Argument Essay: Is the Death Penalty Effective?
Argument Essay: Is the death penalty effective?
Why should someone who killed an innocent person deserve to keep his or her life and get the possibility of parole, and living, when that other person had to die for no reason? I believe the death penalty is very effective, and is a good way to make the criminal fear the consequences of his or her actions. Deserved punishment protects society morally by restoring order, and making the criminal pay a price equivalent to the harm that he or she has done. It serves as a simple reminder to the public that crime does not get rewarded, and the killer will never again have the chance to kill. The death penalty gives closure to the victims of families who have endured the tragedy that many of us fear the most. When someone is executed who killed a family member, vengeance is a part of the emotions that everyone feels. Families of murder victims would get a sense of closure knowing the person who took the life of their loved one would not be afforded the same opportunity again. The void they had for so long would seem to be filled. When the perpetrator is finally put to death, it is somewhat a personal revenge in my mind; most people just want to see the person suffer like the victim did. Our justice system always shows more sympathy for criminals rather than victims, when criminals on death row have more than likely committed many crimes, and should be put to death. It also creates another form of crime deterrent. Crime would be out of control if there wasn't some way to stop people from committing the acts that they do. Televised executions actually deter crime even more because people often react more to what they see rather than what they imagine. People fear nothing more than death. If somebody knows he or she is risking death for committing a crime, he or she may think twice before doing so. It provides a deterrent for prisoners already serving a life sentence. Many prisoners still kill in
Why should someone who killed an innocent person deserve to keep his or her life and get the possibility of parole, and living, when that other person had to die for no reason? I believe the death penalty is very effective, and is a good way to make the criminal fear the consequences of his or her actions. Deserved punishment protects society morally by restoring order, and making the criminal pay a price equivalent to the harm that he or she has done. It serves as a simple reminder to the public that crime does not get rewarded, and the killer will never again have the chance to kill. The death penalty gives closure to the victims of families who have endured the tragedy that many of us fear the most. When someone is executed who killed a family member, vengeance is a part of the emotions that everyone feels. Families of murder victims would get a sense of closure knowing the person who took the life of their loved one would not be afforded the same opportunity again. The void they had for so long would seem to be filled. When the perpetrator is finally put to death, it is somewhat a personal revenge in my mind; most people just want to see the person suffer like the victim did. Our justice system always shows more sympathy for criminals rather than victims, when criminals on death row have more than likely committed many crimes, and should be put to death. It also creates another form of crime deterrent. Crime would be out of control if there wasn't some way to stop people from committing the acts that they do. Televised executions actually deter crime even more because people often react more to what they see rather than what they imagine. People fear nothing more than death. If somebody knows he or she is risking death for committing a crime, he or she may think twice before doing so. It provides a deterrent for prisoners already serving a life sentence. Many prisoners still kill in