Preview

1914 States Went To War Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1218 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1914 States Went To War Essay
How valid is the claim that in 1914 states went to war due to fear rather then motives of gain?Austria 's quarrel, Germany 's warOne of the theories about the outbreak of the First World War is that nations went to war not to necessarily gain something but mainly because of fear which caused by many different factors.

Europe before the war can be compared to a round-about with the countries involved, Germany being the central pole, speeding up and thus causing the nations into uncontrollable chaos resulting in them breaking off.

The basis of the alliance systems started forming as early as 1871. France and Russia had been supportive of each other ever since France lent Russia money to start industrialization during the reign of Alexander II. The bond between these two great powers was strengthened by their shared enemies, the Central
…show more content…
As and addition to this served the image of barbaric hordes from the steppes of Asia, charging the civilized central Europe. This visceral fear and the fact that with the population of 166 million people, Russia had practically unlimited human power reserves (and would be therefore practically undefeatable if there were an adequate amount of equipment) made Russia itself the biggest fear of the Central Powers, as proved by the Schlieffen plan, which stated that it was necessary to focus on Russia after quickly defeating France.

"We cannot compete with the Russian masses." Von MoltkeA perfect example of the fact that nations went to war mostly because of fear and not gain is first war declaration. This was caused by the Russian mobilization, which was a reaction to German aggression towards Prussia. Russia, however, was for now not going to precede any further then a mobilization. But fear and confusion led the Germans into the certainty that Russia is about to attack. German mobilization was then the obvious next step, and The Great War was about to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Euro: Mchapter 26 Outline

    • 8194 Words
    • 33 Pages

    * France built a network of alliances in eastern Europe with Poland and the members if the so-called Little Entente (Czechoslovakia, Romania, Yugoslavia)…

    • 8194 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WW1 DBQ

    • 354 Words
    • 1 Page

    C). This alarmed the largest countries and due to the fact that they possessed a prepared force…

    • 354 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modern History Notes

    • 6746 Words
    • 27 Pages

    The Schlieffen Plan; was the German strategic plan that was to be put into action if there was war against both France and Russia simultaneously.…

    • 6746 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In response to Russian Empire’s and Austria-Hungary’s declaration of war against each other after the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand of Austria, Germany declared war on Russia on August 1, 1914. Three days later, the German Reichstag declared Burgfrieden or “civil peace” which declared for people to set aside their conflicts aside and unite to defend the country. Most Germans expecting a rapid victory, enthusiastically supported the war. Their views, however, shifted from ebullience to one of detest. Opinions toward war all varied to each person. Some supported the war through the end, while some changed their view and wanted the war to end. In another perspective, some saw the war as an economic opportunity.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Source 1 partially agrees with this opinion, stating that ‘The German army and the government pushed for war before 1914’. This argues that the leaders of Germany and other important figures wanted war even before 1914, suggesting that plans and decisions made pre-1914 were made with the outbreak of a war in mind. Fischer’s argument of the War Council of December 1912 supports source 1 and shows that German leaders were discussing the prospect of war before 1914, and that the decisions made in that meeting such as the support of Austria-Hungary against Serbia caused the outbreak of war as it created sides, alliances and further tension in an already tense environment. Equally, the creation of the Schlieffen plan in 1905 to win the war in the West in six weeks shows how Germany were making decisions about war almost ten years before it happened, so were well aware of their decisions causing the outbreak of war.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great War Dbq Essay

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Soldiers’ view of the Great War altered dramatically as it progressed. During the early years, there was a great sense of patriotic enthusiasm. Many believed in the romantic concept of an honorable death, which could be attained by dying for one’s country. Charles Peguy illustrates this idea in evidence source 2. He asserts that those who die in great battles for their country are blessed. Although Peguy does not directly state the word country, he implies it with “a plot of ground,” “carnal cities,” and “their hearth and their fire.” Such phrases can be associated with the notion of home and this home can then be further connected to the country. The idealized concept of an honorable death in war, however, faded away in the later years of World War I as a grim reality set in. Instead, Wilfred Owen demonstrates how the “Dulce et decorum est/Pro patria mori” (It is sweet and fitting to die for one’s country) saying is actually a lie in source 8. He does so by describing a soldier’s gruesome death from gas poisoning. The agony that the solider had gone through, such as “white eyes writhing in his…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Europe was to a great extent a ‘powder keg’ ready to explode prior to 1914. Despite conflicting views on the causes of World War 1, the outbreak of this War was not inevitable, nor was it the result of one key event. However, it was more a product of rising tensions, rivalry and fear within Europe, which dated back primarily to the 18th and 19th centuries. Emerging new ideologies and the development of new technologies facilitated change in the structure of European societies. As a result, European powers felt the need to exert their dominance and control through military expansion, and aggressive nationalism. The ethnocentric attitudes prevailing at this time lead to a desire of many nations to expand their empires and colonies to new areas. All of this led to the development of complex alliance systems, governed by diplomacy and strategy. Due to such, the reflection that Europe was a powder keg ready to explode in 1914, is significantly valid. As it encapsulates and reflects the rising tensions amongst powers at that time, and the mutual mistrust and resentment between them.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ww1 M.A.I.N Causes

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Europe was faced with four major crises between 1905 and 1913 . Two between France and Germany over Morocco and two between Austria - Hungary over the Balkans, but each time neither side felt strong enough to risk war . By 1914 the situation had changed when a fresh crisis emerged in the Balkans , now neither side was prepared to back down. , each convinced they could win.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ww1 Essay

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The cause of all this havoc was the rivalries between nations in Europe that sparked the war. The tension between countries was matched by tension within countries. Especially in southeastern Europe, in an area known as the Balkans. Ethnic groups revolted as Austria-Hungary and Russia stood by. The region was a “powder keg”…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great War Causes

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Initially, these alliance systems were intended to preserve peace in Europe; on the contrary, it drove them into world war. These alliance systems developed their roots when Prussia’s chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, claimed Germany to be a peaceful power, even though he assumed France wanted revenge for its defeat in the Franco-Prussian war. Thus, Beck states that “in 1879, Bismarck formed the Dual Alliance between Germany and Austria-Hungary; three years later, Italy joined the two countries, forming the Triple Alliance.” During the same year, to ensure that France did not make an alliance with Russia, Bismarck immediately formed an alliance with Russia. Nonetheless, under the reign of Germany’s new leader Kaiser Wilhelm II, Germany’s treaty with Russia broke and Russia later formed a defensive military alliance with France in 1892 and 1894. Although outraged by this alliance, Wilhelm II focused on starting a shipbuilding project in order to make the German navy identical to the famous British fleet. Based on the distrust of attack, Britain formed an alliance with France and Russia, named the Triple Entente. These alliances faced off at the Austria-Hungarian and Siberian assassination conflict. Even though Germany did not give support to its ally Austria-Hungary, Tsar Nicholas ordered…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many historians, such as Martel, believe that it was the attitudes and views of the time that would make the outbreak of war in 1914 inevitable. The fact that everybody at the time thought that were superior to everybody else led to confidence on a national level. Everyone expected to win any future war, and war was seen as very attractive for any country, as there seemed to be far more reasons to join a war than not to. At the turn of the twentieth century, everyone seemed to anticipate a war so that they could show the world how strong and powerful they were. This meant that people also began to adopt a very complacent view on war, believing that if there ever were a war, their country would, no doubt, win easily. This nationalism and patriotism was further encouraged by national leaders, policies and jingoism and without the internet or other world-based source of information, the only place people could look for what was going on in the world was the media of their own country. This made it even easier for governments to keep up popular nationalism up to the war. A sense of xenophobia led to a racial distrust of foreigners and also a glorious view of war, further presenting the idea of war as an attractive idea. This self-vanity is especially significant in leaders and national figures, such as Chamberlain, who are figures of national inspiration and motivation. This strong nationalism may also be responsible for the rise of many new expansionist…

    • 2689 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The outbreak of The Great War in 1914 was due to escalated tension between several countries, which resulted in forming a number of alliances. European countries created alliances because of fear. Countries became more scared of each other, and therefore decided to outline agreements in case of war. The Triple Entente was a significant alliance that was made between Russia, France and Britain to contradict the increasing threat from Germany, as well as prevent German Expansion in Europe.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Due to the lack of wars in the previous 100 years of European history, everyone was all riled up and ready for a fight. Initially all the countries thought that they would do a little fighting and quickly get it out of their system; most people were even celebrating the war declaration. One example can be seen in Stefan Zweig’s Autobiography. He writes, “.... young recruits were marching triumphantly, their faces lighting up at the cheering…”(Doc 2) As an Austrian writer, Zweig was a countryman of the country who pretty much started everything by declaring war on Serbia. As an Austrian he must have been proud in the moment and it is evident in the way he writes about the excitement in the streets. However, as he writes this looking back, his tone has clearly changed over time and even though he has fond memories of this moment, he now as he is writing realizes the mistake made by his countrymen in fighting. Nevertheless, the scene at the beginning of war is an exciting one for many Austrians who see a swift victory over Serbia. Similarly enough, a British writer who also recounting the day war was declared, states that he is amazed at the people cheering in the streets, for who wants a war? (Doc 3) Both documents together provide evidence that the initial excitement of war was not specific to one country but a…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Europe economic tension between nations was at an all time high and created a lot of competition. When the Treaty of Versailles was created, the “war-guilt” clause put the sole responsibility of the war on Germany. It also made Germany pay for all the damage caused by the war to the other nations. Many nations were inspired by nationalistic dignity to join the war. France had joined the war because they wanted to obtain back the territory in Alsace-Lorraine. Many nations like Italy, Japan, and China joined for this reason, to gain back all of the territories that they had lost. Therefore, nationalism fueled many nations into the war because it created competition and a hope for gaining…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nations go to war because of beliefs, alliances and resources. The website, “Cause of World War I”, reveals that wars occur because of leaders’ aggression and alliances between nations. German Kaiser William II wanted to have dominance over Great Britain and France. The alliances formed between nations caused the large number of countries to be involved in the war. Russia’s willingness to support Serbia and the strong bond between Germany and Austria-Hungary caused these countries to be involved when Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia. The alliance of the Central Powers and Entente Powers caused the involvement of Great Britain, France and the Ottoman Empire. The same reason is echoed in Remarque’s novel, All Quiet on the Western Front, when Paul Baumer stated the reason for the First World War: “generals and emperors need at least one war in their life or they don’t become famous.” Baker’s short story, “Finished with the War”, expresses the same reason when Siegfried Sasson declared that: “I believe that this war, has now become a war of aggression and conquest.” Both non-fiction books, History of World War II and The World at Arms, reflected similar reasons. Adolf Hitler’s aggressive ambitions to expand Germany’s lebensraum, living space, caused World War Two. The website, “The United Sates and the Iran-Iraq War”, and the Otago Daily Times article, “The Gulf Crisis and the United Nations”, reveal…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays