Preview

Automated Essay Scoring with E-Rater V.2.0

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8166 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Automated Essay Scoring with E-Rater V.2.0
Research Report

Automated Essay Scoring With E-rater® v.2.0

Yigal Attali Jill Burstein

Research & Development

November 2005 RR-04-45

Automated Essay Scoring With E-rater® v.2.0

Yigal Attali and Jill Burstein ETS, Princeton, NJ

November 2005

As part of its educational and social mission and in fulfilling the organization 's nonprofit charter and bylaws, ETS has and continues to learn from and also to lead research that furthers educational and measurement research to advance quality and equity in education and assessment for all users of the organization 's products and services. ETS Research Reports provide preliminary and limited dissemination of ETS research prior to publication. To obtain a PDF or a print copy of a report, please visit: http://www.ets.org/research/contact.html

Copyright © 2005 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE, E-RATER ETS, the ETS logo, and TOEFL are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service. TEST OF ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE is a trademark of Educational Testing Service. CRITERION is a service mark of Educational Testing Service. GMAT and the GRADUATE MANAGEMENT ADMISSION Test are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council.

Automated Essay Scoring With E-rater® v.2.0

Yigal Attali and Jill Burstein ETS, Princeton, NJ

Abstract E-rater® has been used by ETS for automated essay scoring since 1999. This paper describes a new version of e-rater (v.2.0) that differs from the previous one (v.1.3) with regard to the feature set and model building approach. The paper describes the new version, compares the new and previous versions in terms of performance, and presents evidence on the validity and reliability of scores produced by the new version. Key words: Automated essay scoring, e-rater, CriterionSM

i

E-rater® has been used by ETS for automated essay scoring since February 1999. Burstein, Chodorow, and Leacock (2003)



References: Breland, H. M., & Gaynor, J. L. (1979). A comparison of direct and indirect assessments of writing skill. Journal of Educational Measurement, 16, 119-128. Breland, H. M., Jones, R. J., & Jenkins, L. (1994). The College Board vocabulary study (College Board Rep. No. 94-4; ETS RR-94-26). New York: College Entrance Examination Board. Burstein, J., Chodorow, M., & Leacock, C. (2003, August). CriterionSM: Online essay evaluation: An application for automated evaluation of student essays. In J. Riedl & R. Hill (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco, Mexico (pp. 3-10). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press. Burstein, J., Marcu, D., & Knight, K. (2003). Finding the WRITE stuff: Automatic identification of discourse structure in student essays. IEEE Intelligent Systems: Special Issue on Natural Language Processing, 18(1): 32-39. Haberman, S. (2004). Statistical and measurement properties of features used in essay assessment (ETS RR-04-21). Princeton, NJ: ETS. Salton, G., Wong, A., & Yang, C.S. (1975). A vector space model for automatic indexing. Communications of the ACM, 18, 613-620. Swets, J. A. (1996). Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics: collected papers. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 21

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    " Ratemyprofessor.com" is a website well known to college students and high school students for giving insight into what students' Professors will be like. The Article " Does ratemyprofessor.com really rate my professor?" discusses the websites usefulness as well as its accuracy based off of the topics used to judge the professor. The article, first seen in "Assessment and evaluation in higher education" comments on topics such as the websites use of the catagories "clarity" and "helpfulness". It also has commentary on the "looks" and "easiness" catagorys and determines that this is a flaw in the websites ability to accurately judge a professor. The authors James Otto, Douglous A. Sanford, Jr. , and Dougless N. Ross procede to explain…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Welcome to WritePoint, the automated review system that recognizes errors most commonly made by university students in academic essays. The system embeds comments into your paper and suggests possible changes in grammar and style. Please evaluate each comment carefully to ensure that the suggested change is appropriate for your paper, but remember that your instructor's preferences for style and format prevail. You will also need to review your own citations and references since WritePoint capability in this area is limited. Thank you for using WritePoint.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Compare essay responses 2A (which scored an 8), 2B (which scored a 6), and 2C (which scored a 2). Consider the scoring commentary and rubric provided for you. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each essay?…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This standard is demonstrated in students’ final drafts of their papers. Part of the grading criteria is whether or not the students used proper spelling and punctuation in their assignment.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    05 Ela9 Eosw Narrative 2012

    • 19697 Words
    • 84 Pages

    student writing relative to the standards embedded in the scoring criteria in the scoring guides.…

    • 19697 Words
    • 84 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comp 1 Week 3

    • 261 Words
    • 1 Page

    You will get two attempts to work on this assessment. The instructor will provide you an interim grade on the first draft submission. You will receive your final grade when you resubmit the revised draft. The grade for the first submission will stand if you do not submit the revised draft to your instructor for final grading. Submit your essay in a Microsoft Word document of the following specifications:…

    • 261 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Your writing will be evaluated for its overall quality, including how well your essay addresses the topic and organizes, supports, and expresses the main ideas. Varied sentence structure, accurate word usage, and correct spelling, punctuation, and capitalization will also affect the evaluation of your writing.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The CWE is an online writing lab that helps students develops good written communication skills. The Plagiarism Checker checks the originality of the author’s work; it makes sure the writer did not copy another author’s writing. Writepoint is a system that provides feedback on grammar errors and provides suggestions to correct the error. Tutorials and Guides help students improve grammar writing skills by providing tutorials on grammar principle and essays. The University Library provides a selection of academic information such as articles and books to help aid research data. All these tools can prepare students for their academic career.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    war and riches

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Refer to the scoring rubric on the last page to see how your essay will be scored.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    into the wild

    • 3704 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The sample student essays that follow reflect the EPT Scoring Guide’s criteria for their respective scores.…

    • 3704 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Yes This Is Great

    • 10846 Words
    • 44 Pages

    General Directions: This scoring guide will be useful for most of the essays that you read, but in problematic cases, please consult your table leader. The score that you assign should reflect your judgment of the quality of the essay as a whole—its content, its style, its mechanics. Reward the writers for what they do well. The score for an exceptionally well-written essay may be raised by one point above the otherwise appropriate score. In no case may a poorly written essay be scored higher than a three (3).…

    • 10846 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exam Prep

    • 12417 Words
    • 57 Pages

    The package is designed to assist students in preparing for the Diploma Examination in English 30-1. Publications such as The Key: Diploma Preparation Guide (published by Castle Rock Research Corp) may also be useful.…

    • 12417 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    War With Mexico

    • 2806 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Refer to the scoring rubric on the last page to see how your essay will be scored.…

    • 2806 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Virtual Child Assignment 2

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages

    5. Use complete sentences and correct punctuation and grammar. Your score will be reduced if there are grammatical errors and/or incomplete sentences.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 1322 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bibliography: Meador, D. (n.d.). Pros and Cons of Standardized Testing. Retrieved February 3, 2015, from http://teaching.about.com/od/assess/a/Standardized-Testing.htm…

    • 1322 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays