Preview

Pro-Gun Rights Essay Example

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2115 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pro-Gun Rights Essay Example
“Shall Not Be Infringed”

“When Governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.” (Beck 35). This quote is from one of the greatest men in the history of the United States of America, Thomas Jefferson, the father of the Declaration of Independence, and the third President of the United States. The validity of his statement is not only historical, but as pertinent today as it was when spoken anew. It is learned in schools across the nation, although the importance of the words depends on the teacher, school, and region of the country. During the revolutionary period, King George learned this same concept the hard way, “…an armed populace is a populace that will not be pushed around.” (Beck 35).
One of the rights that have been afforded to law abiding Americans is the right to bear arms. There are many arguments regarding gun control laws in this country. From the founding of the United States, these arguments have been debated. Many objections to owning guns are based on lack of research, or believing someone who has an agenda to end the right. Precious few defense stories have been offered by the media reporting on how gun ownership helps protect property or has saved a life. Division regarding individual gun ownership has been a conflict since 1789, when discussions and subsequent inclusion of the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution of the United States (Tindall 204).
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (Beck 35). These words are second among the ten basic rights that are listed in the Bill of Rights, following only freedom of speech, religion, and expression. These twenty-seven words are arguably the most powerful, but also the most debated. Within the construction of the Second Amendment the “Militia” is specifically mentioned in the preamble. Many of those who advocate

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.…

    • 4325 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2nd Amendment Rights APA

    • 3553 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution states that a well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The exact wording of the amendment has been changed twice before the U.S. Senate finally approved it in its present form.…

    • 3553 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    To better understand why the language of the 2nd amendment was used in such a way at to regarding arming individuals and maintaining militias, it’s necessary to understand the history of the people who wrote it. A foundation of political thought during the Revolutionary period was the well justified concern about political corruption and governmental tyranny. The right to bear arms was a potential check against tyranny. According to Sandra Alters in her book Gun Control: Restricting Rights or Protecting People, “without guns in the hands of the early patriots, the fledgling republic might have quickly turned tyrannical, disarmed the people at…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the long and storied history of the United States of America, the right to own, bear and keep firearms, along with the right to defend oneself, is as central to the American identity as apple pie. However, unlike American cuisine, the issue of “gun politics” (as many academics and pundits call the issue) or gun control in the United States is extremely polarizing. During the last couple decades, the debate over gun control has been characterized by a stalemate between the individual's right to own firearms protected by the Constitution and the duty of government to prevent crime and maintain order. Stated differently, the current debate surrounding the right to bear and keep firearms within…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Essay Example

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There is a major debate going on in the U.S. on gun control. Should people have the right to carry a concealed weapon or should they only be allowed to have a gun in their home? Another question is if the government were to ban guns would that be doing us law-abiding citizens more harm then good? Or maybe they should only allow guns in the hands of people that have had background checks and our licensed to handle them. [C]itizens in Missouri, North Carolina, and Texas are asking their state legislatures for the ability to defend themselves against violent criminal attack regardless of where the attack takes place”(Swasey 175).…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Amendment Essay

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (law.cornell.edu). These twenty-seven words are the Second Amendment of the Constitution. Where did this amendment come from? How did the founding fathers of the United States come up with this? This paper will show the foundation of where the Second Amendment came from, how it became an amendment, and what happened after the amendment went into effect.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment of the US Constitution states : "A well regulated militia being necessary…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pro Gun Control Essay

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is gun control? Gun control is when the government puts rules and regulations on where one can bring guns. Governments also limit the amount of guns one owns. Guns are a way to protect our families, stop criminals, and a way to hunt to provide food for families. Some people abuse guns and bring harm to others which is horrible. There should not be a law on gun control. This law restricts those who own them to protect themselves and restricts them from having a firearm. Keeping guns in the United States is the best option for America.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Second Amendment

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout many years there has always been a debate about the infamous Second Amendment, which states from the constitution, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Even till this day people argue whether or not people should have a right to own a gun.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Research

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Second Amendment states “"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" (Bill of Rights). It was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. Americans felt that the right to arms was important for different reasons such as stopping invasions, participating in law enforcement, enabling the people to organize a militia system, preventing an undemocratic government, etc. Later into the twentieth century, a debate had grown about. The question most frequently being asked in many different words are, is the amendment that was created to ensure the continuation and successful of the state militias as a means of defense, or was it created to ensure an individual’s right to own a firearm. People, gun control advocates, began to read the second amendment concerned with rising violence in society and the role firearms play in that violence. While on the other side, firearm enthusiasts saw the attacks on gun ownership as attacks on freedom and defended their interpretation of the second amendment just as aggressively. Much of the debate that is going on today is centered on how the amendment was phrased and no…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Against Gun Control Essay

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages

    where i stand on gun control is that i believe we should have the right to get a gun but i feel like we might need to keep the rules and regulations on guns because everyone doesn't have the mentality that if you have a gun it can kill someone if you pull the trigger and some people have illegal guns that just have them for violences are so they can protect there self from other people who have guns but we do have people that believe guns are here to protect us not so you can just kill someone but if they get assault are get robbed they have that option to protect therself.There’s been debates and laws made are talked about being change like the bill of rights over guns and our rights as US citizens. personally why i believe we should have the rights to have a gun legal if your main purpose is to use it for protection not for killing out of rage or anger.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control Debate

    • 2680 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Second Amendment text states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed (Jefferson)” The argument over the second amendment is basic and complex at the same time. Most of the controversy is over the vagueness of the terms…

    • 2680 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The Founding Fathers included this in our Bill of Rights because they feared the Federal Government might oppress the population if the people did not have the means to defend themselves as a nation and as individuals. (Halbrook 65-84)…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Anti Gun Control

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The second amendment of the Constitution says, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Analysis of this clause varies depending on how one wants to interpret. For example, someone who views the amendment with the original intent of the framers’ might view the amendment as the states being able to rise up against the possibility of tyranny. If the president dispersed Congress and take away the State’s voice and choice to pass their own laws, that would be tyranny, and a state militia would be able to rise up against it with the weapons they were allowed to have. To a person who wants to read it as the amendment is written, the right to own guns should not be infringed because citizens need a well-regulated militia to protect our liberties. The difference is that the protection against tyranny is not implied in this belief. Critics believe that the Constitution should be read and interpreted as Americans now. To which, a well regulated militia is not what citizens have. Even though citizens can have certain high powered and high magazine…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays