Pros And Cons Of Insanity Defense

Controversies of Insanity Defense This is a tough subject and the argument about this is never ending. Does a person who committed crime can use insanity defense as an excuse for his/her actions? The insanity defense reflects the generally accepted belief that the person who cannot appreciate the consequences of their actions should not be punished for criminal acts. Most states regulate the defense with statues, but a few states allow the courts to craft the rule for its proper use. Insanity defense can be a possible escape to a crime but in order to certify that the defense of insanity or the insanity plea, the defense must declare that he or she is not liable for their actions because of mental problems. The defendant must assert that
And often the cases involving an insanity plea gets the most attention because they involve crime that are bizarre within themselves. On February 22, 2016 an article name “Maryland Mom Found Not Responsible in Boy Death in Swing” was release. This article shares with us that Simms was found not responsible in her son’s death. Simms was found pushing her son in a park swing for 40 hours until he died from hypothermia and dehydration. “She was then ruled not criminally responsible, Maryland's equivalent to not guilty by reason of insanity.”(Ahn) She was later found not responsible since she was declare to have schizophrenia. She was ruled not to be a danger to the community and was freed on a conditional release. So does a person who committed crime can use insanity defense as an excuse for his/her actions? Insanity defense can be a possible escape to a crime but in order to affirm that the defense of insanity or the insanity plea. Critics argue that some defendants misuse it, effectively faking insanity to win a release or less severe convictions. The controversy of this debate will never end. The insanity defense reflects the perception that the person who cannot be liable of their actions should not be punished for criminal