Preview

72459298 BF322 Arundel

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1426 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
72459298 BF322 Arundel
BF322: Advanced Corporate Finance
Case Study – Arundel Partners: The Sequel Project

Group Members:
Chen Yanheng
Loon Shu Juan Melissa
Ong Joseline
Tan Hui Kiow

Fundamental Analysis
Arundel Partners is an investment group, set up to purchase sequel rights associated with films produced by one or more major U.S. major studios. By owning such rights, Arundel will be able to wait and see if the movie was successful, before deciding whether to exercise its right and produce a second film based on the story or character of the first.
However, Arundel’s profit margin would depend on how much it has to pay to purchase such a portfolio of sequel rights, and this problem would be analyzed in our report.
1. Why do the principals of Arundel Partners think they can make money buying movie sequel rights? Why do the partners want to buy a portfolio of rights in advance rather than negotiating film-by-film to buy them?
The principals of Arundel believe that they can make money with the purchase of the movie sequel rights due to the volatility associated with a movie’s success. Such volatility is precious in an option and therefore, the principals think that they can make use of such unpredictability in the movie industry to their advantage. Furthermore, the principals have the right not to exercise the option if the movie was not successful, and therefore not produce any sequel. Therefore, the loss associated with such a movie with bad response from the public would be limited to the premiums paid by Arundel for the option. However, the gain on the upside can be unbounded and this provides Arundel with the opportunity to make money. Furthermore, Arundel can also sell the rights to the highest bidder if it does not want to produce the sequel itself. This is also another method where Arundel can make money with the purchase of the rights.
It is of critical importance that Arundel buy the portfolio of rights in advance rather than negotiating film-by-film

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The partnership will use all of these assets in its business. Subsequent to forming the partnership, J&J…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    1 This section deals with increase money supply given two scenarios (see “a” and “b” below).…

    • 954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cleary, Wasser, and Nolan formed a partnership on January 1, 2012, with investments of $100,000, $150,000, and $200,000, respectively. For division of income, they agreed to (1) interest of 10% of the beginning capital balance each year, (2) annual compensation of $10,000 to Wasser, and (3) sharing the remainder of the income or loss in a ratio of 20% for Cleary, and 40% each for Wasser and Nolan. Net income was $150,000 in 2012 and $180,000 in 2013. Each partner withdrew $1,000 for personal use every month during 2012 and 2013.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    lit1 task 3

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    PROFIT RETENTION- The partnership has the ability to decide how the profits are allocated amongst each partner.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    $2 million that producers would require in order to give up the rights to sequels (see case…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To estimate the per-film value of a portfolio of sequel rights we used the event tree method. Therefore we applied Bayes’ theorem. First we calculated the probability of a successful movie, meaning a one-year return greater then zero. This amounts to 47,47%. Subsequently the probability of a successful hypothetical sequel, meaning a one-year return is greater then zero, is 28,28%. Then we estimated…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2511 M W15 MD 01 02 14

    • 3673 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Prerequisite: AP/ADMS 1000 3.00. Course credit exclusions: None. PRIOR TO FALL 2009: Prerequisite: AK/ADMS 1000 3.00. Course credit exclusions: AK/ADMS 2511 3.00, AK/ADMS 3511 3.00 (prior to Summer 2005).…

    • 3673 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    task 1 proprietorship

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages

    multiple owners. An advantage of a general partnership is that there aren t any stockholders to…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a movie is produced, distributed, and shown in theatres, the movie studio gains more and more knowledge about the movie, which allows them to predict how well the movie will perform financially. This would create an advantage for the movie company if negotiating with Arundel after production began or a movie was released, especially because Arundel would not have most of this information. If Arundel waited to purchase the sequel rights until t=1, they would be spending significantly more on the…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are only three studios that Arundel would make a profit out of their sequel right which are Sony Pictures Entertainment, Warner Brothers and The Walt Disney Company as you can see in table 2. There are only six films that Arundel would make a profit if he exercises their options as you can see in table 1. I suggest that Arundel starts the negation of the sequel right in value between $1-$2 million and don’t exceed the maximum the call option price for the individual studio since they need. Moreover, I suggest the studio have rights for subsequent sequels in order to keep the studio committed to the success of possible sequels.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Q5) “Tough times demand tough decisions.” As the CEO of Williams, would you recommend accepting the proposed $900 million financing offer? If not, what alternatives would you pursue?…

    • 2088 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Berkshire partners believes in creating values “based on successful relationships, hard work, analysis, and the open decision making of all individuals” (Partners) They do not see the acquiring company as just a financial investment but as an investment in a relationship between two living entities. They work hard in collaboration with the acquired firm to do the analysis and research and consult all individuals in both firms regarding the future of the company. They focus on quality over quantity and tend to have a smaller set of deals they think will be successful and devote their resources to conduct in-depth analysis to uncover all necessary information and thorough due diligence for each deal. At times when they feel their team could do with some assistance, they bring in industry experts to help with the decision making process. Despite these detailed steps, the ultimate decision lies with the entire firm.…

    • 2246 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital Budgeting

    • 2183 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Berk, J, & DeMarzo, P. (2010). Corporate finance: the core: 2010 custom edition. Boston: Pearson Education.…

    • 2183 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Letter of Advice

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    However, when considering the security of a partnership, the disadvantages raise concerns about how safe an option a partnership is;…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aberlyn Capital

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The venture leasing deal that Aberlyn proposed to RhoMed is an innovative way for RhoMed, a start-up firm, to acquire financing without diluting its equity value and raising debt in the market. Management believes that the firm is more valuable than venture capital firms would believe, and debt financing would be extremely costly since RhoMed doesn’t currently have positive cash flow. For Aberlyn, the main benefits of the transaction are the interest payments paid on the lease and potential to sell the patent for a much higher value than the original $1 Million valuation by RhoMed. However, this is a rather risky investment for Aberlyn. If RhoMed defaults on its payments, Aberlyn uses the patent as collateral and must sell it in the market. Since the patent is highly individualized and therefore may not be commercially feasible, the patent is probably worth less than what Lulu’s valuation suggests.…

    • 2570 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays