Preview

Psychology of law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1027 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Psychology of law
13. Which aspect of police interrogation procedures do you consider to be most troublesome or problematic? Why? Support your position with evidence

I believe the aspect of police interrogations that is most troublesome is the coercive aspect. The reason I believe this is a serious problem is some interviewees are more susceptible to giving false confessions than others, even under the slightest pressure from police. Children, teenagers, the mentally handicapped, drug users, and people with psychological problems may be the most vulnerable. Even though psychological coercion is the primary cause of police-induced false confessions, individuals differ in their ability to withstand interrogation pressure and thus in their susceptibility to making false confessions. All other things being equal, those who are highly suggestible or compliant are more likely to confess falsely. Interrogative suggestibility tends to be heightened by sleep deprivation, fatigue, and drug or alcohol withdrawal. Individuals who are highly compliant tend to be conflict avoidant, acquiescent, and eager to please others, especially authority figures. With these coercive tactics, the police play on these weaknesses and pray on the individuals. This is a problem even if the individual is in fact guilty but is much more of a problem when the individual is innocent and gives a false confession.

Authorities, researchers and the media have focused a growing awareness of incidences of coerced false confessions, as well as the associated personal and legal implications involved. The Innocence Project, a non-profit legal clinic that assists those wrongfully convicted of crimes, claims that 8% of wrongful convictions are due to forced confessions prompted by police. Consequently, measures have been taken to try and reduce their frequency. There are many aspects in which coercive tactics are problematic but for the sake of this essay I will focus solely on its leading to false confessions.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1) What police procedures are used during arrests, and how do these procedures lead people to feel confused, fearful, and dehumanized?…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In "The Social Psychology of False Confessions: Compliance, Internalization, and Confabulation" by Saul M. Kassin and Katherine L. Kiechel, the author asserts that false evidence supporting a crime will make individuals admit to a guilt even if they did not commit such thing. To support this the author provides us with information about the experiment, the research information derived from the experiment, and real life scenarios. In the introduction the authors give us techniques and information on how the police get what they are in search of. These methods include presentation of false evidence such as fingerprints, appeals to god and religion, false friendships, and prison informants. interrogation are done with the same process, police…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although there are several reasons that people confess to a crime they did not commit, two of the most common is mental and psychological exhaustion. First, when a suspect is kept in interrogation for numerous hours, they have the tendency to say and agree with whatever the interrogator says. “Innocent suspects confess because they are terrified, confused and exhausted; because they are deceived or tricked; because they don’t understand what they are doing; and because they feel hopeless, helpless and isolated”(Gross &Possley). Second, officers who conduct “modern” interrogations may lie about the evidence and tell the suspect that his fingerprints were found at the scene; that a codefendant already confessed and put the blame on him; that he was seen by an eyewitness. They routinely say that they already have him dead to rights and that this is his only chance to tell his side of the story and help…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution forbids the use of coerced confessions in criminal proceedings (Peak et at, 2010). However, internal investigations are a different matter. The U.S Supreme Court case of Garrity v. New Jersey defined what must be done. The case got its start when officers under investigation for fixing citations were ordered to give statements or be fired (Roufa, 2014). The statements were then used to convict the officers and they appealed saying that their statements were coerced with the threat of being fired (Roufa, 2014). The court agreed and what arose from the case was the Garrity rule which states “that if an officer is compelled to provide self-incriminating information or statements, such statements…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author David Simon writes an informative article on the topic of a homicide unit in Baltimore. He writes this to let the citizens of Baltimore know how interrogation works. His book, Homicide: A Year on the Killing Streets gives us a very detailed view on this. Homicide detectives work hard to get information out of suspects. They like to give their suspects a false hope of becoming free if they give up the info. They call this hope an imaginary window, an escape hatch in which they might be able to crawl out of. When done correctly the detectives can get all the information they need from the person. The guiltiest person is constantly the first person looking for an out; after all, if you’re not guilty what are you scared of? The interrogation is closely related to a performance, it that helps the detectives get “common ground” with his suspects when non-exist. When a suspect gets comfortable, he/she is more likely to talk. This “performance” is highly important because in Baltimore, a…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suspects make short-sighted confession decisions by focusing on proximal consequences rather than distal ones. Recent research suggests that this predisposition is worsened by conditions within the suspects’ police interrogation. A confession is arguably one of the most valuable and convincing forms of evidence. Thus, it is important to understand what influences suspects to confess to crimes they do not commit. In the two experiments conducted, factors that could influence the likelihood of a suspect to overlook the distal consequences in their decision to confess or not were: the duration of the interrogation, the perceived severity of the crime committed, and the suspects’…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Among various arrests, people who are put in jail or prison due to their confession must make them a proven criminal, right? Unfortunately, not everybody who confesses to a crime is in fact guilty. A false confession is an act of confessing to a crime that the confessor didn’t commit. That creates a conflict involving the individual being accused and the trust towards police interrogation. For instance, after nearly eight years in prison, Nicole Harris sued eight Chicago police detectives, alleging that they coerced her confession (Meiser Para.2)…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three issues focus in this article: the manner in which false confession generated, change in susceptibility to interrogative influence, and how false confession lead the wrongful conviction of innocents. In the Norfolk Four case, police pressured the innocent suspects and generate four false confessions. Using the case of the Norfolk Four, the author claims the seven psychological processes that are often involved from false confessions to wrongful conviction. The psychological behavior has affected the confessor and others thinking and actions involved to produce a wrongful…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading the article and the chapter I came to the conclusion that police will do anything in their hands to pressure and find incriminating evidence in cases where there might be none in order to solve a case. I don’t want to sound bias due to my personal experiences but the reality is that the goal of “questioning” is to elicit a confession which in many cases police will pressure to get one. I wasn’t aware using false evidence is legal in order to peer-pressure possible suspects to provoke a confession. From a personal perspective I believe this is wrong in many levels and even thought the article states it is only used in “some” cases I believe the police is capable of taking advantage of it. Police of course prefer confessions rather than other type of evidence due to the fact that it saves them time and they can avoid trial.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One study found that 90% of the observed interrogations, interrogators presented the suspect with evidence that they were guilty (Janda, 2015). In addition, interrogators are trained to express unwavering confidence that the suspect is guilty and to refuse to listen to any explanations or alibis. This can create a biased opinion of guilt within the interrogator.…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Professor Drizin states "These tactics are designed to destroy the suspect's confidence that he will emerge from the interrogation without being harmed and to make the suspect think that he is powerless to bring an end to the interrogation unless he confesses. (Drizin,…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It should be noted that in many cases it 's only the guilty who confesses. Use of trickery and deception exposes human weaknesses. The stress levels arising from psychological manipulation due to dominance, control and dependence by the police end up making even the hardened criminal to confess (Blandon, Sperry & Leo, 2010). As such the deception of maximizing and minimizing the consequences of the crime committed and in cases shifting blame on others provide a leeway for suspects to confess. The interrogator therefore requires having the right combinations of circumstances or consequences pertaining to the suspects’ experiences and…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The suspect is interrogated, presented with false information, and admits guilt to actions he or she committed; or the suspect is interrogated, presented with false information, and admits guilt to actions he or she never committed. How and why does this occur, are the tactics that police use justified, and on a whole do they produce competent results? The confession to a crime is viewed by law enforcement and the judicial system as the proverbial nail in the coffin; admission is highly sought and revered. Brasswell et al., (2015) detailed eight deceptive interrogation techniques that law enforcement use to secure an admission, many of which can be viewed simply as police officers doing their job within the constraints the judicial system have given them. Alternately fabricated evidence, exaggerating the nature and severity of the offense, misrepresenting identity, and the use of promises stand out as the four that have an overt ethical dilemma. These tactics have elicited false confessions; coerced-compliant false confessions, and coerced-internalized false confessions (Kassin, 2008), both of which occur with pressure from the police and in this day and age, most of the police induced pressure being psychological in…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Torture Vs Torture

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages

    From the psychological point of view, if the pressure is high enough, an innocent person may “remember” a crime he or she did not even commit. Even Barry C. Feld’s study states that “a confession is compelled, provoked, and manipulated from a suspect by a detective who has been trained in a genuinely deceitful art.” He admits that detectives manipulate their subjects’ minds to cooperate and give a confession. Along with this data, one way detectives obtain information is by presenting false data, misrepresenting facts, and lying (Feld 221). Detectives do this to make the suspect think that something has happened, even if it is really has not, or vice versa. When the person of interest believes this false statement, he might confess, though it may not be true. He may confess because he thinks that the detectives expect any confession and will not let him go until he gives them some sort of information. In this case, the person of interest, who is under tons of stress, will invent some story to appease the detective. Because this sort of interrogation places the suspect under a lot of stress, society believes that it should not be…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Studies show that eyewitness testimony is the greatest cause of wrongful convictions to date. Prosecutors don’t always rely on physical evidence to land a conviction. Rather, they often focus on verbal evidence, such as witness statements and confessions, to sway jurors in their favor. It has been shown that juries are significantly more likely to bring forth a guilty verdict if there is eyewitness corroboration of the crime. Although eyewitness testimony has proven unreliable time and time again, and many convictions have been overturned due to contradictory evidence, jurors still unduly place faith in this sort of evidence. Jurors must become informed…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays