Bibliography: • Canada, Environment. "Energy and The Canadian Economy." Economic Scan of Canada’s Energy Sector 1 (2008): 22.Environment Canada. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. Edmonton Sun. "B.C. 's environmentalists are cool to the Northern Gateway, but the province 's gas and mineral industries are booming." Edmonton Sun. N.p., 28 Sept. 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. . "Enbridge defends ad campaign on pipeline safety - Calgary - CBC News."CBC.ca - Canadian News Sports Entertainment Kids Docs Radio TV. N.p., 9 Aug. 2012. Web. 20 Oct. 2012. . Enbridge. "Benefits for Canadians - Northern Gateway." Enbridge Northern Gateway Project - Northern Gateway. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. . Ipsos. "Views on Canadian Oil and Gas."Ipsos North America. N.p., 3 May 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. . Lee, Marc . "The Economic Cost and Benefits of the Proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline." Enbridge Pipe Dream and Nightmares 1 (2012): 26.www.policyalternatives.ca. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. Mallinder, Lorraine. "Viewpoint: Canada 's green image tarnished by new policies." BBC News. N.p., 15 May 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. .…
This week for PLN I read Dakota Access Pipeline: What's at stake? by Holly Yang. Why this topic is blowing up is because where Native American tribes live the government approved a pipeline to be built and where the pipeline is going to be constructed invades the native American's land. Some background of the Dakota Pipeline is it is a 1,172-mile pipeline would stretch from the oil-rich Bakken Formation to the southeast into South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois. The Army Corps of Engineers approved the project then Standing Rock Sioux tribe sued the Corps because it would threaten the tribe environmentally and economically. Some people are arguing that they need the pipeline because it will be an economic boom but on the other hand, people are…
The Keystone XL proposal faces criticism from environmentalists and a minority of the members of the United States Congress. In January 2012, President Barack Obama rejected the application amid protests about the pipeline 's impact on Nebraska 's environmentally sensitive Sand Hills region. TransCanada Corporation…
The Keystone Pipeline, also known as Keystone XL, is a 1,179-mile-long pipeline from oil fields in Western Canada to the Midwestern United States. Specifically, this pipeline will extend from Alberta, Canada to Steele City, Nebraska with plans to link to an existing pipeline that reaches to the Gulf Coast. Despite the advantages this pipeline will produce, it will also create various negative effects regarding wildlife and inhabitants of these areas, economic and political issues, as well as challenge government policies and regulations.…
One recent autumn evening while I stood in line to comment at a public hearing about a proposed natural gas pipeline through Virginia, I befriended an inspirational environmental advocate by the name of Bear Redstar. Bear grew up in a Lakota family as a part of the Dakotas’ seven Sioux tribes. Bear’s initial exposure to the destructive potential of a pipeline occurred while he worked as a welder for ExxonMobil on the Trans-Alaska Pipeline, where he witnessed the steel pipe rupture and release crude oil into the environment. Upon his return home, he advocated alongside Native American community members against the Dakota Access Pipeline. A few months ago Mr. Redstar, moved to Roanoke, Virginia, again facing the trouble of a pipeline. He and I were at the public hearing to warn the Appalachian community of the risks associated with a pipeline.…
The Trans Mountain pipeline expansion is branded as a project that is going to increase revenues to 73.5 Billion dollars, employment, tax benefits, and return any farmland or wetland they disturb back to it’s place (Trans Mountain, 2014). Though, Trans Mountain is persuasive as to how the pipeline will protect the environment and indigenous people, and how the pipeline increases revenues. The company fails to mention the environmental damage that will be done when this pipeline is built, and the cost required to rectify the pollution. It fails to mention the how the loss of farmland and wetlands will affect the Canadian environment, the depletion of non-renewable energy sources. Overall, the pipeline will negatively affect all aspects of life…
The construction of the Keystone Xl pipeline will be detrimental to the environment because it will disperse greenhouse gases into the atmosphere from the extraction of tar sand. The tar sands oil production has higher levels of carbon dioxide emissions than that of conventional oil. Burning the tar sand oil will increase the earth temperature, resulting in powerful storms such as hurricanes and tornadoes. This kind of pollution will have detrimental effects on our eco system, from potential oil spill or even worse a catastrophic explosion. The release of harmful toxins into earth environment can increase health risks for nature’s inhabitants.…
Imagine a forest with unnatural beauty: green trees, a wide variety of wildlife, clean water from streams, and the sound of migrating birds flying overhead. Now imagine that same exact forest with tar sands oil running through it: wilting trees, bone-thin wildlife suffocating from the fumes, and streams covered in brown and black oil. Jonathan Waldman, an environmental journalist at the University of Colorado, published an article that argued that the Keystone XL pipeline should be built because it is the safest way to move tar sands oil, does not affect the environment and climate, and creates effective jobs. However, that is not the case. The Keystone XL Pipeline is actually a dangerous way to move oil from Point A to Point B, affects the environment negatively, and does not create effective jobs.…
The relationship between the Amerindians and the United States have been one of turmoil, war, and neglect. Treaties have been broken, lives have been lost, and genocidal acts have occurred. Presidents have forcefully removed Amerindians from place to place until they were forced onto reservations. Culture has been destroyed and religious artifacts decimated to create metropolises. But is the Dakota Access Pipeline another hit to the Amerindians? The purpose of this essay is to explain how the Dakota Access Pipeline is not only a finical benefit to the United States but the environmentally savvy one.…
The Government wants to build on Indians reservations. The pipe line would run through a sacred burial ground. Also, it would run under a lake the tribe considers a crucial water source for them. The Dakota Access pipeline is a $3.7 billion project that would carry 470,000 barrels of oil a day from the oil fields of western North Dakota to Illinois, where it would be linked with other pipelines. The plaintiffs claim the tribe was not properly consulted before the US Army Corps of Engineers approved the pipeline project.…
The North Dakota Access Pipeline has been a major topic for national controversy for almost year now. It has sparked a major disagreement between Native Americans and the Government. Is this perhaps another treaty that has been broken? The North Dakota Access Pipeline is a $3.7 billion project constructed by the Texas-Based Energy Transfer Partners. Ir. Although it is said to be the safest and most efficient way to transport crude oil many Native Americans still have many concerns regarding the project and the environment. Granting that the North Dakota Access Pipeline may hold potential benefits such as jobs, resources and revenue; the apparent possibility of land invasion, oil spills/leaks, and environmental impact still outweigh the bad.…
Have you ever wondered how powerful a bunch of people are when they all agree on one thing? Native Americans all around the world continued to camp out near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation in North Dakota during the cold weather. Citizens of the Standing Rock Sioux and other Natives and even people against the pipeline “set up the Sacred Stone Camp in April to protest the Dakota Access Pipeline” (Halpert). The Main problem with the Dakota Access Pipeline is that it has a very high risk of water contamination, and it would threaten nearby sacred burial sites…
If the Keystone XL pipeline is built, thousands of creatures may relocate or die because of it. The Keystone pipeline is a real pipeline that will transport thousands of gallons of crude tar sands oil a day from Canada to the southern United States. It may leak and cause the environment to be hurt. Many people believe that it will benefit the United States and Canada in many ways, but many people believe the other side of it and think it should not be built because of the risks. It has many benefits, but there is too much of a risk involved in the building of the keystone pipeline. The pipeline should not be built because it is bad for the environment, bad for the economy, and may go through native lands.…
Keystone Pipeline could be the most heated topic of this decade in American politics. The…
It is not easy question regarding whether America should attempt to drill its way out of dependency on foreign oil or to push hard for alternative energies. Many considerations need to be examined; environmental concerns including global warming, employment, big business, and monetary issues including the trade balance, foreign policy, and special interest groups.…