top-rated free essay

Austin vs Hart

By thandothando Apr 17, 2013 275 Words
Legal positivism is the thesis that the existence and content of law depends on social facts and not on its merits. The English jurist John Austin (1790-1859) formulated it thus: “The existence of law is one thing; its merit and demerit another. Whether it be or be not is one enquiry; whether it be or be not conformable to an assumed standard, is a different enquiry.” (1832, p. 157) The positivist thesis does not say that law's merits are unintelligible, unimportant, or peripheral to the philosophy of law. It says that they do not determine whether laws or legal systems exist. Whether a society has a legal system depends on the presence of certain structures of governance, not on the extent to which it satisfies ideals of justice, democracy, or the rule of law. What laws are in force in that system depends on what social standards its officials recognize as authoritative; for example, legislative enactments, judicial decisions, or social customs. The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism, law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered, decided, practiced, tolerated, etc.); as we might say in a more modern idiom, positivism is the view that law is a social construction. Austin thought the thesis “simple and glaring.” While it is probably the dominant view among analytically inclined philosophers of law, it is also the subject of competing interpretations together with persistent criticisms and misunderstandings.

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • Legal Positivism: Hart, Austin, Bentham

    ...benefit those in power. Morals and sentiment do not play a role in the government, nor the rules that the government establishes. Legal positivism is a school of thought in the science of law or jurisprudence from the Latin term juris prudentia, which means "the study, knowledge, or science of law"; or in the United States, it is more broadly ...

    Read More
  • HLA HART

    ... Hart brought the tools of analytic, and especially linguistic, philosophy to face the problems of legal theory. But, if we look at the concept that he brought it is same with the Pure Theory of Law that being formulated by Austrian philosophers Hans Kelsen, thought Hart rejected a certain idea or distinctive feature of Kelsen’s theory. M...

    Read More
  • Consider H.L.a Harts Critique of Austin Positivist Theory of Law. Do You Think H.L.a Hart Succeeds in Develeping an Alternative Account of Law Which Is Persuasive

    ...Hart’s Concept of Law: Positivist Legal Theory or Sociology? Glen Wright This paper will consider the extent to which HLA Hart can be said to have turned the positivist tradition of legal thought from positivism to a sociology of law. Hart's claim to be engaging in 'descriptive sociology' is first considered, followed by the submission that Ha...

    Read More
  • austion,hart and kelson on sanction

    ...Austin, Hart and Kelson on Sanction as an integral part of law The term “sanction” is derived from Roman law. Sanction was originally that part of the statute which established a penalty or made other provisions for its enforcement. In the ordinary sense, the term sanction means mere penalty It can also be some motivating force or enco...

    Read More
  • The Hart-Fuller Debate

    ...THE HART-FULLER DEBATE It is important to consider, howbeit briefly, the academic exchanges between the proponents of legal positivism as represented by H.L.A. Hart and those of the natural law school represented by Lon Fuller. The gravamen of such academic discourse, usually tagged Hart-Fuller debate is to be found in the Harvard Law Revie...

    Read More
  • Hart and Positivism

    ...Joshua Brown Hart and Positivism According to Hart law consists of primary and secondary rules. The primary rules are the rules that are “rules of obligation.” (Hart. Pg 204) This means that primary rules are rules that obligate a person to do something or to not do something. For example, the first Amendment, “Congress shall make no ...

    Read More
  • The Hart V Devlin Debate

    ...as restricting multi-buy offers in shops and off-licences and promotions in bars, in an effort to reduce the nation’s consumption of alcohol, in particular binge drinking? Of particular interest in this area is the fascinating debate between H.L.A. Hart and Sir Patrick Devlin sparked by the publication of the Wolfenden Report on Homosexual Off...

    Read More
  • Dworkin and Hart

    ...just because the language of the law was absent. (2) Hart might criticize the majority opinion because he will believe that the justices have done a dishonor to the law. Regardless if the defendant attained the land through unmoral means, he did not violate any laws at that time. Social rules should not be taken into consideration with the l...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.