Preview

Broken Spears

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
854 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Broken Spears
The author argues that the Spanish were completely at fault for the total destruction of the Aztec Empire. In Broken spears, the author explains how many factors other than Spanish power contributed to the downfall of the Aztecs. Not only did the Spanish have many advantages over the Aztecs, but also they also exploited them and took advantage of the cultural difference. The main key aspects to the Spanish victory, is that the Spanish were viewed as gods at first because of their appearance, the Aztecs welcomed the Spanish with gifts and festivities, which showed the Spanish had total control of people. The Aztecs also held a ritual ceremony for the arrival of the "god" that included a human sacrifice, which was seen by the Spanish as a disgusting act, this trigged Spanish hatred for the Aztecs. When the Spanish saw the resources that the Aztecs had, they quickly started taking advantage of the Aztecs weaknesses. The Spanish had more power; they were better equipped than the Aztecs and more advanced. The Aztecs' leader Montecuhzoma was a weak leader, he was more of a coward, more concerned with his well being and safety than the safety of his people and kingdom so he quickly surrendered under pressure. The Spanish used surrounding enemy tribes to take over the Aztec lands, then began to massacre men, women and children. When the Aztec became angry and started to fight back, they were quickly wrecked by the diseases the Spanish brought with them such as small pox and measles. The Spanish were immune to these diseases because they were well known in Europe and they had been exposed to them for years, but the Aztecs weren't so entire villages were wiped out in just few weeks which cleared the way for the Spanish to entirely conquer and destroy the Aztec empire.
Leon-Portilla based the stories told in this book upon old writings of actual Aztec people who survived the Spanish massacres. The actual authors of the stories told in this book are priests, wise men and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Burying the White Gods

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Burying the White Gods: New Perspectives on the Conquest of Mexico,” by Camilla Townsend, hits the points of why the Native Americans were submissive to the Spaniards. The thesis, in short, says that the Native Americans were not exactly conquered by the conquistadors. Instead, they thought the Cortes was a god, Quetzalcoatl. This in no way indicates the development, or lack thereof, in the Aztec society. The Aztecs invited the conquistadors into their society as gods; they were not conquered, per say, because of the Spain being unbearable.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nature’s force played a powerful and unforeseen role that decimated the Native’s population. The Spaniards brought deadly diseases such as smallpox and measles that the Natives have never encountered before. The Natives were not immune to these new diseases and that lead to the deaths of thousands of Indians, closing the gap between the number of men under Cortes’ control and the Indians. The surviving warriors were unable to fight at their full potential due to the sickness. The Spaniards, who were immune to these diseases, were able to at their full strength. Without this natural factor, the chances of the Mexicans beating Cortes with sheer number increases.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    _The Broken Spears: The Aztec Account of the Conquest of _Mexico, edited and with an introduction by Miguel Leon-Portillo (Boston: Beacon Press, 1992), pp. 196 Reviewed by: Nicholas Adams Broken Spears is an accumulated, chronological collection of texts and accounts of the invasion of the Aztec empire by the Spanish from April 22, 1519 to August 13, 1521. This time period from arrival to the surrender of the Aztec empire to the Spanish is filled with interactions between two different people and the events that encompass what it takes to conquer an indigenous people with complete disregard. Broken Spears also allows the history of the conquest of the Aztec empire to be seen from the Aztec point of view, as priests and natives who survived…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anderson also shared his views of Miguel Leon-Portilla’s book The Broken Spears. According to Arthur J.O. Anderson even though Miguel Leon-Portilla’s book is mostly of the defeat, the chaos, and grief the Aztecs endured, it is also a story that wanted to remind Spain of their debt they owe to the Aztecs . In my opinion, I also felt that this story was written to make the Spanish aware of their dark history and chaos they brought to ancient Mesoamerica. The book is written in the Aztec perspective and it depicts the Spanish as greedy, careless men who tried to annihilate any trace of Mesoamerican culture and tried to enforce their own way of life. So I do agree with Anderson and feel that the Spanish do owe a huge debt to the natives of Mesoamerican. Anderson also discussed how many natives after the conquest of Mexico were taught by Spanish Francian friars to read and write Spanish and Latin as well as to put their native language into Latin. Unos annles de la nacion Mexicana written in 1528 put native accounts written in Nahuatl with Spanish translation from the Franciscan fathers into one source. The Broken Spears included writings which traced back to the first transliterations such as Unos annles de la nacion Mexicana or The Codex Florentino and many other accounts. Anderson deeply appreciated the energy, artistry and poetry that went in Miguel Leon-Portilla’s book. He felt that Leon-Portilla selected a decent background of the Aztec culture and used effective sources that told the descriptions of the natives very well. He felt that the reader would find Leon-Portilla’s work to be interesting, accurate, and useful to…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Abstract: This essay addresses the question ‘To what extent did Spanish military superiority facilitate the success of Cortes’ conquest of the Aztec Empire between 1519-21?’. In order to reach a conclusion, a range of primary and secondary sources have been consulted, including The Conquest of Mexico by Hugh Thomas, The Conquistadors documentary by Michael Wood and letters from Hernan Cortes and Bernal Diaz to King Charles V of Spain. In 1521, a relatively small number of Spanish adventurers managed to conquer the vast Aztec empire and destroy a civilisation. Their story has been popularised in Western culture and become somewhat of a legend; however, the role that the Spanish themselves played in their eventual success is often exaggerated. Traditionally, explanations for the success of the Spanish have focused on their military and strategic superiority and the notorious leadership of…

    • 5907 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Disease also played a huge part in the defeat of the Aztecs. The Spanish brought ailments that the Aztecs had no immunities for. Three-fourths died from either violence or diseases such as small-pox and the measles in just the first century of the conquests. The Aztecs’ tactics of war were quite different from those of the Spaniards, and this was also a point in the Spaniards’ favor. The Spaniards fought…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Spaniards allied with the Tlaxcalan indians and marched into Tenochtitlan. Montezuma welcomed in Quetzalcoatl’s men with open arms, but Hernan Cortes seized power of the empire by using Montezuma as a figurehead against his will, while Cortes made all the real decisions. Cortes acted as a secret leader until 1520, when events caused tension to escalate, and Cortes demanded Montezuma command his people obey the Spaniards. The Indians didn’t like this at all, and showered their leader in stones, he then went on to die days later in June of 1520. The spanish originally went to Mexico to search for land and gold, or other plunders because they had no prosperity back home in Spain. When they reached Mexico, they discovered the Aztec people and the native indians of the land, and decided to try to eliminate them and their ways (cannibalism, human sacrifices, etc. didn’t appeal to the Spanish, and they didn’t want people like that inhabiting the same land as…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Broken Spears Quotes

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Montezuma, who was the ruler of the Aztecs, had a funny feeling about them. Not too long after they arrived, the Aztecs realized that the Spanish could be killed just like their other enemies, so they went to war. They caught some of the Spanish, killed some of them, even ate some. The Spanish won out because of their preparation, and because they brought so many diseases with them, it killed some of the Aztecs as well. The Spanish came to the Aztecs land, and the Aztecs thought that this was the 'God' that they had been waiting for. They treated the Spanish with riches and lavish food, as they would a God. They only treated them to the finest of treasures because they were sure this was what they were looking for. The Spanish reported that they 'were sickened by the people's shocking routines', which was mentioning toward the sacrifice they saw. Then, when the Spanish tried to take advantage of what the Aztecs had given them, they realized they weren’t the Gods they thought they were looking for. So they cut them off. Conversely, the Spaniards had the horses, firearms, and they had most of the people of the Aztec society on their side. With that being said, the Spaniards didn’t like how the Aztec land was being run. With these people and the Spanish's knowledge expansions, they overthrew the Aztec Empire. After the Aztecs were conquered by the Spaniards, they were turned into…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some critics might argue that the Aztec Empire had an extensive amount of people in comparison to the few Spaniards, that the Aztecs could have developed a systematic plan to avoid Spanish conquest if they did not welcome or misbelieved the Spanish were retuning gods reclaiming their rightful empire. However, the Aztecs were still going to encounter the Spanish, as they were already settled in areas in New Hispaniola in the Gulf of Mexico. The Spanish sought to increase their chances of wealth and fortune and would try to find those riches. Also, the forced tributary system and capture of slaves as sacrifice created resentment and hatred toward the Aztec empire, which was a strategic advantage for the Spanish as they could form enemy allies…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the year 1531, early in the month of December a miracle happened in Tepeyacac, it was said that the miracle illustrious Virgin, Blessed Mary, Mother of God, Our Lady, appeared to a man named Juan Diego. He was a humble Indian who lived in Quahutítlan but was from Tlatilolco. The way the author narrates the beginning of the story is really good. He uses a really sincere tone that makes the story look real and really respectful attitude.…

    • 2390 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why Did Montezuma Fall

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First, killing thousands of people, the loss of people in a loss that can't be calculated (war). Although the Aztecs certainly weren't the first people ever to sacrifice humans, the fact that they did and the incredible number they sacrificed led to the hatred of some of the surrounding peoples. The powerful city-state of Tlaxcala was one of these. Many of their own had been sacrificed, and in the end they joined the Spaniards to fight the Aztecs. It may be that the Spanish simply was an excuse to start what was already an inevitable civil…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Spanish, led by Hernán Cortés landed on the Mexican peninsula in search of gold in 1519. Within three years, the Spanish had conquered the Aztec Empire. Accounts of what happened during the first Spanish attack differ greatly based on whose account the event is read. According to the primary source by the Aztecs, the Aztecs were brutally slaughtered by the Spanish. When the Spanish first arrived the Aztecs called them lords because they believed that their leader was Quetzalcoatl, the bird god.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History Aztec Final

    • 2748 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The question of how a small Spanish army was able to conquer one of the greatest ancient empires in history is one that has been raised countless times. Often there are no simple answers and frequently super natural omens and religious understandings are presented as the reason. The Spanish were also quick to present the answer that they were simply more intelligent, technically and morally and that they had a superior morale. Historians such as Prescott present the answer that Europeans will always triumph because they have superior mental and moral qualities.1 However historians like Clenninden, Fernandez-Armesto, Townsend and Toderov have argued against these explanations, considering them ‘Conquistador myth’. 2 This essay will discuss the traditional arguments and consider the flaws they present, aiming to challenge the idea of the ‘Conquistador myth’. The aim is in line with arguments by Toderov and Clenninden to prove that the Europeans did not manage to conquer the Aztec empire because of their natural superiority but rather a range of factors that included using different cultural understandings to their advantage, including their weapons, their native allies and the delayed initial reaction of the Aztecs.…

    • 2748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cabeza De Vaca Analysis

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cabeza de Vaca, on the other hand, asserts this “retelling” or opinion that he gives on the natives that he encountered as his duty to relay, so that others who seek to join his cause in expedition can learn or even draw their own conclusions. This difference in “perception”, so to speak, is what makes up the core difference in values that both of these writers display and what effect it has on their works. Sahagun’s research style of using a survey-type system to “interview” all roles of society in Aztec life shows his priorities are skewed towards primary sources instead of personal opinion. Sahagun also allows the reader to draw their own conclusions on what responses should be valued highly compared to other responses from different sects of society. To contrast the writing styles of Sahagun and Cabeza de Vaca, we can clearly see that while Cabeza de Vaca morphs his encounters into a “story” that is much more oriented towards specific reader (the king), Sahagun presents facts in a clear manner that not only includes input from the Natives themselves, but allows the reader to make their own conclusions on the subject.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Defeating the Aztec Empire

    • 2644 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Hernan Cortes, a fierce Spanish conquistador, landed at San Juan de Ulua, in April 1519. With him, Cortes had 508 soldiers, one hundred sailors, artillery cannons, eleven ships and sixteen horses. Cortes and his small army, marched through Mexico, forming alliances with Aztec rivals, until reaching the Aztec capital of Tenochtitlan. Tenochtitlan was the capital city of the massive Mexican empire known as the Aztecs or Mexica. It had a population of 200,000 people; almost three times that of the largest city of Spain, Seyville (Windschuttle, 43). Within the next two years, Cortes and his men had triumphantly defeated the Aztecs and taken control of Tenochtitlan against all odds. (Daniel, 1992) So how, despite be hopelessly outnumbered, without the possibility of new supplies or reinforcements, fighting other native tribes and Spaniards, and the Aztecs on their own turf, did this tiny Spanish force defeat such a formidable army. Today, there are a number of reasons why the Spanish have believed to been able to overcome such odds. A combination of poor Aztec military tactics against advance Spanish weaponry and strategy, a weak Aztec ruler, the spread of disease, Tenochtitlan’s poor governing over its populace, and the interconnectedness of Aztec military and religion ultimately led to the demise of its empire.…

    • 2644 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays