Avoiding the Groupthink Trap Remain impartial. The leader should not take a directive role but should remain impartial. Seek outside opinions. The leader should invite outside opinions from people who are not members of the group and who are less concerned with maintaining group cohesiveness. Create subgroups. The leader should divide the groups into subgroups that first meet separately and then meet together to discuss their different recommendations. Seek anonymous opinions. The
Premium Decision making Decision theory Decision making software
The Challenger disaster is a prime example of poor leadership and Groupthink. When examining the disaster that took the lives of 7 people‚ this occurred do to multiple forms of neglect and pressure felt by leaders (UK Essays‚ 2015). This disaster occurred due to numerous defects within NASA’s engineering leaders‚ pressure from the media‚ public opinion‚ and the relationship with leaders at Morton Thiokol‚ makers of the defective O-rings that ultimately destroyed the Challenger into pieces (Dimitroff
Premium Space Shuttle Space exploration NASA
The Challenger space shuttle exploded shortly after launch‚ killing all of the crewmembers aboard at the time including the “first teacher in space”‚ Christa McAuliffe. This disaster was felt all across the world as people looked in aww that what happened to the crewmembers. The explosion ended up call NASA a total of about two billion dollars and then years of distrust for the organization. After the Explosion NASA launched a major investigation to determine why the shuttle had exploded. In the
Premium Space Shuttle Challenger
supposedly independent minds. A number of problems will be examined: group polarization‚ groupthink‚ brainstorming and escalation of commitment. In this essay‚ it will focus on groupthink and firstly will give the definition and then talk about symptoms‚ give some examples about how groupthink make decision false and give some ideas about how to prevent it and finally give a conclusion. According to Janis (1982)‚ groupthink is a condition that occurs when group member’s primary drive is to achieve group
Premium Critical thinking Decision making
What Is the Difference Between Group Polarization and Groupthink? When we join together in groups‚ most times we have to make decisions about something the group will do. Social psychologists have discovered tendencies which we do while making group decisions. Two of theses tendencies are group polarization and groupthink. Group polarization refers to a situation in which the attitudes or decisions of people in the group come on much stronger than in actuality. Usually when people with different
Premium Political party Cognition Political philosophy
Major points Groupthink is a form of a phenomenon characterized by members of a group choosing to evaluate consensus and conformity and preservation of the group above other values. In the example of Pennsylvania State University football assistant coach Jerry Sandusky abused children. While Sandusky colleague’s choses to protect him rather than doom Penn State image and program. The decision was based primarily on how group members will react rather than what was at the ethical or professional
Premium Marketing Customer service American football
no one thinks very much”. Groupthink is the process of thinking as a group in a way that discourages creativity or individual responsibility. Arthur Miller‚ an American playwright‚ essayist‚ and prominent figure in the twentieth century‚ wrote The Crucible to warn the American people of groupthink and the abuse of its power. Groupthink has its benefits which allows groups to come to a conclusion and socialize. However‚ its power can be abused to harm a community. Groupthink is an important part of
Premium Sociology Facebook Social network service
One setting in which groupthink occurs in the movie 12 Angry Men. The movie is about a jury who must reach a verdict of guilty or not guilty on a murder case. 11 out of the 12 jurors vote “guilty”‚ while one votes “not guilty.” The lonely juror proves his case‚ and slowly gains alliance. The more people that change the verdict to not guilty‚ an increase of stress is put on the other jurors. They all end up changing vote to not guilty in the end to gain conformity. Groupthink
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
negative effects‚ and groupthink is an example of the latter: Groupthink can lead to faulty decision making‚ ignored crucial alternatives‚ and varied ideas left behind. Furthermore‚ groupthink occurs when a group is highly cohesive‚ and the group members share strong relationships. Fortunately‚ there are many ways to avoid it‚ two of them are bringing people from the outside and letting people know that the leader of the group isn’t autocratic. One of the best ways to avoid groupthink is bringing people
Premium Cognition Sociology Social psychology
Studies have found that there is a positive correlation between economic growth of developing nations and the success of attracting foreign direct investments. Thus‚ President Olusegun Obasanjo adopted the tactic of shuttle diplomacy in tackling the innate problems his administration inherited from the previous Odysseus-military regimes particularly the Abacha regime that earned Nigeria a pariah status due to the inhuman conducts of violating human rights. In addition‚ the Olusegun Obasanjo administration
Premium Economics Globalization United States