Analysing Observation in Social Work

Topics: Sociology, Family, Social work Pages: 50 (10477 words) Published: April 11, 2011
Contents Page

1. Family Details 3
2. Observation Analysis4
3. Life Span Development 7
4. Sociology10
5. Social Policy13
6. References16
7. Appendices21
i) Recording Observation21
ii) Community Profile28
iii) Consent form45

Family Details

This observation is based on a family consisting of a young professional married couple and their three year old daughter. I observed them for one hour over three weeks, in the evening to fit into their schedules. They have lived in the borough of Croydon in their three bedroom house for six years. For the purpose of this assignment all the names have been changed and the family have given their consent to the observations.

(Sonia Morris) Mum – teacher for a local primary school, original from Leeds

(Paige Morris) Toddler – 3 years old girl, she goes to the local nursery attached to the school Sonia works in.

(Lewis Morris) Father – ICT consultant

Genogram

Observation Analysis

Using observational methods are helpful in describing individual’s behaviour as they interact in real time; and allow the reader to create a verbal picture of the behaviours as they unfold. This is important when social workers are working with children and families in their home (Pellegrini, 1996:1), and there is a growing recognition in social work literature around observation in practice (Riche & Tanner, 1998:17). On my first observation I was not nervous but did feel intrusive about entering the Morris’s home, I had meet them a few days before and they were very welcoming which eased some of the anxieties I had. I know that as a qualified social worker on some occasions (e.g. child protection) I will be meeting the family for the first time when conducting a home visit and they might not be welcoming. Taking the role of observer is what I was most apprehensive about, I was unsure of what to expect on the observation. Tanner (1999:24) and McMahon & Farnfield (1994:83-84) state that the feeling of being in the role of observer may feel stranger, having ownership of your role is vital and the pressure to modify or act outside the role are various and powerful. Reflecting back on my observation I was unsure of my role and did not know what to expect, but after the first observation I felt more comfortable. For example in the first observation (Appendix 1) I felt awkward sometimes recording what I was observing especially when Paige did something naughty and was being told off. I feel that the parents were aware that I was recording everything, I wonder now that if I had not recorded while observing them but waited until I had got home would they have acted differently.

Publications on observation examine how ethical issues like observation bias, preconceived ideas, cultural bias etc. can affect observations. Pellegrini (1996:34) defines observation bias as ‘the expectations and knowledge observers have about participants that may influence the objectivity of their observations per se or the ways in which they treat participants and data derived from observations.’ Reflecting back on my experience I did not have any knowledge of the family so I did not feel I had observation bias, although I was impressed by what I observed of the family and how they interact with each other by the end of all three observations. This could mean that if I was conducted a similar observation again, I would have observation bias based on my experiences of the Morris family. Hobart & Frankel (1999:5) argued preconceived ideas can influence what you record; I feel that I had preconceived ideas of the family. They were that they may not act natural around me and put on a ‘show’ when I was doing the observation, and this did stay in my mind in the first two observations, Ferguson (2009) highlight this in his study. However, whether they did I will never know but I do feel by...

References: Adams, R. (2002). ‘Social Policy or Social Work.’ Hampshire: Palgrave.
Barrett, M. (1980). ‘Women’s Oppression Today: Problems of Marxist-Feminist Analysis.’ London: New Left Books.
Barrett, M. & McIntosh, M. (1982). ‘The Anti-social family.’ London: NLB.
Bee, H. & Boyd, D. (2007). ‘The Developing Child.’ Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Berk, L.E. (2010). ‘Development Through the Lifespan. ' Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Bilton, T.; Bonnett, K.; Jones, P.; Lawson, T.; Skinner, D.; Stanworth, M. & Webster, A. (2002). ‘Introductory Sociology.’ New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Boyd, D. & Bee, H. (2009). ‘Lifespan Development.’ Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
Brewer, M.; Crawford, C. & Dearden, L. (2005). ‘Reforms to Childcare Policy.’ [Online]. Available at http://www.ifs.org.uk/budgets/gb2005/05chap9.pdf. (Accessed 13th February 2011).
Briggs, S. (1992) 'Child observation and social work training ', Journal of Social Work Practice, 6(1), 49-61.
Briggs, S. (1995). ‘From Subjectivity to Realism: Child Observation and Social Work,’ in Yelloly, M. & Henkel, M. ‘Learning and Teaching in Social Work. Towards Reflective Practice.’ London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Crawford, K. & Walker, J. (2003). ‘Social Work and Human Development.’ Exeter: Learning Matters.
Cunningham, J. & Cunningham, S. (2008). ‘Sociology and Social Work.’ Exeter: Learning Matters.
Denney, D. (1998). ‘Social Policy and Social Work.’ Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Directgov. (2009a). ‘Child Trust Fund.’ [Online]. Crown Copyright. (Last updated 9th November 2009) Available at http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/ManagingMoney/SavingsAndInvestments/DG_10018527. (Accessed on 19th February 2011).
Erskine, J. (2008). ‘Croydon Childcare Sufficiency Assessment Parents’ childcare research analysis’. Croydon Council.
Engels, F. (1968). ‘The Origins of the Family, Private Property and the State.’ Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Family and Parenting Institute. (2010). ‘Family Policy and the New Government.’ [Online]. Available at http://www.familyandparenting.org/Filestore//Documents/PolicyDiscussionPapers/conference_rep_2010_final.pdf. (Accessed on 19th February 2011).
Ferguson, H (2009). ‘Performing Child Protection: Home visiting, Movement and the Struggle to Reach the Abused Child,’ Child & Family Social Work, 14, 471-480.
Finch, N (2003) ‘Family Policy in the UK.’ Social Policy Research Unit, York. [Online] Available at http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/spru/research/nordic/ukpolicy.pdf. (Accessed on 13th February 2011).
Friedan, B. (1963). ‘The Feminist Mystique.’ New York: Dell. In Cunningham, J. & Cunningham, S. (2008). ‘Sociology and Social Work.’ Exeter: Learning Matters.
Harrington, A. (2005). ‘Modern Social Theory: An Introduction.’ New York: Oxford University Press.
Hirsh – Pasek, K.; Golinkoff, R.M.; Berk, L.E. & Singer, D.G. (2009). ‘A mandate for playful learning in Preschool: Presenting the evidence.’ New York: Oxford University Press.
Hobart, C. & Frankel, J. (1999). ‘A Practical Guide to Child Observation and Assessment.’ United Kingdom: Stanley Thornes (Publishers) Ltd.
Kirby, J. (2005). ‘The Price of Parenthood.’ London: Centre for Policy Studies.
LeFrançois, G.R . (1999). ‘The Lifespan.’ USA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
McMahon, S. & Farnfield, S. (1994). 'Infant and child observation as preparation for social work practice ', Social Work Education, 13 (3), 81-98.
Miller, P. H. (2001). ‘Theories of Developmental Psychology.’ New York: Worth.
Moll, I. (1994). ‘Reclaiming the Natural Line in Vygotsky’s Theory of Cognitive Development,’ Human Development , 37, 333-342.
Murdoch, P. (1949). ‘Social Structure.’ New York: Macmillan.
Office for National Statistics. (2008). ‘Neighbourhood Statistics.’ [Online] Available at http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/Info.do?page=Neighbourhood.htm (Accessed on 4th December 2010).
O’Neill, R. (2005). ‘Fiscal Policy and the Family how the Family Fares in France, Germany and the UK.’ [Online]. Available at http://www.civitas.org.uk/pdf/OneillFiscalPolicy.pdf. (Accessed on 19th February 2011).
Pellegrini, A.D.(1996). ‘Observing Children in their Natural Worlds. A Methodological Primer.’ New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Parten, M. (1932). ‘Social Participation among Preschool Children,’ Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 27, 243-269.
Piaget, J. (1954). ‘The Construction of Reality in the Child.’ New York: International Universities Press.
Piaget, J. (1962). ‘Play, Dreams and Imitation.’ New York: W.W Norton.
Rayner, E.; Joyce, A.; Rose, J.; Twyman, m. & Clulow, C. (2005). ‘Human Development: An Introduction to the Psychodynamics of Growth, Maturity and Ageing.’ East Sussex: Routledge.
Riche, P.L. & Tanner, K. (1998). ‘Observation and its Application to Social Work: rather like breathing.’ London: J Kingsley.
Rogoff, B. (2003). ‘The Cultural Nature of Human Development.’ New York: Oxford University Press.
Rubin, K.; Bukowski, W. & Parker, J. (1998). ‘Peer Interactions, relationship and groups. Handbook of Child Psychology.’ New York: Wiley.
Sheridan, M.D. (1997). ‘Spontaneous Play in Early Childhood from birth to six years.’ England: NFER Publishing Company.
Sigelman, C.K. & Rider, E.A. (2006). ‘Life Span Human Development.’ USA: Thomson Higher Education.S
Singer, J
Santrock, J. W. (2008). ‘Life-Span Development.’ New York: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
Waldfogel, J. & Washbrook, E. (2008). ‘Early Years Policy.’ 1st – 3rd June. [Online]. Available at http://www.bristol.ac.uk/ifssoca/outputs/waldfogeleyp.pdf. (Accessed on 13th February 2011).
Wilson, Kate(1992) 'The place of child observation in social work training ', Journal of Social Work Practice, 6: 1, 37-47.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay on Social Work
  • social work Essay
  • social work Essay
  • Swami Vivekananda as a contributor in Social Work Essay
  • Domestic Violence & Social Work Essay
  • Social Work Essay
  • communication and social work Essay
  • FUTURE OF SOCIAL WORK Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free