Preview

Bartleby and Civil Disobedienc

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
568 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bartleby and Civil Disobedienc
The extremely simplified definition of civil disobedience given by Webster's Dictionary is "nonviolent opposition to a law through refusal to comply with it, on grounds of conscience." Thoreau in "Civil Disobedience" and Martin Luther King in "Letter from Birmingham Jail" both argue that laws thought of as unjust in one's mind should not be adhered to. In Herman Melville's "Bartleby," a man named Bartleby is thought of by many to be practicing civil disobedience. His actions are nonviolent, and he refuses to comply with anything his boss says. But his behavior has nothing to do with morals. Bartleby is merely a lonely guy who does not wish to work and has nothing to do with civil disobedience. Thoreau says that if injustice "is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then I say break the law" (Jacobus 134). He is personally giving permission for an individual to ignore anything he or she finds morally unacceptable. However, in "Bartleby," Bartleby's boss places no unjust laws and assigns no unjust work. He simply asks Bartleby to do easy tasks such as, "when those papers are all copied, I will compare them with you", or, "just step around the Post Office, won't you? And see if there is anything for me" (Melville 116). The boss, who is also the narrator, never requests Bartleby to perform any difficult chores. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s interpretation of an unjust law is, "a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself" (Jacobus 159). The injustice described here by King also does not match the characterization of Bartleby's boss. Bartleby needs no civil disobedience since nothing could be considered unjust in the boss's management. Even if an unjust act were placed against Bartleby, he would not have had any cares about the injustice. He was a man who needed a place to live and chose to be a law-copyist. He has no desire to do any work

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The essay Civil Disobedience, written by Henry David Thoreau has much to do with Thoreau’s own experiences than a general perception of people as a whole. Thoreau, a stellar student from Harvard believed one key idea: change begins with the individual. With this belief Thoreau in 1846 spoke out against the Mexican American War and slavery. His response resulted in the deliberate obliviousness to his taxes. In July of 1846 Thoreau was arrested for not paying his taxes and spent a night in Jail. During this time Thoreau wrote about the laws enforced by the government must be based on conscience rather than majority appeal.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Disobedience is the refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest. The action of Civil Disobedience is usually, not always though, classified as being not violent resistance. Also, it may be compared as compassion of respectable disagreement.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Civil Disobedience” by Henry Thoreau warns its readers that we are at the mercy of our government and have no power as a minority that conforms to the majority, which represses our desire to resist the wrongs we believe in without the support of the masses. The place for an honorable, just man is within prison, which he explains through his personal experience. In part 1, Thoreau exposes how the government is without a conscience, susceptible to corruption for their own advantage, and are served not by men but by “machines” (5). We are left “to the mercy of chance” under the power of the majority. Part 2 explains that Thoreau didn’t believe in the voting system so would not pay poll tax, and was sent to jail only to find that he felt more…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As far back as one looks, society has wrestled with the concept of a Law being unjust or just. Numerous influential people from history such as Plato, Thoreau, and King all have different views on what determines a law to be just, or unjust. Plato describes this as, if one was to see a law an unjust and goes again that law or breaks it then they shall face any consequences given. On the other hand, Thoreau sees as though every individual has the right to determine if a law is Just or unjust. Leaving the individual, the right to resist. While King takes this idea and states, that each person does have the right to resist, but no change can be made by a single person. Instead it takes a mass movement and multiple people collectively coming together…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau’s essay “Civil Disobedience,” was one of King’s focus points which led him to believe in disobeying unjust laws. King felt unjust laws could be described as ones that were…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thoreau states in the text that this exact lack of scrupulous intentions would affect the decision-making and state of mind of any individual citizen. "If... the machine of government... is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law." "It is not a man's duty, as a matter of course, to devote himself to the eradication of any, even the most enormous wrong; he may still properly have other concerns to engage him; but it is his duty, at least, to wash his hands of it, and, if he gives it no thought longer, not to give it practically his support." (On Duty of Civil Disobedience.) Thoreau explains that every citizen has the obligation to oppose all unjust occurrences and has his or her own individual responsibility within their own…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” (Henry Thoreau) This famous quote is taken from the famous essay Civil Disobedience written in 1848, Civil Disobedience still stands as an expression of moral and individual conscience against a un just government. To begin, the quote written by Henry Thoreau, “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” is essentially saying If following the law results in a wrong done to another person, then do not follow the law, and that morals from human to human come before government rules or laws resulting in disobedience.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that Thoreau makes some good points about civil disobedience in his writing. And I think that if more countries would go by these points, then a lot of the world’s most major and disturbing problems would be solved. Here are his main points:…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Case Against Civil Disobedience the unknown author claims in his very first sentence that “the most striking characteristic of civil disobedience is its irrelevance to the problems of today” and that it is “the resort… exercised because the subject cannot or will not take up the rights and duties of the citizen.” What he fails to realize is that the rights and duties of a citizen is to keep an eye on the laws that rule the land and to revolt when those laws become unjust. It’s all part and parcel to the social contract thought up by Locke and heavily leaned upon by Thomas Jefferson. As Henry David Thoreau says in Civil Disobedience, “a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscious.” Civil disobedience can never become irrelevant because corruption will forever attempt to corrode even the best intentions of a government and so there will always be a need to revolt when unjust laws get pasted.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without civil disobedience it’s impossible to see where we would be today. The first act of civil disobedience was the Boston Tea Party. On December, 16, 1773 the group Sons of Liberty created a political demonstration against the Tea Act. The Tea Act was an unfair tax used to make us pay for their war. This is one of many times we were treated differently and unfairly than citizens living in Britain. The act of throwing tea into the harbor ignited tension for more people to protest and overthrow the…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Henry Thoreau, through his writings, influenced the Martin Luther King, Jr. in his quest for equal rights. Not only is this evidenced in King’s actions, but King partially attributes his methods to the inspiration of Thoreau. In “Civil Disobedience,” Thoreau promotes resisting unjust government actions. Although not opposed to violent solutions, Thoreau encourages less aggressive measures. Specifically, Thoreau gave the example of refusing to pay certain taxes. Following this idea, King writes in detail about nonviolent resistance in his first book, Stride Toward Freedom. King describes how one of Thoreau’s works was his original inspiration for his peaceful approach explaining, “. . . I read Thoreau’s Essay on Civil Disobedience for…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” inspired a revolution of men to do what is right. His term: civil disobedience, refers to people protesting unjust laws by refusing to comply with them. This process is not just for any laws and practices but ones that cannot be resolved by the Democratic process. In his time, Thoreau referred to slavery and the Mexican-American War. Thoreau found both of these pieces of history to be hypocritical of the United States moral values. The United States stands for the home of the free when, in fact, they enslaved people. He refused to be a part of the government and He showed his civil disobedience by not paying taxes. He was put in jail for this, saying: “Under a government which imprisons any unjustly,…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of both Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience” and Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is to talk about the injustice law in the society. Thoreau explains how the government is run by the majority “because they are physically the strongest” (941). Thoreau believes a society “in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice” (941). Thoreau suggests to the audience that it is necessary to “resist” the injustice “for the most part” (942). Similarly, King states that “one has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws,” and that “conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (265). Through non-violence protest, both Thoreau and King are encouraging their audience to take the duty of civil…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Slavery Argument Analysis

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henry David Thoreau addresses the government on forcing individuals to be inequitable and suggests that they should break the law to do the right…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this essay, Rawls presents a justification for civil disobedience by what he describes to be a Social Contract Doctrine where a citizenry is required to abide by laws that are made to benefit the populous as a whole while unjust laws; passed constitutionally; could be criticized in the constitutional democracy through civil disobedience. These acts will allow the majority to see what’s wrong in their actions and should only be allowed when one is subject to injustice over an extended period of time, where injustice is in clear violation of liberties and equal citizenship, and when it would be socially acceptable to protest other things of similar caliber. Rawls provides a useful explanation for why and when we should exercise Civil Disobedience,…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays