Preview

Arguments Against The Ratification Of The Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
465 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against The Ratification Of The Constitution
The Ratification of the Constitution There were many arguments for and against the ratification of the Constitution of the United States. The people that wanted the Constitution to be ratified and people who opposed it were called federalists and anti-federalists. They would get into heated arguments whether or not the Constitution should be ratified. The worst thing about the Constitution is it has no Bill of Rights to protect the people’s rights. Though the Constitution doesn’t have a Bill of Rights, it should be ratified because it would give the government a place to build off of so it would be able to protect the citizens and impose what needs to be imposed. Federalists are the people that supported the ratification of the Constitution.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    To What Extent Did The Constitutional Convention Of 1787
    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To What Extent Did The Constitutional Convention Of 1787

    Those in favor of the Constitution called themselves Federalists. Those opposing the Constitution and in favor of more power towards the states called themselves Antifederalists. One strong argument for the Antifederalists side was that the Constitution did not protect the liberties of the people (B). The Constitution did not include a bill of rights which displeased many Americans. When it came time to vote, there were many Antifederalists absent at the polls. Because the Federalists had such figures as Washington and Franklin on their side, as well as organized and aggressive strategies, they were victorious in making the Constitution the law of the United States. The final state to help put this into place was New Hampshire. Even though the majority had voted in favor of the Constitution, some states still opposed it, making them susceptible to succession. Through persuasive speeches and constant campaign, the Federalists won over the final states of New York and Virginia. After a huge demand for a bill of rights from the people, as well as the states of Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, the new government decided one shall be composed…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The US Constitution
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The US Constitution

    We can consider United States as new born nation and, United States are proud to have one of the oldest and strongest written constitutions in the world. The idea of new constitution awaken many colonial countries and political system that are running by monarchy system. Whether other countries are following the right step or not, it is undisputable that the U.S. stable Constitution’s ideologies have led people to reconsider how to organize and rebuilt their government political structures.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti Federalists Pros And Cons
    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page

    Anti Federalists Pros And Cons

    Anti-Federalists restricted approval of the Constitution and favored the adjustment of power being with the states. They trusted that a capable national government would wind up being overbearing and there will be loss of flexibility, higher assessments, and no power for state laws or courts. The fundamental worry for the Anti-Federalists in the Federalist paper #10 was fairness rights for the general population. It is the reason they affirmed of Article 4, since they bolstered the privileges of the general population and having full confidence and credit given to the states influenced them to feel that the privileges of the states would be maintained. The Anti-Federalists battled for the restriction of ratification in the Constitution just…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philanthropos Arguments Against The Ratification Of The Constitution
    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philanthropos Arguments Against The Ratification Of The Constitution

    Philanthropos, the anonymous author of Antifederalist No. 7, wastes no time in making his argument against the ratification of the Constitution. His main argument is that the adoption of the Constitution, as it stood at the time before ratification, would lead to a civil war. He claims that “the time in which the constitution or government of a nation undergoes any particular change, is always interesting and critical.” As a result of this statement, the author goes on to argue that adopting the new Constitution will cause instability and unrest among the people, ultimately resulting in war. Philanthropos uses dramatic language and exaggerated claims in order to get his point across. An example of this comes when he states: “Were they mine enemies, the worst imprecation I…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Evaluate Arguments for and Against the Ratification of the Constitution.
    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evaluate Arguments for and Against the Ratification of the Constitution.

    The year is 1776, American has just gained it’s independence from Great Britain. The Declaration of Independence has been signed and the United States has experienced a rebirth. What is next for this great country? The Articles of Confederation came and went because it didn’t really work for the states. The great idea of having a constitution for ALL the states came up which also brought up many debates, disagreements, and arguments within the states. After having ratified the constitution arose more debate and heated arguments between the states. This brought curiosity whether the Great United of America would survive because they had just beat the world’s strongest country and they are arguing over how to run their country? Doesn’t look so good for America. Although there were people who knew that America would make it through and be more successful than ever.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Are The Arguments Against The Articles Of Confederation
    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Are The Arguments Against The Articles Of Confederation

    After the United States won its independence, it was being governed by the Articles of Confederation( Schultz, 2010). It did not take long before they realized that they did not have the authority to levy taxes in order to repay debts incurred during the war. A delegate was sent from all thirteen colonies to Philadelphia in 1787 and the Constitutional Convention was established for the purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation. There were so many issues with the articles that the delegates decide to disregard them and draw up a new document. A solution would be found for all three of the main division at the convention; large states vs small states, slave states vs free states, and eastern states vs western states.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Ratification Research Paper
    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Ratification Research Paper

    The two stories, Arguments against Ratification at the Virginia Convention and The Federalist Papers, No. 45 are about the same subjects. Some ways that they are similar is they both are trying to convince states to vote for the ratification and they both have dedication and perseverance. The differences are the ways they get their word out there and the length of time their ways took.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federalist Vs Anti-Federalists
    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Federalist Vs Anti-Federalists

    The year of 1787, when delegates gathered in Philadelphia to the draft a new constitution for the country. Curtain groups of people at the time think that the old document "Article of Confederation" was going to divide this country apart. At the time, there were two parties, one opposed the idea of drafting the new constitution, the Anti Federalists. The other is the Federalist, who supported the idea. The Anti-federalists argued that the new constitution would post a threat to its people freedom and liberty. They said that the constitution would give the central government too much power, and at the end may ends up like their mother land, England. But, the Federalists have a totally different view on this matter. The federalists argued that…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Feds
    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Feds

    Anti-federalists opposed ratification of the constitution. They wanted a weak federal government that wouldn’t threaten states’ rights. Anti-feds also wanted a Bill of Rights to declare and protect the rights of people. “As long as we can preserve our unalienable rights, we are in safety.” They didn’t want any of their natural rights to be taken away. “It…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Should The Constitution Be Ratified?
    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Should The Constitution Be Ratified?

    During the summer of 1787, 55 men gathered in a hot, humid hall to craft what the most influential document of their era, the United States Constitution. This document was extremely radical and there was a lot of debate about whether this unconventional type of government is what was best for our country. Before the Constitution, were the Articles of Confederation which provided a very weak central government. This embodied the ideals of the new Americans, which were strong state and individual rights. However, this plan was eventually scrapped because it was nonfunctional due to the weakness of the central government. The Constitution was seemingly at the other end of the spectrum. Was is too similar to the government in Britain, which Americans fought to get away from? In a word, yes. Although the Constitution had some nuanced ideals, it should not have been ratified because states rights were not properly defended…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    third
    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    third

    For the constitution to be ratified, however, nine of the thirteen states were required to approve it in state conventions. Opposition to ratification ("Anti-Federalism") was partly based on the Constitution's lack of adequate guarantees for civil liberties.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Antifederalist Bill Of Rights
    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Antifederalist Bill Of Rights

    After creating the Articles of Confederation, the representatives of each state agreed to make a new, better form of government, the U.S. Constitution. When creating a constitution for our nations, certain citizens wanted to guarantee that there would be a Bill of Rights included in it. These people were called the antifederalist, and they wanted a Bill of Rights to assure that their individual rights would not be taken out of their possession.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution: The Ratification Of The Constitution
    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitution: The Ratification Of The Constitution

    The constitution is once created in 1787 is now still used by the country of The United States of America today. Now a great accomplishment, it took a little more than just one draft to be able to ratify it. The states that didn’t ratify the constitution at first definitely choice right compared to the states that agreed first. The states that didn’t ratify in the beginning chose wisely for with first ratifying there would not have been things such as. The reason is if they would have immediately agreed on the first draft of the constitution there would not have been any base rights that the citizens would have. 1“...the document lacked a legitimate Bill of Rights which would protect the rights of States and…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Texas Government
    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Texas Government

    Criticisms of the Constitution: Excessive wording Statutory detail (statute means a legislative act passed into law) (there’s a lot of laws in the constitution itself) Confusing and obsolete language (those terms belong to the 19 th century. SO they don’t make sense anymore today) Excessive amendments (467 amendments)…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ratifying the Constitution Dbq
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ratifying the Constitution Dbq

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Members of Congress believed that the Articles of Confederation, the first government of the United States, needed to be altered while others did not want change. After the Revolutionary War, there was a need for strong state centered governments, rather than a strong central government based on their experience as a colony. However, an investigation of the historical record reveals that the Articles of Confederation were not meeting the needs of Americans, and the need for a new Constitution was desired. This desired Constitution created a huge dispute and argument between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More