Top-Rated Free Essay

Australian Euthanasia Law

Good Essays
Euthanasia

Euthanasia means gentle or easy death for those who are incurably ill and in pain. So should a person have the right to take another person's life or his own when he/she is incurably ill and in pain. That is what whole of Australia is trying to decide. The N.T all ready has passed a law that legalise euthanasia in that state. Now other government leaders and members are in support of this are pushing for an Australian euthanasia law. Christian Groups and Anti-Euthanasia have seen euthanasia as a sin and a choice that no-body should make. Some doctors have taken ill patients life's as a request from the patient should this now be openly done.

On the 18/06/96, The head of the NT chapter of the Australia Medical Association,
Dr.Chris Wake, and Aboriginal leader Rev.Djiniynni Gondarra put forward the NT euthanasia law .But was dismissed by the NT Supreme Court. After appealing and with the support of three major party leaders the law was passed. Prime
Minister John Howard disapproved with the Law and saying that he has no problem reconciling his views on federalism with his views on life and death by voting to over turn the law. Also Kevin Andrews was strongly not in favour and with
Howard's support he introduced a bill overriding the N.T laws. But still in the end the law was still standing. If our leaders are divided we could say that the citizens of Australia would have been divided on this Issue. Maybe a referendum would have been appropriate, but still euthanasia would still occur illegal and secrecy.

Christian groups and Christian have strongly supported their view on euthanasia , they have seen it as a sin. For a Christian his life is not just his because his life is part of god's. In the Bible, chapter of (Romans 14:18) it states "If we live ,we are responsible to the Lord and when we die we are responsible to the
Lord. Both in life and death we belong to the lord. Christian view the death of a human person as their turn to meet god." As Christian Rights groups and Anti- euthanasia believe in these views they have protested in a number of occasions to stop any euthanasia Laws going ahead. As Christian's try to obey these laws it is wisely to say that most Christian's are not going to support euthanasia.

As in the advancement in technology and medicine why would people end their life.
There is always hope , miracles such as a Sydney man in 1990 with cancer was predicted to die in months ,but instead he was cured of cancer. Also new drugs are been invented each year. Drugs these days relieve pain and suffering .. How about if a person has to much pressure to deal with and can't cope, they might want to end their life ,can euthanasia be used? So where do we draw the line. If euthanasia was illegalised or used ,what should the reason be Medical, Physical or mental states. Most people that want to die are assisted by doctor of some medical profession. Should those people who save lives as occupation end them too. In the United states Dr Jack Kevorkian has brought a lot of publicity to euthanasia. He has assisted in about 40 deaths and been trailed for many but only convicted for less than 10% of those mercy killings. If this is happening everywhere wouldn't it be better if it was brought out in the open so it can be monitored. People that support euthanasia see that life is there's and theirs only. They might view that suffering people are less than human. Terms like a vegetable is used often. Are they really vegetables then you can tell me what kind? a cucumber? Carrot ? A human being is always a human no matter what. Support's of euthanasia might think that killing a terminally ill that want's to end this life would benefit the nation by decrease of unnecessary medical cost and etc.
But if this nation support's these view, then we are a nation with out a heart.

So should this whole nation legalise euthanasia? If they do some serious question must be answered like, when should a life be terminated? Put as a nation of about 55% of Christian's I can not see this happening to the whole of
Australia. In my heart I truly hope this is the case. Human's are never vegetables and should never be considered as vegetables. If they are in pain there are always drugs that can relieve that pain. So euthanasia should not be legalised throughout the rest of Australia. They have already made one mistake letting the N.T .Remember we were not the one to decided the time or manner in which we came into the world, why should we decided the time to leave this
world.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 2127 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Death, while a reality for all people, is still a frightening and unknown experience. That is one of the reasons that physician-assisted suicide is such a complex topic. However, when one is faced with the prospect of witnessing the suffering of a terminally ill loved one and watching them experience unbearable pain, despite the known fact that they will never again be healthy, the issue becomes less complex. Whether an actual experience or an imagined one, it is one of the worst situations an individual can endure. If offered the possibility to end the suffering and relieve the patient or loved one from pain, would you be supportive or would you leave them to suffer? Physician-assisted suicide could be the answer for the select few patients who meet strict requirements and who are in need of relief. Physician-assisted suicide refers to a practice in which a physician provides a competent, terminally ill patient with a prescription for a lethal dose of medication, upon the patient 's request, which the patient intends to use to end his or her own life. (Black) Here is where the controversy arises: should terminally ill patients have the right to choose when to end their lives? Due to the facts that physician-assisted suicide can be constructed to have reasonable laws that ensure it will not be abused and protect the value of human life, relieve suffering patients, and allow citizens in need to exercise their fundamental freedoms to the right of death, physician-assisted suicide should be a legal practice in the United States.…

    • 2127 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gospel Presentation

    • 1431 Words
    • 4 Pages

    perish but have eternal life.” God’s main purpose for us is to give us eternal life. This is a free…

    • 1431 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The act of killing is restricted by all religions. Religions possess that life is a gift from God and human beings are valuable. Islam totally opposes euthanasia. Furthermore, The Qur’an says that Allah created all life and everything belongs to him. In addition, Christianity also is against euthanasia. The arguments are usually based on the beliefs that life is given by God, and that human beings are made in God's image. However, some churches emphasize the significance of not being involved with the natural procedures of death. For instance, choosing the time and place of a person's death is God's decision. Yet, if doctors were to seek medical…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1967 referendum asked Australians to decide whether Aboriginals should be included in the national census, with over ninety per cent voting yes, many consider the referendum to be a great success. In that respect the referendum was indeed a success because the vast majority of voters wished to include Aboriginals in the census, but in many ways the poll was a failure. Some Aboriginals and many other Australians believed that the referendum would mean equality between the natives and the white Australians. Despite these beliefs, many if not most of the Aboriginals wishes and needs were not met. The referendums success meant that the federal government was able to make laws in relation to Indigenous Australians, meaning that the government was allowed to create laws promoting the racial discrimination of aboriginals.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Quiz 1 study guide

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages

    • The Christian has been saved from the guilt and penalty of sin and is…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia in Canada

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There is considerable debate today, both among the public and the politicians, about euthanasia. While the governmnt is hesitatant to venture into morals and ethics, it appears that euthanasia is gaining more press coverage, in light of the Sue Rodriguez and Robert Latimer cases. Indeed, the issue is difficult to resolve, and despite few advances, the government has enacted penalties in the Criminal Code to punish assisted suicide. Without reservation, euthanasia is illegal in Canada. Anincreasing number of people are turning to doctor-assisted suicide. As a result of a more liberal political arena, more people are agreeing that some form of euthanasia must be acceptable in specific circumstances. Politicians, and the courts, claim that the country is not yet ready for such a climate. The characterization of pro-euthanasia advocates by their counterparts as selfish, taking the easy way out, diserespectful of life, and challenging human dignity is misconstrued. Pro-euthanasia groups advocate self-dignity, personal choice, economic well-being, happiness, family support, and individual rights. The word euthanasia simply means good death, but has come to mean causing death with intent, whether by doing something (commission), or by omitting something(omission). Euphemisms of the pro-euthanasia movement, include "right to die", and "death with dignity". The term "passive euthanasia" is often applied to the withdrawal of useless treatment thatonly prolonging the dying of a person. This needs to be differentiated from withdrawing of something that is actually keeping them alive, the withdrawl of which actually causes their death. It has been pointed out that the pro- life lobby will be split and discredited if there is an insistence by some that all technological means must be used whenever possible to prolong life. No ethical doctor insists on the use of burdensome, ineffective of futile measure, commonly called 'disproportionate', when refused by the patient or…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia is a social issue in today’s world because not only does it affect the lives of those who are terminally ill and/or comatose, and the physicians who have been entrusted with their care, but it also affects the patient’s ability to have control over their own life, whether they are aware of this decision or not, which is one of the reasons why euthanasia has become such a controversial issue around the globe. Caddell and Newton (1995) define euthanasia as “any treatment initiated by a physician with the intent of hastening the death of another human being who is terminally ill and in severe pain or distress with the motive of relieving that person from great suffering” (p. 1,672). Even though the concept of great…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Physician Assisted Sucide

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages

    My Respond: On the either side the right or wrong those people have terminally ill that a person has to the right to choose to take their life or not but, my opinion is that it is still wrong to take your life.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics of Euthanasia

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Stephanie Clayton. "This House Believes that assisted suicide should be legalized." idebate.org. 16 Feb 2012. idebate.org, Web. 26 Oct 2012. http://idebate.org/debatabase/debates/philosophy/house-believes-assisted-suicide-should-be-legalized…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, people have the right to end their life when they choose because they do not want to suffer anymore. There are people in this world who live with a terminal illness knowing their days are numbered. Pain has been associated with death for a long time. No one, especially the people who are dying of an illness, want to die in pain. Patients tell doctors they would rather die at home than at…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Overall, most humans look for a dignified, peaceful death for themselves and their families/loved ones, whatever their stance is regarding Euthanasia”. However, the ethical issue arises when artificial termination of life if considered. Euthanasia advocates argue that being disallowed this practice is a breach of human rights, stating that all people should have a right to decide when and how their death should take place. Another pro-Euthanasia argument is to do with mercy, that if a person suffering intolerable pain which cannot be numbed by medication asks to end their life, that they should be given that right. People also believe that Euthanasia is inevitable anyway, and so it would be better for it to be carried out safely in order to prevent accidents.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    0004. “Individuals who engage in inhumane activities should face the death penalty thereby saving the taxpayer the cost of supporting their life of imprisonment.” `AN EYE FOR AN EYE WILL MAKE THE WHOLE WORLD BLIND; the famous quote spoken Mahatma Gandhi- the quote used countless timesby appeasers of the death penalty: The same death penalty that has not been used in Australia since 1967- which was then abolished by the federal government in 1973. Death penalty appeasers will argue that “The death penalty violates the right to life. It is cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment.”* This may be true, but aren’t the crimes of rape and murder even more so? Wouldn’t one feel justice had been served if your child was brutally murdered, or would…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    under the choice of the patient, choosing a painless medical death over suffering the symptoms…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    to assisted suicide in order to end their suffering and pain, give them an option to determine…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A person should have the right to say if they want to die. If someone is terminally ill and are in excruciating pain they should have the option of assisted suicide. If a person has an illness that they know will cause them pain and no medicine can cure, they should be able to decide their fate. When people hear…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays