Reference
1) "Bill of Rights of the United States of America (1791)." Bill of Rights Institute. N.p., n.d. Web. 1 Oct 2013. http://billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/bill-of-rights/.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Q. Where can I obtain the 1-Handed Wands that allow me to use a shield?…
- 332 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The second amendment under the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution has protected the right of the people to keep and bear arms since 1791 (Head). It protects an individual’s right…
- 1167 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The preamble states that the purpose of the Constitution is to create "a more perfect union" and help make the United Sates of America a place of freedom. The Bill of Rights presents the fundamental freedoms of human rights. It lays out what people are entitled to and what the government cannot take away. Both of these documents provide evidence that the United States' government should be fair and reasonable, and lays out what is needed for the country to be successful.…
- 303 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” This amendment has caused many debates throughout the years due to the different ways in which it could be interpreted. Most federal appeals courts have said that, when read as a whole, this amendment protects only the rights of the militia to bear arms. However, on a decision made on March 8, 2007, the majority focused on the second clause, saying that the amendment protects the rights of individual people to own firearms as well. The decision was made in a federal appeals court in Washington to strike down a gun control law in the District of Columbia that made it impossible for residents to keep handguns in their homes. The court ruled that banning the right to own firearms was a violation of the Second Amendment.…
- 560 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Second Amendment has been one of the most controversial topics that America faces today. The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (LII). Under the constitution, you are able to own guns but there has been many restrictions and Acts that control your rights to a minimum. Gun rights reforms are how the Acts and certain limitations are made. These reforms are made to help lower the dangers of these weapons and allow for higher protection. The Second Amendment and Gun Rights should be adapted to today’s society along with certain past events to allow citizens to bear arms publicly. In multiple scenarios, these past event may have been avoided if gun control was open to more eligible citizens.…
- 881 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
During the mid 20th century, citizens all over America were fighting for their rights including women and those of color especially. This period marked the beginning of a long road of reconciliation and reconstruction that citizens have finally been able to cross the finish line in establishing equal rights for all of the United States citizens. Over time, American’s former issues regarding the civil liberties of citizens have been slowly resolved such as the rights of equality for citizens of color, the repercussions of citizens voicing their opinions, and acquiring rights for women. Under the 14th amendment, slaves were granted citizenship in the united states and were promised equal treatment under the law but after over a century of…
- 1475 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The rights that are presented to the American citizens are created to protect and defend individual rights, while some rights are non-negotiable, there are many that are not absolute, for safety purposes. In order to protect citizens and ensure of their safety, certain changes must be made to ensure safety to the American citizens. The Constitution was created to protect and limit certain ideas and rights created by and given to Americans to ensure that the communities and colonies could grow and make progress in the expansion of the country.…
- 317 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There are now limitations of free speech that were not put in place before because they have evolved as a problem of our society in this day and age. These limitations that "Fall outside of its protection are obscenity, child pornography, defamation, incitement to violence and true threats of violence," (Richards) "Even in those categories, there are tests that have to be met in order for the speech to be illegal. Beyond that, we are free to speak" (Richards). The Supreme Court of the United States of America fully supports and condones the First Amendment in all aspects and cases that don’t fall under any of these categories. This law is held to the highest importance because our country is run off of the human rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and without freedom to have a voice this would not exist. The limitations are set in place, but when the Founding Fathers passed this Amendment they wanted absolute freedom of speech, as they felt there should be no limits on what can be said and not said. Everyone has a voice or at least that’s how it started off. Present day issues, such as the items listed above, shouldn’t create a limitation on what can and cannot be said. That’s why we live in a free country unlike any in the world.…
- 1792 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
The Second Amendment states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Proponents of more gun control interpret it as being meant for the militia and that the gun laws should be stricter for the average American citizen or ban guns altogether. However, opponents of more gun control believe that the amendment is protecting an individual’s rights right to own guns and protect themselves. However, gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime. Guns will still exist even if it’s not legal for civilians to own them because there is always a way for criminals to get a hold of them, it has been proven in history, and don’t prevent gun related deaths.…
- 712 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Second Amendment states, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" (US Const., amend. 2). The amendment was adopted for a number of reasons, ranging from wanting to give U.S. residents the right to protect themselves in case the government waged war against the people, and the right to provide for their families by hunting with firearms, to ensuring their right to defend their homes against invaders. Basically, the second amendment was mainly put in place for our protection. The 2008 Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, upheld that right (No. 7-290. Supreme Ct. of the US. 26 June 2008). The Court 's ruling led to the lifting of a ban on handguns that had existed for 32 years. In an interview with the Washington Post, Lawyer Alan Gura noted that there had been "all sorts of predictions that there would be blood on the streets and carnage and all…
- 1709 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The second amendment states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This amendment is one of the best rules that our forefathers gave us when they wrote the constitution. It allows the people to have some sort of defense if the government decides to rise against it’s own people. However the weapons that middle class people can own are nothing but amazing. The second amendment is good; however, it needs some restrictions on what ordinary people can buy and use in their homes.…
- 702 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The “discussions about citizens’ rights to bear arms extend back to ancient times. Political theorists from Cicero of ancient Rome to John Locke (1632–1704) of England and Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712–1778) of France viewed the possession of arms as a symbol of personal freedom and an indispensable element of popular government” (“Gun Control”). As you can see, the concept of personal protection is by no means a new one. Due to America’s bitter fight for freedom from Great Britain’s tyrannical empire, the founding fathers firmly believed it was within the citizen’s unalienable rights to bear arms. Not only was this idea reinforced by the need to protect oneself from would be attackers, but also the government itself if ever need be. In order to solidify this right to the people the second amendment was ratified as a hard copy defense for American citizens to legally bear arms. As it clearly states in the bill of rights, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” ("The Constitution of the United States," Amendment…
- 1270 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The Second Amendment in the United States Constitution gives people the right to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment has been interpreted in many ways, and its limitations and what it controls have been questioned. The question that arises over and over again is that will stricter gun laws make the United States safer or more perilous. The answer is clear. With lack of gun control and that black market guns are at almost every street corner whether you think it or not. Guns are a very dangerous weapons, and the United States has to create stricter laws in order to operate and obtain them in order to protect the public.…
- 487 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The second amendment of the Constitution says, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Analysis of this clause varies depending on how one wants to interpret. For example, someone who views the amendment with the original intent of the framers’ might view the amendment as the states being able to rise up against the possibility of tyranny. If the president dispersed Congress and take away the State’s voice and choice to pass their own laws, that would be tyranny, and a state militia would be able to rise up against it with the weapons they were allowed to have. To a person who wants to read it as the amendment is written, the right to own guns should not be infringed because citizens need a well-regulated militia to protect our liberties. The difference is that the protection against tyranny is not implied in this belief. Critics believe that the Constitution should be read and interpreted as Americans now. To which, a well regulated militia is not what citizens have. Even though citizens can have certain high powered and high magazine…
- 1587 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
The Billl of Rights are stated in the first ten amendments. This bill contains the rights of; freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of petition, right to be protected from unreasonable searches and seizures, right to bear arms, right to not give housing to soldiers during peace time, freedom of the press, freedom to equal justice, and the right to freedom and security.…
- 340 Words
- 10 Pages
Satisfactory Essays