Preview

Bill Miller Value Trust

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1365 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bill Miller Value Trust
1. This case goes back to the year the 2005. Value Trust was an $11.2 billion mutual fund in the middle of that year and had outperformed for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index for 14 consecutive years. The fund was managed by William H. Miller III. During those 14 years, the fund experienced an average annual return of 14.6%. This return outperformed the S & P 500 by 3.67% per year. Morningstar claimed the Value Trust mutual fund fell behind the S & P 500 in 32 12-month periods out of 152 12-month periods during the 14 year time span of consistently outperforming its benchmark index.
Investment performance can be measured in many different ways. Tracking the investment’s return is a simple way of measuring investment performance. No investments are the same; therefore, each investment’s objectives may be trying to achieve different goals. Some investments are aimed to establish long-term growth, while others try to achieve short-term current income, and some are a combination of the two. When considering measuring mutual fund, or any portfolio, performance, it is important to understand the Annual Total Return of the investment. This is computed as the increase or decrease in net asset value plus the fund’s income distributions given as a percentage of the fund’s NAV at the beginning of the investment period. Once the annual total return is established, this can be compared to a benchmark index. There are different benchmarks to use for different investments. Commonly used benchmarks for measuring US stock returns are the Wilshire 5000 Index for the broad market, the S&P 500 Composite Index for large capitalization stocks, and the Russell 2000 Index for small stocks. In the Value Trust mutual fund case, the most commonly used approaches for measuring performance was the percentage of the annual growth rate of the NAV assuming reinvestment (total return on investment) and the absolute dollar value today of an investment made at some

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Vanguard 500 Index Investment Fund (VFINX) is a large-blend mutual fund that uses an indexing investment approach designed to track the performance of the S&P 500’s index. The fund employs a passive management investment approach. It is a low cost way to gain diversified exposure to the equity market in the United States. The fund invests in 500 of the largest companies in the United States. The companies span many different industries and the fund accounts for about 75% of the United States stock market’s value. VFINX measures the investment return of large-capitalization stocks. The most obvious risk is the volatility that comes with its full exposure to the stock market. The mutual fund portfolio’s composition is made up of 99.45% stocks and .55% cash. The expense ratio for this mutual fund is .17%. This is the annual fee that shareholders are charged. It expresses the percentage of assets deducted each fiscal year for fund expenses, including 12b-1 fees, management fees, administrative fees, operating costs, and all other asset-based costs incurred by the fund. For the Year-to-Date (ytd) rankings in its category, VFINX ranked in at 24 according to Yahoo! Finance. Over the last 10 years, the fund has performed in direct correlation to the S&P 500 being that it is an index fund and there is a beta of 1, meaning that whatever the S&P 500 does, the fund will do as well. VFINX is a good choice if an investor is seeking a mutual fund that offers the stability of large, established companies and the wide exposure of a fund that holds both value and growth stocks.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milkmaid Analysis

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Investors need to learn the art of managing their funds in such a manner as to maximize returns while minimizing risks. This is easier said than done. It is a complete science with its own set of rules and regulations. Mutual fund investments tend to help investors in this regard. By clearly defining the industry or the focus of the mutual fund,…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nike Wacc Case Study

    • 2268 Words
    • 10 Pages

     Mutual fund management firm  Emphasis on large-cap value stocks  Has been outperforming the market for the past 18 months  Kimi Ford – portfolio manager seeking to identify undervalued stocks, consistent with the fund’s investment strategy…

    • 2268 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill Miller

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Value Trust is a mutual fund that has performed well against various indexes in the years leading up to 2005. Value Trust takes S&P 500 as its benchmark index, which it has outperformed for the last 14 years. Prior to 2005, Value Trust had an average annual total return of 14.6%, which was 3.67% higher than S&P 500’s average annual returns. From exhibits 1 and 5 we can see that the return was much higher for Value Trust (15.04%) compared to the S&P 500 (9.48%) over a ten year period. The NAV was consistently increasing from 1994 to 2000 up until the market crash when the NAV decreased but then again increased consistently until 2004. The NAV is an investment measure and increase indicates a better performance. Also from exhibit 1 we can see that the annual return of Value Trust was higher than the S&P 500’s over the years. According to the case Value Trust uses S&P 500 however we should make some analysis on what kind of shares S&P 500 deals with versus what kind of shares Value Trust deals with. S&P comprises of 500 widely held common stocks in other words large cap stocks. On the other hand 50% of Value Trust’s assets were of only 10 large cap companies and Value Trust was open for investing in growth companies. This made the beta of Value Trust (1.31 as taken from Exhibit 1) higher than S&P’s beta indicating that Value Trust is riskier. In this case to make the benchmark more comparable to Value Trust we chose to use other benchmarks, such as the S&P 400 mid-cap. Although this benchmark may give the impression that Value Trust did not perform as well as it should have against its peers (Value Trust’s 10-year annualized return is 15.95%, compared to the S&P mid-caps’ 14.13%), the fact that the fund still outpaced this smaller S&P fund is remarkable.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1999, the fund’s annual total return was 26.71% with a style of large cap growth, the relative performance to that index was 38.92%, which he did not beat. Similarly in 2000, Value Trust realized a total return of -7.14% with a style of large cap value, while the performance of that index was 9.7%. A good performance of a fund is one that provides attractive reward-to-volatility trade-off and to…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immediate (albeit small) cash component, while allowing Miller to continue to participate in TN upside…

    • 4653 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Zeus Asset Management Inc

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages

    As the current fund performance measurement consist mainly of holding period and benchmark return, these return have weaknesses that does not allow it to be a sufficient measurement. As a HPR generally calculated based on determining what the total return is earned from holding the investment for a specific period of time. The advantage of it is that it is easy to calculate and understand by investors, at the same time taking into account of the income and growth. However it did not take into account of time value of money, that make the return inaccurate for a longer time period. Other than that, the holding period return is based on historical value thus generally not the best measure as it is not a forward looking method. Other than that, a benchmark return would be a good measure in term that Zeus could compare against a certain index however it is not easy to find an index…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Measures above then compared with the benchmark portfolio such a s Russell 2000 Index, S&P500, Dow Jones, and Value Line. But there are some critics of those two measurements because they neglect the relative risk of the mutual fund. Different types of security yielded different returns and risks.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr.Devesh

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages

     By middle 2005, Leg Mason Value Trust managed by Bill had outperformed S&P 500 index for 14 years in a row. This was longest successful run by any fund manager.  The average return on the fund was 14.6% which surpassed the S&P by 3.67% per year.  The value trust only had 36 holdings, 10 of which accounted for 50% of the fund’s assets.  No manager had matched Miller’s consistent index beating record.  Miller’s results were in contradiction to the conventional theory which suggests that it is extremely difficult to beat the market on a sustained basis as it is characterized by high competition, easy entry and informational efficiency.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thompson Asset Management

    • 2102 Words
    • 14 Pages

    returns that an investor can use in order to manage its portfolio. Some focus of the…

    • 2102 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bill Miller Value Trust

    • 2718 Words
    • 11 Pages

    As manager of the Legg Mason Value Trust, Miller enjoyed the distinction of being the only fund manager who beat the S&P 500 Index for the 14 consecutive years from 1991 through 2005. As such, Value Trust has performed extraordinarily well. In fact, Miller’s fund made money every year from 1991 through 2005, but he was the anomaly. “As mutual funds became…

    • 2718 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Warren Buffett rejects them as the financial statement may not fully represent the economic reality of the business and the book value only reflects the historical data which already happened in the past…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ding, Bill, and Russ Wermers, 2011, Mutual fund “stars”: The performance and behavior of U.S. fund managers, Working paper, University of Maryland.…

    • 8507 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miss

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to measure the performance of individual funds, the benchmark should be chosen to critical whether the portfolio has met or not the investor’s goal and objectives. Refer to the substance of the five funds; the benchmarks are selected shown as below and reasons why choose these benchmarks are shown following:…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    equity trust seminar

    • 7282 Words
    • 23 Pages

    2 Why did the conflict between common law and equity arise and how was it resolved?…

    • 7282 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics