Preview

APUSH Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
298 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
APUSH Essay
Farboad Rahmatipour T-4
How did state rights and major political personalities contribute to the reemerging of a two party system in the period 1820 to 1840?
Between 1820 and 1840 there were many contributes to the reemergence of a two party system in America. Major political personalities and states’ rights were among the major contributors. Using their influence in the government and people, many major political personalities were able to remerge the two different parties and influence the view of each party. Conflicts and arguments over state rights also ultimately helped the two party system reemerge by creating contrast in the views of states and their people.
States’ rights was a major issue that contributed to the reemergence of a political parties. Jackson proposed that once the federal debt had been paid off, the government would be able to distribute the extra money among the states. This angered the westerners because if the government gave the extra money to the states then it would not be able to lower the price of public land. The west proposed an alliance with the south based on this idea. Daniel Webster was able to prevent this from happening with a speech showing the position of states right to treason. This incident helped in the division of political ideas that led to a separation of political parties.
Both Jackson and Calhoun were not very different in the ideas about America except in the idea of a states right to overrule federal authority. The two of them became almost enemies and there were many times they each would attack the others personal character to try and gain what they wanted. In the end the different views of the two men influenced the views and stances of the political parties and created issues, which further divided the nation.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The two-party system was formed by the end of Jackson’s presidency. [1] Although both parties, Jacksonian Democrats and Whigs, grew out of the same roots of the Jeffersonian republicanism, each bore different political philosophy and policy. For example, the Whigs welcomed the involvement of government and favored protective tariffs. They believed in internal improvements, schools and black colonization with the federal finance. They also advocated the regulation of currency and credit based on the similar idea of the Bank of the United States. Furthermore, the party supported moral, intellectual, economic advance, and the state school systems as well as a soft approach to the Indian removal. The Whigs emphasized principles of system and disciplines…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Calhoun had won the people while in office and returned for his second term as Vice President. Calhoun had supported his bid for the presidency. Jackson and Calhoun were not very similar as people. One is a military hero and the other a rigid intellect. There partnership started off on the wrong foot when Jackson pushed for an increase in the protective tariff. Calhoun strongly opposed this idea. He believed that the protective tariff heavily favored the north and hindered the southern states. Jackson had begun to develop high tariff legislation while Calhoun was still in office under John Quincy…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1828 a new party, the Democrats, captured the White House. By the 1830s the Democrats faced an equally vigorous opposition party, the Whigs. This two-party system institutionalized divisions that had vexed the Revolutionary generation and came to constitute an important part of the nation’s checks and balances on political power.…

    • 4003 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps the three most influential men in the pre-Civil War era were Henry Clay, John C. Calhoun, and Daniel Webster. These men all died nearly a decade before the civil war began, but they didn't know how much they would effect it. States' rights was a very controversial issue, and one which had strong opposition and radical proposals coming from both sides. John C. Calhoun was in favor of giving states the power to nullify laws that they saw unconstitutional, and he presented this theory in his "Doctrine of Nullification". Daniel Webster strongly disagreed with this proposal and showed this by giving powerful support to President Jackson in resisting the attempt by South Carolina to nullify the ‘tariff of abominations', as they called it; a shipping tax passed in 1828 that they saw as unfairly favoring the industrial North. Henry Clay, the Great Compromiser, didn't seem to be partisan either way, and, although he was a Whig, always came up with a way to please both sides of any argument.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1830’s marked a new beginning in American Politics; the Second Party System. This is a period in time where the Whigs and Democrats emerged as the major political parties. The Whig Party was created by those who were against Presidents Jackson’s policies and who opposed the Democratic Party, while the Democratic-Republicans converted to Democrats. Although both parties aided in democratization, the parties ran on very different platforms (Norton, 2015).…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the beginning of the nineteenth century, the Republicans and Federalists had developed into two distinct political parties. The controversy over the constitutionality of the First Bank of the United States gave rise to two different interpretations of the Constitution. While the Jeffersonian Republicans held a strict-constructionist view of the Constitution, the Federalists took on a broad-constructionist view of the Constitution. These became defining characteristics of the two political parties. However, during the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, the desire of one party to dominate over the other caused both parties to stray away from their original philosophies of government and resort to the other party’s principles. Although the Republicans and Federalists largely stayed true to their respective interpretations of the Constitution, they increasingly embraced the other party’s principles to achieve their goals between 1801 to 1817.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democrats DBQ

    • 597 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the disparities in the views and actions of the Jacksonian Democrats involved social equality. Jackson repeatedly held sectionalist views and did things that were better for the average, poor community than for the country as a whole. One such example of this is shown in Documents B and C involving the National Bank. In his National Bank veto message in Document B, Jackson says, "It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their selfish purposes." Jackson singles out the wealthier class and accuses them of being selfish. Because this ridiculous comment has no intelligent purpose other than to create an enormous, nationwide class clash, it must be seen as evidence that Jackson was a sectionalist. Daniel Webster responded to this message in Document C by stating, "It manifestly seeks to inflame the poor against the rich … for the purpose of turning against them [the other class] the prejudices and the resentments of the other classes." Daniel Webster is saying what was previously mentioned. It was as though Jackson was trying to anger the poor to turn against the rich. Jackson's actions show that his primary goal was not to help the country, but to address his own personal issues. This completely contrasts the Jacksonian Democrats view of themselves. The Jacksonians thought that they were acting in the best interest of the country, where they were truly thinking about their own needs.…

    • 597 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    apush

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Discuss the rise of political parties in the United States. Did the Constitution provide for political parties? If not, when and why did the two parties develop? Who led and supported each party?…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The two party framework is established in the beginnings of the country itself. The exceptionally way that the country started with a two-party framework need been an heading adrift purpose behind those maintenance of a two-party framework. In time, it need turned into an progressively important, self-reinforcing motivation behind. A few offers of the american electing framework have a tendency should push the presence from claiming at two major parties. Republican and Democratic. Americans are, on the whole, a ideologically homogeneous people. That is, through time, the American people bring imparted huge numbers of the same ideals, the same essential standards and the same examples from claiming conviction.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Essay

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Women were definitely a part in the economic, political, and social changes of the progressive era. These individuals who wanted more rights for females were able to achieve this after making organizations and being tenacious while protesting.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United states in the twenty-first century is mainly a two-party system. Despite the fact that more than two political parties remain, numerous of American citizens favor to choose between the two big factions, now called Democrats and Republicans, exchanged principle, focuses, beliefs, and delegates innumerable periods in American history.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The establishment of the two-party system dates back to 1787, when the first major political division occurred between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. This precedent of a two party system has since continued and the two-party system continues to thrive today. (Sidlow and Henschen 164) The main reason the two-party system is still thriving today is because with the various election laws in place and the different institutional barriers there is no other alternative.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tariff Crisis

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The crisis over the Tariff of 1828 continued into the 1830s and highlighted one of the currents of democracy in the Age of Jackson: namely, that many southerners believed a democratic majority could be harmful to their interests. These southerners saw themselves as an embattled minority and claimed the right of states to nullify federal laws that appeared to threaten state sovereignty.…

    • 1317 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American? Write an essay in which you assess the causes of the two party system and its…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When the United States was still an infant, George Washington, who was not affiliated with any political party, warned his countrymen against amassing too many political parties. He feared that the electoral fractures wouldn’t be sustained well by a nation that had just begun to unite. In the years following Washington’s inaugural presidency, a two-party system was initiated with John Adams’ Federalists opposing Thomas Jefferson’s Democratic-Republicans. The Whigs came next, followed by the now-familiar Democrats and Republicans, but there were never more than two dominant parties in this country at any one time. Our current configuration of Democrats and Republicans has been in place since the 1860s.…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays