Preview

Tort Law Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
428 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Tort Law Essay Example
Negligence is a type of Tort law, which is a legal term that means criminal wrong, as opposed to a civil wrong, having mandatory duties for all citizens in that jurisdiction. In this law, the aims are deterrence, compensation and justice which can basically induce as protect people's bodies and property in order to make people behave properly. Negligence placed an important role in tort law system. Apart from negligence, there are certain torts that specifically protect particular areas such as Defamation for protecting individual's reputation and Trespass for protecting Land, Person as well as Goods.
If one party fail to exercise reasonable car, thereby causing injury to others or damage to property, he will then be negligent. In definition, negligence is concerned with compensating people who have suffered damage as a result of the carelessness of some parties else. In order to establish negligence, that is the duty of claimant to prove that the defendant committed the negligence law, having three essentials elements need to be considered.
The first element of establishing negligence is that the defendant owed a duty of care to the claimant. It is general that motorists owe a duty of care to other road users, employers owe a dusty of care to their employees as well as doctors owe a duty of care to their patients and so on. However, there was no generalised duty of care in negligence before a case called Donoghue v Stevenson [1932]. In this case, it illustrates an important principle called "Neighbour Principle", greatly affecting the clarification of duty of care as well as the negligence law. Mrs Donoghue was given a ginger beer by her friend, who bought it from Mr Stevenson's shop located in Scotland. A snail was found in the beer and eventually Donoghue suffered from illness. However, there was no contract relationship between Donoghue and Stevenson. Thus, the court interpreted the message of neighbour principle, meaning that parties must take reasonable

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The (Plaintiff) Johnny Singstealer is seeking the sum of $1 million from the (Defendant) Bobby Bandleader, for alleged copyright abuse of the song “Happy Birthday to You”. The (Plaintiff) Johnny Singstealer is the copyright holder to the said song. The (Defendant) Bobby Bandleader is a Bistro owner who performs the song in an altered version (his own words are used) to his customers on their birthdays and have been doing so for the past twenty years without obtaining any licensing or permission from the copyright holder (Plaintiff) Johnny Singstealer.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MARGARET JEAN McBRIDE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CALIFORNIA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY, Defendant and Respondent.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence is defined as “the failure to exercise the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised in a similar situation; any conduct that falls below the legal standard established to protect others against unreasonable risk of harm.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1133 (9th ed. 2009) …

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bugusa Case Summary

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort of negligence applies in this scenario. Negligence is described as a party who fails to act reasonably, even when the act is not intentionally, or it does not intend for harm to occur (Melvin, 2011).…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Cheeseman (2013), negligence is a "A doctrine that says a person is liable for harm that is the foreseeable consequence of his or her actions" (p.91). The elements of negligence include:…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nadel Law Case Essay Example

    • 5133 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Edward J. Felson and Stephen R. Felson, Cincinnati, for appellants. Jonathan P. Saxton, Cincinnati, for appellee Burger King Corporation. Droder & Miller Co., L.P.A., A. Dennis Miller and Kevin J. Ryan, Cincinnati, for appellee Emil, Inc.…

    • 5133 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    En1320 Unit 1 Research Paper 1

    • 27742 Words
    • 111 Pages

    negligence, or under any other theory of liability) for any loss or damage of any kind or nature related to, arising under,…

    • 27742 Words
    • 111 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the free supply ceased Ms Cole and a friend purchased and consumed further bottles of Spumante. Ms Cole was refused service at the bar in the afternoon because of her intoxicated state. Ms Cole stayed at the Club and its surrounds for the day and was ejected between 5.30 and 6pm for being intoxicated. The Club had offered to call a taxi for Ms Cole as well as offering her the use of the Club bus and driver. One of the men Ms Cole was with had told the Club manager that he would look after her. At some time after this Ms Cole left the Club. Mrs Lawrence 's vehicle hit Ms Cole at around 6.20pm. She had been travelling within the speed limit, it was dark and she had her lights on low beam at the time of the accident. Mrs Lawrence 's evidence was that she had not seen Ms Cole until it was too late to avoid the collision. Ms Cole, who was wearing black clothing, suffered serious injuries from the accident and has continuing disabilities. The trial judge held that Mrs Lawrence had been negligent in that she had failed to keep a proper lookout while driving. Her liability for the injuries suffered by Ms Cole was assessed at 30%. The Club was also held liable for continuing to serve Ms Cole when she was intoxicated. The Club 's liability was also assessed at 30%. His Honour held that Ms Cole had…

    • 9301 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The following paper will examine an article detailing the definition intellectual property. Additionally, it will make example of the laws that govern and protect the creation and use of intellectual property.…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Negligence – conduct that falls below the standard established by law for the protection of others against unreasonably risk of harm; not intentional and usually by accident…

    • 5389 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rule: Base on Atkin's NeighbourTest, to prove that the defendant (Li) owed the plaintiff (Paul Henri) a duty of care , we must prove that at the time of Li's careless act, the consequences caused by that careless act were reasonably foreseeable and directly related to the plaintiff (Donoghue v. Stevenson).…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negligence consists of four different elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. In order to collect damages for the harm done the claimant must prove several things: the duty of care one owes to another, the standard of care expected by one from another, breach of the duty of care, and damage(s) either physical, emotional or monetary. In…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elements Of Negligence

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page

    Negligence law states that a person or an organization is generally liable when they negligently injure others.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Duty of Care Unit12

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Lord Atkin defined the duty of care when he gave judgement in the case of Donoghue v Stephenson (House of Lords 1932 relating to a case of a “snail” found in ginger beer sold to a customer” ). He said that:…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts Breakdown of Elements

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages

    2. Negligence is the failure of an ordinary, reasonable, and prudent person to exercise due care, resulting in harm or injury to the plaintiff. Negligence torts do not require intent. Negligence is conduct that falls below the level necessary to protect others against unreasonable risks of harm. To determine if someone should be found liable for a negligence tort, a reasonable person standard is used. If the defendant 's behavior is found to be less careful than behavior a reasonable person would exhibit, that defendant can be found liable for damages.…

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays