bureaucracy and modern organization
Abstract: The theory of bureaucracy was proposed and published by Marx Weber (1947). Although there are some studies on this perspective were discussed before him, those theories did not form as systematic theory. After Weber, the issue of bureaucracy becomes a hot topic in the field of social organization. Almost all well-known scholars such as Martin and Henri have published their views on it. Bureaucracy adapted as the traditional organizational model during industrial society, essentially, bureaucracy could exist rational. This essay firstly will review the principle of bureaucracy in organization based on organizational design perspective. Secondly, it will analyze the strengths and weakness of bureaucracy made by Weber, focusing on Weber’s contribution for large contemporary organization design their structure and consider the attitude of those organizations toward bureaucracy: confirmed, rejected, adapted or added to. Finally it will consider the performance of bureaucracy organization in modern society with examples.
1. Introduction for Weber’s bureaucracy theory
2. Strengths of employing bureaucracy into organizational design
2 2.1 Division and selection of labor based on specialization
2 2.2 A vertical hierarchic management system
2.3 Clear norms and rules
3. Weakness of employing bureaucracy into organizational design
5 3.1 Staleness rules and working process
3.2 Overstaffing and corruption
3.3 Controlled centralized
3.4 Iron Cage of control
3.5 Hard to change
4. Evaluation of Weber’s bureaucracy theory
5. The success or failure of the affair is all to bureaucracy
7 5.1 Rapid development for success
5.2 Loss support of public feeling
1. Introduction for Weber’s bureaucracy theory
Max Weber, a famous German scholar and thinker. In his life work, pay close attention to the relationship between modern politics and human freedom. In this statement, Weber emphasizes rule, ability and knowledge, which provide an efficient and rational framework for the establishment of administrative system. He considers that ideal administrative organization should based on reasonable and legitimate rights. Along with the development of Weber’s ideas, individuals and non-rational factors reduced gradually, the same as the elimination of emotional factors (Wilson, 1989). Thus, Weber’s bureaucracy theory moving toward the direction of idealized and mature. Weber’s study was widely adapted by the organization in society because bureaucratic is essential process of human development. Weber’s bureaucracy theory not a new management system, only a summary of social practice, but made a great contribution in the course of historical development (Taylor, 1911). However, with the development of modern society, disadvantages of bureaucratic organization are increasingly exposed. Rational bureaucracy has some congenital structural deficiencies and over development, as consequently, there are some conflicts between post-industrial societies and bureaucracy theory, focusing on the unique factors of capitalist civilization and use ideal approach to take these factors into three core concepts: power, authority and validity . Weber believe that any organization must be structured based on some kind of rights. Without those rights, no organization can achieve their goals. According to Weber (1911), there are three types of legitimate authority: traditional authority, charismatic authority and rational (legal) authority. In the case of organizational design, it is necessary to deeply analysis all aspects of rational authority. Legally authority is built on the trust of regulations and rules of behavior. Rules as the basis of rule, an order have its authoritative effect only within the statutory requirements. As Weber call it rational-legal right, it is...
References: 1.Osborne, David and Gaebler, Ted. Reinventing Government : How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Plume. February, 1993. ISBN 0452269423
3. Baron de Grimm and Diderot, Correspondence littéraire, philosophique et critique, 1753-69, 1813 edition, Vol. 4, p. 146 & 508 - cited by Martin Albrow, Bureaucracy. London: Pall Mall Press, 1970, p. 16
7. Wilson, Woodrow. The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 2 (Jun., 1887), pp. 197-222
9. Lowi. 1979. The end of liberalism. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
10. Scholz and Wood. 1988. Controlling the IRS: Principals, principles, and public administration. American Journal of Political Science 42 (January): 141-162.
11. Huber and Shipan. 2002. Deliberate discretion: The institutional foundations of bureaucratic autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Ramseyer and Rosenbluth. 1993. Japan 's political marketplace. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
13. McCubbins and Schwartz. 1984. Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28: 16-79.
14. Chowdhury, Faizul Latif (2006). Corrupt Bureaucracy and Privatization of Tax Enforcement.
16. On Karl Marx: Hal Draper, Karl Marx 's Theory of Revolution, Volume 1: State and Bureaucracy. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1979.
17. Ernest Mandel, Power and Money: A Marxist Theory of Bureaucracy. London: Verso, 1992.
18. Neil Garston (ed.), Bureaucracy: Three Paradigms. Boston: Kluwer, 1993.
19. Chowdhury, Faizul Latif (2006), Corrupt Bureaucracy and Privatization of Tax Enforcement. Dhaka: Pathak Samabesh
21. Wilson, James Q. (1989). Bureaucracy.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document