Preview

AP US History: Exam

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1641 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
AP US History: Exam
Writing In AP US History

U.S. History Essay Writing / Exam Information
The AP U.S. History Exam is 3 hours and 15 minutes long and includes both a 100-minute multiple-choice / short-answer section (Part I) and a 95-minute free-response section (Part II). Each section is divided into two parts, as shown in the table below. Student performance on these four parts will be compiled and weighted to determine an AP Exam score. AP Scores are 5 – 1.

Section
Question Type
Number of Questions
Timing
Percentage of Total Exam Score
I
Part A: Multiple-choice questions
55 questions
55 minutes
40%

Part B: Short-answer questions
4 questions
45 minutes
20%
BREAK
II
Part A: Document-based question (DBQ)
1 question
60 minutes
25%

Part B: Long essay question (LEQ)
1 question (chosen from a pair)
35 minutes
15%

College Board Historical Thinking Skills
Historical Argumentation: Historical thinking involves the ability to define and frame a question about the past and to address that question by constructing an argument. A plausible and persuasive argument requires a clear, comprehensive and analytical thesis, supported by relevant historical evidence—not simply evidence that supports a preferred or preconceived position. Additionally, argumentation involves the capacity to describe, analyze and evaluate the arguments of others in light of available evidence.

Use of Relevant Historical Evidence: Historical thinking involves the ability to identify, describe and evaluate evidence about the past from diverse sources (including written documents, works of art, archaeological artifacts, oral traditions and other primary sources), with respect to content, authorship, purpose, format and audience. It involves the capacity to extract useful information, make supportable inferences and draw appropriate conclusions from historical evidence while also understanding such evidence in its context, recognizing its limitations and assessing the points of view that it reflects.

Historical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Study Questions for Mann, 1491 1. Until quite recently, most American history textbooks taught that before Europeans invaded the Americas Indians were savages who lived in isolated groups and had so little impact on their environment that it remained a pristine wilderness. We now know from scientific discoveries that this account was wrong. What is the effect of learning that most of what we have assumed about the past is "wrong in almost every aspect," as Mann puts it on page 4?…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    US History Exam

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Spain and other areas west of Mississippi closed the mouth of the Mississippi River to American shipping, which had a tremendous effect on western settler’s products. Congress operated as if Native Americans were conquered people, but afterwards there was here say that Spanish agents were rushing American frontiersmen to withdraw from the new nation and join with Spain. During these problems there was little that Congress could do.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    They were Portuguese explores during the Age of Exploration. Prince Henry sponsaved expeditions and Vasco found trade route to India…

    • 2391 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S. history exam and the AP English Language and Composition exam. This course is truly…

    • 2688 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AP US History

    • 2573 Words
    • 11 Pages

    C) the creation of a more united country D) the alliance of the Northeast and Northwest…

    • 2573 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paperwork of HIS 204 New Ver Week 3 Quiz you will find the answers on the next questions:…

    • 696 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Questions for Ap Us History

    • 3857 Words
    • 16 Pages

    ADVANCED PLACEMENT UNITED STATES HISTORY SUMMER 2013 READING ASSIGNMENT CHAPTER 1: "Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress" (pp. 1-11)…

    • 3857 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanley Harrison's Death

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Has Been Learnt About Historical Explanation and Method What I have learnt about historical explanation is that you cannot always be one hundred per cent right about what has happened. For example; during a war there are two sides, the side that is portrayed as the “good guys” and the side that is seen as the “bad guys”, if information is only collected from one side, how is one to know that the first hand evidence one receives is to be true? Only by the collaboration of evidence and information from both sides can you be sure to receive the right story. As a historical writer or…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bantu peoples in Africa civilizations in Mesoamerica and the Andes medieval Europe Answer: The social structures of the Hindu caste system, the Bantu peoples of Africa, and medieval Europe differed greatly. Some structures were given different names while others just consisted of different kinds of people. Each class also had different responsibilities to their community, specifically the lowest and highest class members. The Hindu caste system only had four major classes which they gave different names based on their creator-god’s body parts, the Bantu people only had one ruling class, and the medieval Europeans had three classes which they called estates.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Discuss the roles of language and reason in history. History as the area of knowledge is virtually indivisible from language and reasoning. Language is one of the most potent means of interpreting and reporting historical information that is derived from the sources pertinent to the events and occurrences. The sources themselves, in their turn, are frequently presented by the written documents, recorded anecdotal experiences, and works of art, archeology, anthropology and photography which, yet again, are interpreted through the language in conjunction with the context of a historical event. It appears to be an endless loop, where language is the alpha and omega, the main vehicle of conveying history. However, to arrive to the valid interpretation of a certain historical event or development, historians frequently use reasoning to connect the factual data of the tangible sources since the latter ones often come in the form of fragments, related to a particular aspect of the happening. Ideally, reasoning, applied to the interpretation of historical data, should be impersonal, unaffected by predominant views and opinions and completely untainted by political agenda. Yet, it is hard to imagine that throughout the centuries those who held power would willingly allow the contemporary historians relate to the masses the adequate information on the details of their governing techniques and actions. As Winston Churchill pointed out, “History will be kind to me for I intend to write it.” Therefore, it is up to an individual to interpret the language, deduce information through applying reasoning, incorporate other areas of knowledge such as science, sociology, psychology and arrive to conclusions in attempts to comprehend historical developments in question.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history we have had a variety of sources of historical evidence in order to support the past events, both primary and secondary. Primary sources are objects or documents that come from that specific time in history. Secondary sources are sources where someone explains a past event through his/her own opinion and knowledge. For example, a primary source is the Magna Carta, which is the basis of British governing principles. This document was an attempt to limit King John’s powers by law and protect society’s privileges. It is the foundation of constitutional monarchies. A secondary source would be Arnold Toynbee’s “A Study of History”, an interpretation of the rise and fall of western civilization. This summarises primary sources by analysing the causes and effects of events, and draws conclusions based on evidence. The difficulty here is that the historian can be selective with facts and include only those that support his theory. One of the problems of both types of sources is that they can contain bias that can be mis-interpreted.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The human science of history very much differs from the other human sciences studied in theory of knowledge. History is the only social science that is solely based on facts from the past while Geography, Psychology and others are more dependent on the future. Other areas of research like science are also solely based on creating new knowledge that might eventually turn into history. Historians have to evaluate every piece of evidence they get based on principles of bias, time of creation and who created it. Now one has to see whether the ability to analyze evidence scientifically is more vital to an historian as the ability to develop interpretations of evidence using creative imagination. To analyze this in a way adequate for theory of knowledge one has to consider how the ways of knowing coincide with history and then see which of the two abilities is more useful to an historian. In this piece of writing I will debate on the basis of why the ability to analyze evidence scientifically is so much more important compared to the ability to develop interpretations of evidence using creative imagination. The use of creative imagination allows the historian to perhaps alter the information if wrongly interpreted in a way that contradicts the original meaning of the piece of history.…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theory of Knowledge

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages

    History is the area of knowledge which records and analysis the past events. History pays a key component in understanding the temporal nature of human life. We acquire knowledge of history through two main ways of knowing, language and reason. Language is the way which we communicate history; therefore it defines what we understand through communicating events and facts. Reason, which can be seen through proof and knowledge is vital in assessing the validity of historical claims. Language and reason are essential in the understanding of history.…

    • 1562 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Period Period Title Date Range Weight to c. 600 B.C.E. 5% Organization and Reorganization of…

    • 14906 Words
    • 100 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nadia Lotze 000 865-015 Mr Skeoch History is the past written by the present. The very nature of this statement creates the predicament of historical knowledge. The historians of the present are under constant pressure of rapidly changing society; therefore what we discover from the past is dependent on our perceptions that are forever changing. History and historical explanations are deduced and manipulated by the two ways of knowing, language and reasoning. The role of language in history is very important, because history is written, presented and illustrated to people through language. Reasoning is also an important factor in history; through reasoning historian create a historical record and decipher as logically possible a conclusion. In this essay, the roles and the importance of language and reasoning in history will be explored and to what extent they both help and hinder the pursuit of historical knowledge.…

    • 1710 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays