Preview

Argumentative Essay On Wikipedia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
944 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay On Wikipedia
Wonderful Wikipedia Writing papers and using the internet as a resource for information come hand in hand as a college student. However, is it safe to trust one of the most widely used and accepted forms of information on the internet today? The argument is brought forth in multiple articles concerning how Wikipedia has been used and abused over many years. Through the eyes of many viewpoints, though, Wikipedia can still relate to almost any topic and provide quality information. Individuals across the globe reveal the validity of its material by dedicating time and effort into creating source-worthy knowledge for readers to use. The incorporation of Wikipedia and how it can best be interpreted as a helpful, educational resource in academic …show more content…
However, most educators across the nation regard it as an unreliable source when citing and using information. This is contradictory to the fact that all of the information provided on any Wikipedia page is mostly provided by individuals who seem to have a better grasp on the material being covered than those rejecting its use as a resource. In the article, “So is Wikipedia Cracking Up?” a recent NYU professor did not advise his students to use Wikipedia as a source, until he spent time checking the accuracy of subject matter on topics he spoke of to his students (Foley). Being a professor and having a vast knowledge on a few chosen topics, he noted that Wikipedia articles are constantly updated and refreshed to help individuals with understanding certain material. In addition, the “never wrong for long” policy, enforced by Foley, relates to the amount of content incorrectly posted in Wikipedia entries. For example, “So is Wikipedia Cracking Up?” discusses how celebrity pages on Wikipedia are constantly being edited and a person could “get lost in Wikiworld” trying to make sense of it all (Foley). Some parts of the article also present underlying tones of irony since there is information on the article that is outdated (Steve Jobs still alive) when they’re expressing how Wikipedia is “never wrong for long.” By presenting differing situations to the readers, this article kept me interested and related to my generation throughout the entire piece, exhibiting that Wikipedia is updated consistently and is a reliable

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Randall McClure’s essay “Googlepedia” assesses current students’ predominate approach to research-based writing, and uses realistic ways to push such approaches further. He does this by analyzing two of his students’ methods. Of the strategies his students use, perhaps the most effective is Edward’s use of Wikipedia as a leaping off point, before delving further and entering search terms into Google (230). This practice should be just the beginning of an in-depth research process. However, Edward’s successional use of search engines does provide a template for an ideal research process. In addition, although he does not go nearly in depth, he does include an assessment of the author’s credibility (229). More rigorous assessment could greatly…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Lau, writer of the essay, “The Limitations of Wikipedia”, is successful in persuading his readers that the webpage Wikipedia should not be used for college level research. In his essay, Philip states that, “Wikipedia can be a beneficial starting point in gaining general information on a subject but users should be wary of incorrect information”. The essayist’s use of examples, facts and quotes are what makes his argument so convincing.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rector, Lucy Holman. (2008). Comparison of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles, Reference Services Review, Vol. 36 Iss: 1, pp.7 - 22. Retrieved December 19, 2010, from the World Wide Web:…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Mark Wilson’s article “Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia”, Wilson argues that despite the legitimacy of Wikipedia, educators should engage and take part in helping shape the direction of Wikipedia. In a test published in the journal “Nature”, articles in Wikipedia are said to be as revered as those in the “Encyclopedia Britannica.” Since the perceived lack of academic authority, Wilson suggests that those with research specialties should enroll as editors of Wikipedia to add, control, and learn from the information being provided. Wilson describes his own interaction with Wikipedia and how he, his students, and other colleagues have benefitted from the use of it. From becoming a Wikipedia editor and a collaborator with other colleagues, Wilson has “in turn taught some people how to properly reference ideas and information.” Wilson expresses his ideas to involve scholars with Wikipedia to make it more useful to students and the public. Wilson argues that Wikipedia is a source that although warned from, students will go to anyway to start projects, look up terms, and go for general information. If Wikipedia is “the largest coherent store of information and ideas” as stated by Wilson, then “teacher and scholars should have been on this train years ago for the benefit of our students and professions.”…

    • 885 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Credible sources are always a topic for debate. What is a credible source and what is not a credible source. By definition, credible means “offering reasonable grounds for being believed.” ("Merriam-Webster", 2011) Therefore a credible source is information that is true and believable. One of the sources that we discussed and debated in class is Wikipedia. “Wikipedia is an online open-content collaborative encyclopedia.......” "Wikipedia:general Disclaimer" (2011) So what about Wikipedia does or does not make it a credible source. Below I will discuss the debate outcomes, the arguments between both sides, and my reasoning for choosing the against side.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College life can be pretty stressful and complicate it at times. There are several things that can help college life become easier and more manageable. One of the main things and if not the most important it will be the ability to identify and separate credible online sources from non-credible ones. It is very true that technology has help make college life easier, with search engines such as Google or Bing at just one click away of distance. The only problem is that with so many choices to pick from how to tell if a source is even worth to look at without having to expend a great amount of time looking at each one through. Even though non-credible sources are easier to find, credible sources are more reliable because they are usually written by experts and have more substantial information in them. If we take a credible source like “Rising prevalence of cohabitation in United States may have partially offset decline in marriage rates” from the Family Planning Perspectives and compared against a non-credible sources like “Cohabitation in the United States” from Wikipedia, we can see that the article from the credible source has the components that help sort out a credible source from a non-credible.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Paper. Wikipedia

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Launched on 15 January 2001, Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia that uses the web platform for online users to access. Boasting with over 26 million pieces of writing in 285 languages, Wikipedia has transformed to be a giant in the field of search engines optimization technology. The open source concept that it rides have made it cheap to access and a better choice for many online users. This is especially among the users who find it cumbersome to follow prolonged registration processes to access information on the internet. Any search term queried on the Google™ home page search engine will definitely give a hit from the Wikipedia site, and if not present, a prompt will request the user to create a page for such a term. In this way, Wikipedia has extended the public space for an open system where the public can have their inputs to extend knowledge regardless of their academic backgrounds, race, religion, sex or any other biases. To achieve correct information dissemination, Wikipedia has endeavored to make sure the uploaded information is open to scrutiny and changes due to the emerging data and facts. This way, they achieve by subjecting the information to peer reviews and editing platform that is open to all users, with the exception of some website pages that require an initial formal request to edit changes.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evaluation of Wikipedia

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many people believe Wikipedia is not a good, or credible, source to be used for research. Much of this comes from the possibility it gives for people to alter the content of any material information offered by the website. Wikipedia “enables any visitor to a wiki site to edit, add to, and even delete the content of any page on the site.”(Miller) This is factual because Wikipedia gives the opportunity for any person to edit information on any topic. For protection it is recommended that we “remember to take a cautious view of what we think it tells us.”(Miller)…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the website Wikipedia, under the source entry “Wikipedia” goes into detail about all the attributes and information about Wikipedia and how it came about and why it is a reliable site to get information from. Wikipedia has become the largest and most popular general reference work on the Internet. Wikipedia is a reliable source because of its vandalism program in which it is able to detect and remove vandalism within a few minutes. Also with Wikipedia being a free online encyclopedia it allows for open structure, which lets the public write and change anything about any topic. On the Wikipedia website under the topic “Wikipedia”, found that “a non-scientific report in the journal Nature in 2005 suggested that for some scientific articles Wikipedia came close to the level of accuracy of Encyclopedia Britannica…”(preface). With that being said, it justifies that Wikipedia’s reliability is just as effective as that of a profitable encyclopedia that is written by experts.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article was was well stated and made me realize how dangerous using wikipedia as a…

    • 435 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A disadvantages of using Wikipedia as source is the issue of editors creditability. There are numerous debate on this subject across different academic departments because the website allows anyone contribute to the contents without verifying his academic credentials or expertise on the topic. In addition, most of contributors’ information is anonymous; therefore there is no name to attribute the quotations to and this prevents reliability because no one knows about the editor. Wikipedia publishes contents contributed by all its editors. An example is a medical topic regarding lung cancer. The contents reflect information from not just doctors but from accountants who may not understand the topic. This means that contents regarding lung cancer is not only updated by doctors specialized in the field but also by lawyers, dentist, etc. According to Miller and Murray (2010) “Thus, as a general rule, Wikipedia is not an appropriate source to rely on for technical information that would only be correct if the editor had specialized knowledge, like the public or private nature of…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    information. Wikipedia has proven to be too unreliable for a variety of reasons for it to be trusted…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Validity of Wikipedia

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although not considered to be a credible source for gathering information, Wikipedia is used by everyone in the academic community for obtaining information. The site was established in early 2001 and its purpose is an open source concept using information entered by registered users. The website provides information or description on anyone from the president of the United States to information about a Boeing 747. Higher learning institutions do not consider Wikipedia as a credible or valid source for gathering information. A group of students entering the MBA program and the University Of Phoenix was tasked to debate whether Wikipedia is a creditable and valid source of information.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Credible vs Non-Credible

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The web has become a major learning tool, with access to virtually anything one wants to know. With the web being so informative, it is imperative that we maintain a keen eye to distinguish what is a credible source as opposed to a Non-credible source.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics