Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Are You Insane?

Better Essays
1128 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Are You Insane?
Are You Insane? by Cassidy Meade “The statistics on sanity are that one out of every four people is suffering from a mental illness. Look at your 3 best friends. If they're ok, then it's you” said Rita Mae Brown. The definition for ‘insanity’ is the state of being seriously mentally ill. There are most likely multiple different definitions, but this was the most broad. Insanity can, in a way, have benefits. For example, a person accused of a crime can admit that they committed the crime, but may claim that they are not accountable for the crime due to the fact they have a mental illness by pleading "not guilty by reason of insanity." The insanity defense mirrors a negotiation on the part of society and the law. Society believes that criminals should be punished for their crimes but society also believes that people who are ill should receive treatment for their illness. This is where the insanity defense comes in play. Essentially, it reflects the beliefs of society that the law should not penalize defendants who are incapable due to mental dysfunction and cannot control their conduct. In the 18th century, the authorized principles for the insanity defense were different. A lot of courts looked to see whether the defendant could make a distinction between moral and immoral, or good and evil. There were some courts that used that the defendant "did not know what he was doing." By the 19th century, it was normally acknowledged that insanity was a question of circumstance, and was left for the jury to choose. The insanity plea, also identified as the insanity defense, is a type of criminal defense employed by defendants, in order to weaken the offense that they have either committed or being accused of. In most cases, the defendant pleads guilty, but not at fault due to a mental disability. When a defendant brings the insanity plea into a case, they are claiming that the crime that they have been accused of was not done on purpose but rather they cannot be held accountable for the offense due to the fact that they are legally insane. It is important to notice that there is a difference between insanity and a mental illness. A “mentally ill” individual will often have weakened accountability, but the insanity plea seldom reduces an individual's charge. If the insanity plea is going to work, the defendant must be confirmed legally insane by a doctor. The process of being examined to be considered mental insane requires an extensive medical checkup. In most trials, the defendant that has pleaded that they are insane will be expected to spend time in a psychiatric hospital.
The insanity plea is a type of affirmative defense. An affirmative defense is a complete or partial defense to a civil or criminal claim based on facts other than those alleged by the plaintiff or prosecutor. When this type of defense is used, the defendant does not deny that the crime they are being accused of is false. The defendant actually admits that they are guilty of the crime. Here is when the insanity plea comes into play. The insanity plea proposes that the individual had a mental state that was not capable to recognize or control their behavior, or even ponder the penalties during the time that the crime was being committed. From the website Trial Laws with no stated author of the article published in 2013 stated, “If a defendant was not able to recognize the difference between wrong and right, than he/she cannot be held liable for the crime. In the United States, the insanity plea is not used to prove a defendant's innocence or dismiss his/her case. Instead, it is often used to reduce the severity of the conviction and sentence acquired by the defendant.”
There are many cases in which the insanity plea has been made, and as of late, it seems as though it is being used more and more. This could be because it is becoming something that is getting other individuals dismissed from a crime, and is seen as an “easy-out.” A case that I am sure that we are all familiar with is the theatre shooting down in Colorado. From the article, published in 2013, by Keith Coffman was this quote, “The judge overseeing the murder case in the Colorado movie theater massacre refused to overturn provisions of an insanity-defense law that attorneys for the suspected gunman say would violate the rights of the accused to avoid self-incrimination.” The shooter, James Holmes, was not only charged with numerous counts of first-degree murder, but also attempted murder for the shooting during "The Dark Knight Rises" Batman movie. Holmes killed 12 individuals and injured 58 others in he Aurora, Colorado shooting. His lawyers filed motions for his trial stating that he was mentally insane. The state of Colorado requires a defendant who claims an insanity defense to have examinations done by court-appointed psychiatrists. His lawyers argued that this would be violating his Fifth Amendment, the guarantee of protection against self-incrimination. But Judge William Sylvester stated that the issues raised by defense lawyers were impulsive. From the previous stated article was this quote, "The Colorado appellate courts have confirmed that statements made during, or observations acquired from, a defendant's court-ordered mental examinations are admissible to prove the defendant's sanity." Former Colorado district attorney Bob Grant said the outbreak of pleadings filed by defense lawyers is common in potential death penalty cases. This shows that the insanity plead is used when there are serious consequences on the line.
In closing, insanity can indeed benefit people. There are many steps in which you have to take to plead insane and can even be seen as a joke. Is it worth it? To some, yes, to others not so much. “I would say any behavior that is not the status quo is interpreted as insanity, when, in fact, it might actually be enlightenment. Insanity is sorta in the eye of the beholder.” Said Chuck Palahniuk.

Reference Page 1. Facts about the insanity plea. (2013). Retrieved from http://trial.laws.com/plea/insanity-plea 2. Insanity defense. (2010, August 19). Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/insanity_defense 3. Coffman, K. (2013, March 8). Judge in theater shooting case rebuffs insanity-defense law challenge. Yahoo News. Retrieved from http://news.yahoo.com/judge-theater-shooting-case-rebuffs-insanity-defense-law-194657146.html 4. Callahan, L., Steadman , H., McGreevy, M., & Robbins, C. (1991). The volume and characteristics of insanity defense pleas: An eight-state study. (4th ed., Vol. 19, pp. 331-338). 5. Insanity defense. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.all-about-forensic-psychology.com/insanity-defense.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This means that the guilty individual receives the fairest possible sentence. A comparison to another insanity defense used, was the case of the Esposita brothers who had clearly faked being insane to get out of a death sentence. The Esposita brothers set a plan to gain money through robbery and were well equipped to take lives if anyone stood in the way. Both brothers were charged for murder of police officers and citizens. During their court trial, the Esposita brothers pretended to show signs of insanity by speaking in gibberish and banging their heads against the table. The jury was not convinced due to lack of evidence showing past history of insanity and had sentenced them to death by electrocution in 1942. This is one of many cases where a criminal had attempted to get out of a deserving consequence by using the insanity defense. Although it is rarely the case, some criminals convince the judge that they truly are insane when in fact, they were simply successful in fooling the judge. In comparison to the case of Dennis Pozniak who clearly was insane, it was determined that there was no benefit to the actions performed by Dennis and it was simply a spontaneous event that was brought due to an insane state of mind. Is it fair for an individual to get out of their deserved consequence simply because they convinced the judge that they are insane? I believe that unless the…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense is not covered as its own constitutional right, although it faults under the due process clause in the 5th and 14th amendments. The states define their own elements for what constitutes insanity, using the common law as a guideline. Mens rea—Latin for the “guilty mind” — is one of the necessary elements for insanity. If found incompetent, the person is usually charged to…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eddie Routh Case Study

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense is only raised in 1% of cases and then only successful 25% of the time it is used; although its rarity, the legal court has very detailed rules. Most rules describe not guilty by reason of insanity as not being aware of what you were doing in that exact moment. Adam Banner suggests that the Eddie Routh case had an accurate ruling of guilty because of his claim that, “...the disposition is ‘not guilty by reason of insanity’. It is not ‘not guilty by reason of mental illness’,”. Only Mental Health America would disagree, stating, “The Court has indicated that states may be required to provide at least some minimal defense based on mental illness,”. Coincidently, these changes have not been made thus…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guilty by reason of insanity: The criminal is not guilty because they do not know right from wrong.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy/270 Mind over Matter

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mental illness is a health condition that affects a person’s thoughts, behavior, and emotions (in some cases all three) which in turns affects the person’s ability to function in their daily lives. Insanity (used as a legal term) is an individual who is diagnosed with a mental illness, unable to know right from wrong, and is unable to function accordingly.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Frontline, it is used in “less than 1 percent of felony cases, and is successful in only a fraction of those” (Insanity defense faqs). Less than one percent, that’s how many times the insanity defense is used. According to the National Institute of Corrections, “In a 2006 Special Report, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) estimated that 705,600 mentally ill adults were incarcerated in State prisons, 78,800 in Federal prisons and 479,900 in local jails” (Mentally ill persons). Look at those numbers. The number of mentally ill adults incarcerated in state, federal and local prisons or jails is a staggering one million two hundred sixty four thousand three hundred mentally ill, that is 1,264,300 incarcerated in the United States. Why then, is the percentage less than1% when it comes to those who use the insanity defense during court? The Sentencing Project says that there are “2.2 million people currently in the nation's prisons or jails” (Incarceration). According to the numbers, the mentally ill make up more than 1% of those incarcerated. In fact, the mentally ill in the prison system is at 57% of those in the entire prison system. How is it that 57% of inmates in prison are mentally ill, but only 1% use the insanity defense? What is wrong with the insanity defense then? For starters, it is difficult to prove and the burden of proof lies on the…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense should be allowed for those with a mental illness when they commit a crime since they are not in control of their actions. “If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets,” (12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense [Web log post]. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16,…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Excuse Defense Process

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An excuse defense is to plead insanity. In order for some one to be excused by the defense of insanity, there defense attorney must prove that the defendant did not have the necessary mental capacity to be held responsible for his or her actions at the time of the crime. There are different test that could be taken to help an insanity plea. The different tests include: the M’Naughten rule, which is a right vs. wrong test; the irresistible impulse test; the Durham rule, which could also be called the products test, where the criminal act was the product of a mental defect or disease; and the substantial capacity test (Criminal Justice in Action, 2006). An example of a justification defense is to Self Defense. In order for Self Defense to be justified the defense attorney must prove that the defendant acted in a manner to defend himself or herself or they acted in the manner to defend other people, or even property. The self defense plea could also be justified if the defendant acted in the manner to prevent the commission of a crime. These are just a few examples of how self defense could be…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The author of this paper argues several reasons why the insanity plea should be changed or either eliminated. The reasons are considered and supported by evidence. The conclusion states that insanity should be altered or eliminated for the safety and well being of society.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For starters, the expression, the courtroom definition, and the psychiatrist term of the word “insanity” are all different and all have different connotations. In order to be considered insane in today’s court, you have to be completely separated from reality. As described by Vaknin, “A perpetrator should go unpunished - and be hospitalized instead - only if he is found to be completely divorced from reality by diagnosticians from both sides, a far cry from today’s insanity defense” (2). To prove that a suspect is in fact separated from reality, a few things have to be proven. The first thing to be proven is if the suspect had a diminished capacity. Macbeth showed that he was mentally impaired when he brought the daggers back instead of putting them with the guards and smothering them with blood. Although he knew that he was killing, he was not stable enough to carry out the entire crime. After the first crime, he could not control his behavior anymore. It became out of hand and he wasn’t able to control it anymore. He felt the urge to kill; which proves that he had an irresistible impulse which could no longer be controlled. In a way, he also lacked criminal intent. While he intended to kill, he did it because he believed that killing the king was what he was meant to do.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When someone uses the word “insanity,” the human mind may potentially go many in many different directions when defining it. One person may claim that the definition is “doing something over and over again and expecting a different result,” however, many other people believe in using the words “crazy” or “mad” to associate with insanity. Insanity is many things, but overall, it is something that affects the human body and mind in horrid, terrifying ways over a period of time. What causes insanity? The main cause among mental instability and other causes, is isolation. Isolation can cause horrifying changes to the human body and mind and can cause a mediocre human being to go dashing into the embrace of insanity.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So does a person who committed crime can use insanity defense as an excuse for his/her actions? Insanity defense can be a possible escape to a crime but in order to affirm that the defense of insanity or the insanity plea. Critics argue that some defendants misuse it, effectively faking insanity to win a release or less severe convictions. The controversy of this debate will never end. The insanity defense reflects the perception that the person who cannot be liable of their actions should not be punished for criminal…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, a criminal who is charged with raping a child would plea insanity because to other…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Insanity Defense

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The insanity defense, also known as the mental disorder defense, is a defense by excuse in a criminal case, arguing that the defendant is not responsible for their actions due to an episodic or persistent psychiatric disease at the time of the criminal act. The…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays