Preview

Argument Against The Dakota Access Pipeline

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
302 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argument Against The Dakota Access Pipeline
Have you ever wondered how powerful a bunch of people are when they all agree on one thing? Native Americans all around the world continued to camp out near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation in North Dakota during the cold weather. Citizens of the Standing Rock Sioux and other Natives and even people against the pipeline “set up the Sacred Stone Camp in April to protest the Dakota Access Pipeline” (Halpert). The Main problem with the Dakota Access Pipeline is that it has a very high risk of water contamination, and it would threaten nearby sacred burial sites
Can you imagine being from the same race as the founders and makers of a country and then being treated in a very inappropriate manner. Not only did the American government push them
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dakota Pipeline Case Study
    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dakota Pipeline Case Study

    This week for PLN I read Dakota Access Pipeline: What's at stake? by Holly Yang. Why this topic is blowing up is because where Native American tribes live the government approved a pipeline to be built and where the pipeline is going to be constructed invades the native American's land. Some background of the Dakota Pipeline is it is a 1,172-mile pipeline would stretch from the oil-rich Bakken Formation to the southeast into South Dakota, Iowa, and Illinois. The Army Corps of Engineers approved the project then Standing Rock Sioux tribe sued the Corps because it would threaten the tribe environmentally and economically. Some people are arguing that they need the pipeline because it will be an economic boom but on the other hand, people are…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Keystone Pipeline Pros And Cons
    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Keystone Pipeline Pros And Cons

    The Keystone Pipeline, also known as Keystone XL, is a 1,179-mile-long pipeline from oil fields in Western Canada to the Midwestern United States. Specifically, this pipeline will extend from Alberta, Canada to Steele City, Nebraska with plans to link to an existing pipeline that reaches to the Gulf Coast. Despite the advantages this pipeline will produce, it will also create various negative effects regarding wildlife and inhabitants of these areas, economic and political issues, as well as challenge government policies and regulations.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bear Pipeline Case Study
    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page

    Bear Pipeline Case Study

    One recent autumn evening while I stood in line to comment at a public hearing about a proposed natural gas pipeline through Virginia, I befriended an inspirational environmental advocate by the name of Bear Redstar. Bear grew up in a Lakota family as a part of the Dakotas’ seven Sioux tribes. Bear’s initial exposure to the destructive potential of a pipeline occurred while he worked as a welder for ExxonMobil on the Trans-Alaska Pipeline, where he witnessed the steel pipe rupture and release crude oil into the environment. Upon his return home, he advocated alongside Native American community members against the Dakota Access Pipeline. A few months ago Mr. Redstar, moved to Roanoke, Virginia, again facing the trouble of a pipeline. He and I were at the public hearing to warn the Appalachian community of the risks associated with a pipeline.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dakota Access Pipeline Case Study
    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dakota Access Pipeline Case Study

    The United States government possesses a long history of double-crossing Native Americans. The most recent event is the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline currently being protested by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and their supporters. Though the pipeline is more than halfway completed, protestor's have held their ground since April of 2016, and show no sign of losing momentum. The tribe argues construction of the pipeline has already bulldozed into the sacred burial grounds of their ancestors, and further digging will result in irreparable damage to historical, religious and cultural sites. Along with the possible contamination of the Missouri River in case of a leak or oil spill. Followed by The Army Corp of Engineers, responsible of approving the final permits for the pipeline, failing to properly consult with the tribe beforehand. The pipeline has been momentarily halted, while…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Dakota Access Pipeline
    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Dakota Access Pipeline

    There should never have been a problem with the Dakota Access Pipeline, and it should be built. The pipeline has many benefits, and few, if any, actual problems. Nodaplsolidarity.org, a site dedicated to opposing and protesting the pipeline, avoids the issue of what the problems with it actually are, saying that the pipeline is a violation of the United Nation’s Declaration of Universal Human Rights, and a violation of the United Nation’s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, without actually naming what it is about the pipeline that violates these declarations. Since there appear to be no actual issues violated (and they are declarations of the United Nations, not the United States) these problems can be dismissed, leaving us with…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dakota Access Pipeline Case
    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dakota Access Pipeline Case

    The government should not come in contact with property that does not belong to them unless consent is given by the owner. In the case of Standing Rock, the government was never given permission to construct the oil pipeline in their Indian Reservation territory. The government should not be allowed to construct the pipeline in Indian Reservation territory because first of all that property is not theirs is the Sioux’s Tribe property. Second of all, the oil pipeline is going to produce many complications for the environment and the community around it. Third and final of all this is going to give America a bad image.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dakota Access Pipeline Research Paper
    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Dakota Access Pipeline Research Paper

    The relationship between the Amerindians and the United States have been one of turmoil, war, and neglect. Treaties have been broken, lives have been lost, and genocidal acts have occurred. Presidents have forcefully removed Amerindians from place to place until they were forced onto reservations. Culture has been destroyed and religious artifacts decimated to create metropolises. But is the Dakota Access Pipeline another hit to the Amerindians? The purpose of this essay is to explain how the Dakota Access Pipeline is not only a finical benefit to the United States but the environmentally savvy one.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Dakota Access Pipeline
    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Dakota Access Pipeline

    What would you do if the government denied your rights, threatened to harm your land, and threatened your primary source of water? Would you let them get away with it, or would you fight for what is right? The Dakota Access Pipeline is said to be “the safest and most environmentally sensitive way to transport crude oil from domestic wells to American consumers” (Dakota Access Pipeline Facts). It’s a pipeline that was built under Lake Oahe, which is located upstream of the Sioux tribes’ land. It would also would save a lot of money and energy to transfer oil across the nation. The Dakota Access Pipeline should have been stopped because the Sioux tribes have rights, the pipeline could damage the environment, and the government needs to care…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Dakota Pipeline Analysis
    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Dakota Pipeline Analysis

    The United States is based on the ideal image of increasing job opportunities, and becoming more energy independent regardless of the consequences that come along with it. The Dakota Pipeline was first announced to the people on January 25, 2014. During the making, the pipeline was denied final permits to finish the project by former president, Barack Obama. Recently it has been brought to surface by president-elect, Donald Trump. This pipeline will allow about 800 million gallons of crude oil to pass underground across four states in America every day. It will disrupt Native lands in the process, will run across river streams and worsen climate change. This pipeline explores Thoreau’s concept of limited government, non-violent protest and…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Hydraulic Fracking
    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments Against Hydraulic Fracking

    The modern environmental justice movement began in the mid- 20th century, when the country realized that the environment needed help. This movement throughout the last several decades has evolved from protecting woodland areas from deforestation to protection against the gas industry. Hydraulic fracturing is the process by which natural gas is extracted from the earth’s shales. The process begins with drilling through several layers of the earth, like the freshwater aquifer. Next, water with “fracking fluid” is injected into the drilled area to crack the shale. This water comes back up to the surface and is put into a pit to evaporate. The natural gas flows up, and is then stored. The process is simple enough, but so are the consequences. Hydraulic fracturing has detrimental environmental consequences and should be banned.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Preventing Native American Pipeline
    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    Argumentative Essay: Preventing Native American Pipeline

    There are many ways you could help prevent the Native American Pipeline. In my opinion the biggest way to prevent the Pipeline is to not let it happen. If Donald Trump lets them build the pipeline there could be many people could lose their water supplies. If this happens it will affect many native americans. Donald trump could alway talk to the tribe leader and they could come to a conclusion. The police are doing horrible things to the Native Americans they are beating them and just being darn right mean to the Native Americans. They could always come to a deal. The government could always buy out the tribe so they could build the pipeline. They could build it in a different place and prevent contaminating the water. The Indians are not…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fracking Argument Analysis
    • 137 Words
    • 1 Page

    Fracking Argument Analysis

    I agree Mr. Murdoch's opening statement against political correctness and his assertion that America is an influential force for the "vindication of human values". However, I am disagree with his viewpoint on fracking. Although I can see the merit in his view that fracking will allow a great many people to benefit economically from it, he never mentions the environmental implications of it. I think that the importance of the preservation of the environment while we still can merits restrictions on the use of fracking. It's an environmentally unsound technique that is wasteful and unsustainable. Additionally, it also presents safety and health hazards to those who live near fracturing sites. I agree that we should strive to minimize both intellectual…

    • 137 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argument Against Fracking
    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Argument Against Fracking

    Hydraulic fracturing (also known as fracking), a way of obtaining natural gas that is used today, may cause cancer and may speed up global warming’s. Fracking injects a mix of water, "chemicals, sand, and other materials into layers of shale, a type of rock" (Source 1). The injection flows down a pipe that is going through the shale. To obtain the natural gas, the pressure in the pipe causes the rock around the pipe to crack, allowing natural gas to escape. Then, the gas flows up the well and is collected. However, Hydraulic fracturing should be put to a stop, because of health concerns, and the effect fracking may have on global warming’s.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fracking Argumentative Essay
    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Fracking Argumentative Essay

    I dare you to make it throughout the day without touching a product associated with oil. Shifting our reliance on foreign fossil fuels to local energy sources in the United States poses many benefits. The oil and gas industry is one of the biggest industries in the United States. Fracking is the process of injecting water, sand and small amounts of chemicals into the ground, causing shale to crack, releasing natural gas. We don’t have a choice; we depend on fossil fuels every day to survive.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fracking Persuasive Essay
    • 2278 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Fracking Persuasive Essay

    On every fracking site, 8 million gallons of water and 40,000 gallons of chemicals are used each day. In addition, these chemicals are injected 10,000 feet into the ground. This interesting statistic calls attention to the dangers of contamination and pollution that fracking brings to local communities and residents. A PhD recipient from Duke University, Dr.Richard Anderson, claims that the federal government needs to have certain limitations on national fracking protocol. Otherwise, he argues greater environmental issues with the oil and gas industries may arise. Many recent articles and research have agreed with Dr. Anderson in the conclusion that water contamination and greater health risks may occur if the government does not provide a solution. The Texas legislature should ban or minimize fracking in specific areas of Texas, which includes Forth Worth where there are 12,000 fracking wells. The reasons are because fracking causes contamination in groundwater and the atmosphere, uses chemicals that are unsafe and toxic, causes health risks to many residents, and causes earthquakes.…

    • 2278 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics