Argumentative Essay On Wikipedia
Wonderful Wikipedia Writing papers and using the internet as a resource for information come hand in hand as a college student. However, is it safe to trust one of the most widely used and accepted forms of information on the internet today? The argument is brought forth in multiple articles concerning how Wikipedia has been used and abused over many years. Through the eyes of many viewpoints, though, Wikipedia can still relate to almost any topic and provide quality information. Individuals across the globe reveal the validity of its material by dedicating time and effort into creating source-worthy knowledge for readers to use. The incorporation of Wikipedia and how it can best be interpreted as a helpful, educational resource in academic
…show more content…
However, most educators across the nation regard it as an unreliable source when citing and using information. This is contradictory to the fact that all of the information provided on any Wikipedia page is mostly provided by individuals who seem to have a better grasp on the material being covered than those rejecting its use as a resource. In the article, “So is Wikipedia Cracking Up?” a recent NYU professor did not advise his students to use Wikipedia as a source, until he spent time checking the accuracy of subject matter on topics he spoke of to his students (Foley). Being a professor and having a vast knowledge on a few chosen topics, he noted that Wikipedia articles are constantly updated and refreshed to help individuals with understanding certain material. In addition, the “never wrong for long” policy, enforced by Foley, relates to the amount of content incorrectly posted in Wikipedia entries. For example, “So is Wikipedia Cracking Up?” discusses how celebrity pages on Wikipedia are constantly being edited and a person could “get lost in Wikiworld” trying to make sense of it all (Foley). Some parts of the article also present underlying tones of irony since there is information on the article that is outdated (Steve Jobs still alive) when they’re expressing how Wikipedia is “never wrong for long.” By presenting differing situations to the readers, this article kept me interested and related to my generation throughout the entire piece, exhibiting that Wikipedia is updated consistently and is a reliable
However, most educators across the nation regard it as an unreliable source when citing and using information. This is contradictory to the fact that all of the information provided on any Wikipedia page is mostly provided by individuals who seem to have a better grasp on the material being covered than those rejecting its use as a resource. In the article, “So is Wikipedia Cracking Up?” a recent NYU professor did not advise his students to use Wikipedia as a source, until he spent time checking the accuracy of subject matter on topics he spoke of to his students (Foley). Being a professor and having a vast knowledge on a few chosen topics, he noted that Wikipedia articles are constantly updated and refreshed to help individuals with understanding certain material. In addition, the “never wrong for long” policy, enforced by Foley, relates to the amount of content incorrectly posted in Wikipedia entries. For example, “So is Wikipedia Cracking Up?” discusses how celebrity pages on Wikipedia are constantly being edited and a person could “get lost in Wikiworld” trying to make sense of it all (Foley). Some parts of the article also present underlying tones of irony since there is information on the article that is outdated (Steve Jobs still alive) when they’re expressing how Wikipedia is “never wrong for long.” By presenting differing situations to the readers, this article kept me interested and related to my generation throughout the entire piece, exhibiting that Wikipedia is updated consistently and is a reliable