Preview

U.S. Gaap vs. Ifrs on Depreciation

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
470 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
U.S. Gaap vs. Ifrs on Depreciation
U.S. GAAP vs. IFRS on Depreciation
Generally, U.S GAAP and IFRS both view depreciation as allocation of cost over an asset’s life. There are three steps of the depreciation process: firstly find depreciable base of the asset, and then estimate asset’s useful life and last choose a method of cost apportionment that best matches revenue flow from the asset.
Depreciation methods allowed under U.S. GAAP include straight-line, units of production, or accelerated methods (sum of digits or declining balance). Component depreciation is allowed but not commonly used. On the other hand, IFRS allows straight-line, units of production, and both accelerated methods. Component depreciation is required when asset components have different benefit patterns. Thus the impact of major differences results that assets with different components will have different depreciation schedules, which may increase or decrease assets and revenue.
Under both GAAP and IFRS, changes in depreciation method and changes in useful life are treated in the current and future periods, in other words- not retrospectively. Under IFRS, estimates of useful life and residual value, and the method of depreciation, are reviewed at least at each annual reporting date. For a company currently using GAAP a change to IFRS could result in a greater frequency of revisions in deprecation rate which in turn could mean less predictable depreciation expense.
IFRS allows a company to choose between two different models in order to value PP&E after it has been recognized on the books: the historical cost model and the revaluation model. Cost model is like GAAP where PP&E is carried at its cost less any accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses. Revaluation model allows a company to revalue PP&E on its books to fair value if fair value can be reliably measured. However, GAAP does not permit revaluations of PP&E or mineral resources. Thus for a company currently using GAAP a change to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Comparing IFRS to GAAP

    • 798 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In component depreciation, depreciation occurs when assets have fundamentally different parts that depreciate in different ways. With IFRS a company is required to use component depreciation if the parts of an asset are varied. The same holds true for GAAP but companies in the US rarely practice in this way.…

    • 798 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acct. 551 Final Project

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    All property, plant, and equipment for the parent and subsidiary companies are recorded at historical cost. The method of depreciation for each asset is determined according to current accounting rules and regulations as set forth by GAAP. All amortization, including the amortization of intangible assets, is on a straight-line basis over the estimated life of the intangible asset. All useful asset lives for amortization and depreciation have been estimated as accurately as possible. Any changes that occur in estimations are thoroughly noted and accounted for in the respective period when it is determined that the useful life should be changed.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ACC 290 IFRS v. GAAP

    • 1158 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While the standards of GAAP and the IFRS are different in many areas, their conceptual framework and general principles provide similar and in most cases, the same information. They both require disclosures with regards to the accounting principles a company follows,…

    • 1158 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ACA1 TASK 3

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The calculation of the straight line method of depreciation is by taking the cost of the item minus its salvage value then dividing that figure by the expected year’s life cycle of the item. This is a non complex calculation and it reduces net income and the equal amounts of depreciation are deducted from every life cycle year of the item.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    IFRS TO GAAP

    • 814 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The component depreciation is when an asset fundamentally has different parts that will be depreciated with the different treatment. When under the IFRS, companies are required to use component depreciation only if the parts of the asset offer vary patterns of benefit. So the main reason behind that is it provides a clearing picture of the asset’s value. This would be also permitted under the GAAP, from what I have read U.S. companies barely use it in practice.…

    • 814 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Valuation refers to the asset being recorded and disclosed at current market price regardless of whether that price is above or below cost. Depreciation is the allocation of the cost of a plant asset to expense over its useful or service life in a rational and systematic manner. There are three methods that can be used for depreciation and a company must pick which method they want to use and stick with that method. Amortization is the systematic write-off of an intangible asset that has an useful life and it is classified as an operating expense in the income statement. Depletion refers to the allocation of the cost of natural resources to expense in a rational and systematic manner and is only used for natural resources.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper seeks to analyze the GAAP and the IFRS, their mandate and functions. Further, it shall compare the differences and similarities of the two standards which have such great implications to the functions of accountants, attorneys, corporate directors and financial officers.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Research Case 1

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Regarding question #1, GAAP states that all prior periods affected should be re- stated and balances rolled forward accordingly. IFRS allows in statement IAS 8, para 49 for the subjective evaluation of practicality with regard to how far back the re-statement should go.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    IFRS does allow revaluation of plant assets for their fair value on the date of the reporting. A company which…

    • 832 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The accounting for changes in estimates and accounting principle is similar between GAAP and IFRS. They both indicate that companies…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are several differences between the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The IFRS is considered more of a "principles based" accounting standard in contrast to U.S. GAAP which is considered more "rules based." By being more "principles based", IFRS, arguably, represents and captures the economics of a transaction better than U.S. GAAP. As a team me collaborated to answer the following seven questions.…

    • 835 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Property and equipment are stated at cost. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged against operations. Renewals and betterment’s that materially extend the life of the assets are capitalized. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the related assets. For income tax purposes, depreciation is computed using the accelerated cost method (AICPA).…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    U.S. Gaap vs. Ifrs

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Another example of the different procedures between IFRS and GAAP is in the evaluation of intangibles. GAAP focuses mostly on recording them at a set price, and amortizing that value over the amount of useful life of the intangible. IFRS stresses constant re-evaluation of the price, and recognition at the intangible's fair value (Miska).…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing IFRS to GAAP

    • 889 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Component depreciation happens when an asset has fundamentally different parts that should be depreciated with different treatment. Under IFRS, firms are required to use component depreciation if the…

    • 889 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sprint Nextel Case

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Both U.S. GAAP and IFRS require goodwill to be written down when impaired. There are some differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS in recognizing and recording impairment, but in principle, the ultimate goal is the same. Both standards require entities to test impairment for goodwill if there appears to be any indication that impairment may exist. Goodwill, along with any other indefinite lived assets, must be tested annually for impairment.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays