Preview

A Crime of Compassion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
761 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Crime of Compassion
Barbara, a nurse, is accused of “murder”, by the audience of a TV show named the Phil Donahue show. She had a patient, named Mac, who had lung cancer and was resuscitate 52 times. It was between the years of 1970s and 80s, and the law of how many times someone should be resuscitated have not passed yet. Barbara injected Mac with pain medication and did not press the code button until after he was dead. Now after being resuscitated for that amount of time you could only imagine his pain and stress. The nurse should not be accused of murder because the man “who she murdered” begged for his life to be taken, he was terminally ill, and the doctors were just prolonging his life and not really saving it.
Patients, like Mac, have the right to decided if they want to die or not. In the 1970s-1980s, such laws have not been passed yet but out of common courtesy and someone begging to take their life away-what would you do? Mac had decided way before the 52nd resuscitate that he wanted to give up on life. His wife, Maura, even agreed with his decision. After being a young well put together man that was a cop with an endless cough to someone who can not even stand up by himself, was very overwhelming and the six months of his treatment was not enough. “He begged us: ‘Mercy...for God’s sake, please just let me go’.” (Huttmann. 187) How many times does a patient have to ask or even beg to take their life before you do so, and it should have not been up to the doctor but up to their family.
“..when no amount of pain medication stilled his moaning and agony... ‘Pain...no more...Barbara...do something...God, let me go.’” (188) Those quotes are proof that the medications were not working and Mac was terminally ill, which means that he will eventually die. Being alive is basically being able to do things and live on your own, with Mac’s situation he was basically dead. He could only eat liquid food through a tube, have i.v. Solutions enter his veins, an oxygen mask, being soak in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case study goes as such: Mr. Martinez was a seventy-five year old COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) patient. He was in the hospital because of an upper respiratory tract infection. He and his wife had already requested that CPR should not be performed if he required it and a DNR is placed in his charts. While in his room on third floor, being maintained with antibiotics, fluids, and oxygen and seemed to be doing better. However, Mr. Martinez’s oxygen was inadvertently turned up, causing him to go into respiratory failure. This scenario in my opinion causes for drastic measures and I personally feel like his wishes should be overthrown by what the caring physician sees ethically and morally right. The doctor should look at all the circumstances in front of themselves and make an ethical decision. Mr. Martinez was previously being treated and had been improving. Although some may argue that he already has a disease that could be terminal. Looking at the bigger picture of the situation that he was being treated for the upper respiratory infection and he was progressing. I believe he should be transferred to intensive care so that his oxygen level can be monitored and his respiratory failure be treated by a ventilator.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The infamous “Terri Schaivo case” was one of ethical vs. medical consideration, and how those decisions made impacted how human euthanasia is currently viewed. From a healthcare provider’s perspective, we will be reviewing this topic and its related ethical implications, laws regarding this topic, and the stakeholders involved in the case. While the Schaivo case is reviewed here, we will also discuss the impact it has had on social values, morals, norms, and nursing practice as we attempt to explore the impact this trial has had on…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PROCEDURAL HISTORY- Young stab victim was brought into the hospital on March 1981, who had no vital signs. The ER doctors on staff tried to resuscitate. He started to gasp and they installed a Emerson pump into chest to help drain air and blood from chest. 20 minutes his vital signs were back to normal. DR. Gerdes wanted to do a thoracotomy but was unqualified to do so. They then called a DR. who would be able to perform the surgery, Dr. Mc Cool. Dr. Gerdes explained to Dr. Mc cool that the patient was in the hospital and required a thoracotomy, but patient did not have insurance. Dr. Mc Cool wanted the patient to be transferred to Earl K Long Hospital to get better care. The Dr. explained to Dr. Mc Cool that he could not transfer patient and Dr Mc Cool said transfer him. Phone call was then ended and the staff had to make a decision on what to do. The Dr and the nurse were not happy about having to transport this patient. They called for the ambulance. When the paramedics showed up they felt uncomfortable in transporting this type of patient. They had to remove the Emerson pump, when doing so patient started to bleed. Vital signs went down and he died of cardiac arrest.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hsm 542 week 2 you decide

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The morals involved here is the patient’s right to refuse care if she chooses and also the right to die. The moral principles of ethics involved also in this case are: Beneficence- act of doing good, demonstrating kindness, showing compassion, and helping others; Non-maleficence- avoiding the infliction of harm; Justice- the duty to be fair in the distribution of risks and benefits, and; Autonomy- recognizing an individual’s right to make his or her own decisions.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terri Schiavo Case

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How can it be that medicine, ethics, law, and family could work so poorly together in meeting the needs of this woman who was left in a persistent vegetative state after having a cardiac arrest? Ms. Schiavo had been sustained by artificial hydration and nutrition through a feeding tube for 15 years, and her husband, Michael Schiavo, was locked in a very public legal struggle with her parents and siblings about whether such treatment should be continued or stopped. Distortion by interest groups, media hyperbole, and manipulative use of videotape characterized this case and demonstrate what can happen when a patient becomes more a precedent-setting symbol than a unique human being (Quill, 2005). At the time of Terri’s heart attack, she did not have a living will or power of attorney. The question is, should Terri’s husband (Michael Schiavo) have the right to remove her feeding tubes? Michael stated that Terri told him before her heart attack that she would not want to be kept alive by artificial means. On that basis, since 1998, he repeatedly asks a local circuit court to order the removal of a tube that had been surgically implanted in her stomach to provide hydration, nutrition, and medication. On the other hand, Terri’s parents and siblings (who believed that she still have some cognitive function and at least limited potential for improved quality of life) repeatedly blocked Michael’s requested by various legal…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Jack Kevorkian was the face of the assisted suicide movement in the 1990s, and his practices in assisted suicide and euthanasia are shrouded in controversy. According to (Preface p.1), “He invented a killing machine called the mercitron which incapacitated or debilitated people could use to take their own lives: All they had to do was flip a switch.” He became known as Dr. Death and assisted over 130 people in their deaths from 1990-1998. In attempt to bring attention to the Right to Die movement, Dr. Kevorkian was public about his self-described “mercy killings.” In doing so, he had several murder charges brought against him by the state of Michigan. He was never convinced, until his attempt to ratchet up the debate resulted in him taping…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Weeds vs. Flowers

    • 4681 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Dr. Jack Kevorkian is a firm believer in physician-assisted suicide, giving his patients the dignity and respect that they deserved in making this last major decision for their life and how they wanted to end it. His patients thought of him as a hero because he aided them in their major time of need, and they felt very comfortable with him because they didn’t have to worry about feeling awkward when bringing up this method of help. The family members of Kevorkian’s patients were ultimately happy that he provided such ease to their loved ones, and showed nothing but care and respect for those individuals. This decision is a heavy burden to bear because of the feelings that the majority of people feel is wrong and immoral. Dr. Kevorkian was convicted of second degree murder in 1999 because of assistance with euthanizing one of his patients Thomas Youk, who suffered from Lou Gehrig’s disease in 1998. He was provided with financial support by an organization called “The Hemlock Society” for his lawsuit, and they also referred patients to him for their aid in finding a caring physician that would end their suffering.…

    • 4681 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    New technological advances allow for patients to stay alive in situations that they normally could not survive. This causes an increasingly problematic conflict between medical and legal systems. The Uniform Declaration of Death Act allows for a somewhat reliable definition for death in both systems. However, some situations still challenge the universally accepted definition of death. Lia’s situation is a perfect example of how a medical definition of death conflicts with legal conditions. Lia’s complex medical situation showcases how death challenges both the medical and legal systems in America, making it very difficult to offer a concrete definition.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The simple principles of medical ethics are “to avoid harm”, “to do well”, “the right to act freely”, and “acting fairly towards the patient”. Doctors should try to save patient’s life instead of ending it. They have the responsibility not to kill the trusting patients, but give all their best to secure the life of their patients. Even if the patients are hard to cure, they should still try and not make euthanasia an option. Therefore, doctors do not have the right to decide whether their patients would live or die as long as their patients are alive, there is always a hope for curing. For instance, many European countries are legalizing euthanasia. Unfortunately, not only doctors, but also nurses are favoring euthanasia in the extreme…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should physicians be granted the power to intentionally end the lives of their patients? Recent proposals to legalize physician-assisted suicide have raised this question and triggered intense legal, medical and social debate. For some individuals, the debate is fueled by their fear that medical technology may someday keep them alive past the time of natural death. However, this concern is unfounded for mentally competent adults who have a legal right to refuse or stop any medical treatment. It is also important to recognize that today's health care climate lends itself more to undertreatment than overtreatment.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    And with witnessing several people I know take morphine they have not lived long because of the drug’s side effects. There are some doctors who could even increase the dosage if the drug to increase comfort. However, the way this is played out, this kind of euthanasia is acceptable in society because its main goal is to comfort and lessen the person’s suffering. Unlike the registered nurse, Lesley her emotions about her dying mother had caused her to misjudge her thoughts and actions. Even though Lesley is a registered nurse, it is beyond her right to even increase the dosage of any drug. If the doctor had increased the dosage, then giving her mother that amount would have been considered legal. In that case, she wouldn’t have been charged of overdosing her mother, instead she would’ve been guilty of suffocating her.…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the second case, with Nurse Jane having witnessed acts of negligence from her colleague, there…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is always a choice of physician-assisted suicide if the patient is breathing and of sound mind. Moreover, a patient having a less than ten percent chance of living, physician-assisted suicide should be an option. Physicians are healers of disease and injury, preservers of life, and relievers of suffering. Determining the ethical responsibilities of physicians when patients wish to die requires a close examination of the doctor’s role in society (JAMA, 1992-vol 267, No. 16).…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those directly involved in the incident could agree or highly disagree with the inferences I have drawn. The hospital may believe that the nurse was negligent, while she believes she performed a mistake that any nurse could have in this situation. Do to the fact that this mistake had cost someone their life, it is difficult to comprehend all the participating parties thoughts. The family of the patient sees someone who made a mistake that cost their loved one their life and the hospital sees a mistake that cost them their reputation. More importantly the nurse will now how to live with the mistake that she made for the rest of her life. From the nursing perspective Julie had made an honest error that she was forever sorry for, and she was left out to dry for her…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In modern ICU, ethically justified decisions and actions of physicians are already the proximate cause of death for many patients¬¬— for instance, when mechanical ventilation is withdrawn. Whether death occurs as the result of ventilator withdrawal or organ procurement, the ethically relevant precondition is valid consent by the patient or surrogate. With such consent, there is no harm or wrong done in retrieving vital organs before death, provided that anesthesia is administered. With proper safeguards, no patient will die from vital organ donation who would not otherwise die as a result of the withdrawal of life support. Finally, surveys suggest that issues related to respect for valid consent and the degree of neurologic injury may be more important to the public than concerns about whether the patient is already dead at the time the organs are…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics