Preview

Williams V Roffey Bros and Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
11550 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Williams V Roffey Bros and Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd
Page 1

All England Law Reports/1990/Volume 1 /Williams v Roffey Bros and Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd - [1990] 1 All ER 512 [1990] 1 All ER 512

Williams v Roffey Bros and Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd
COURT OF APPEAL, CIVIL DIVISION PURCHAS, GLIDEWELL AND RUSSELL LJJ

2, 3, 23 NOVEMBER 1989 Contract - Consideration - Performance of contractual duty - Performance of existing contractual duty - Agreement to pay additional money to ensure performance of existing contractual duty - Whether sufficient consideration for payment of additional sum - Whether promise by plaintiff to fulfil existing contractual duty good consideration - Whether defendant obtaining benefit from payment of additional sum - Whether obtaining of benefit amounting to consideration for payment of additional sum - Whether agreement to pay additional sum enforceable. The defendant building contractors entered into a contract to refurbish a block of 27 flats and sub-contracted the carpentry work in the refurbishment to the plaintiff carpenter for a price of £20,000. It was an implied term of the sub-contract that the plaintiff would receive interim payments related to work completed. After completing the carpentry work on the roof and nine flats, and carrying out preliminary work on the remaining flats, for which work he received interim payments of £16,200, the plaintiff found that he was in financial difficulties because the price was too low and he had failed to supervise his workmen properly. Furthermore, he had by then received over 80% of the sub-contract price but still had far more than 20% of the work to complete. The defendants, who were liable under a penalty clause in the main contract if it was not completed on time, were aware of the plaintiff's difficulties and that the sub-contract had been underpriced. They called a meeting with the plaintiff at which they agreed to pay the plaintiff an extra £10,300 at the rate of £575 per flat on completion to ensure that the plaintiff continued with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the case of Sopov v Kane Constructions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2009], the appellant engaged the respondent as contractor in a construction project. The appellant repudiated the contract by wrongly calling on the respondent's bank guarantee, in response to which the respondent terminated the contract and claimed damages for quantum meruit. The Court of Appeal applied the NSW Court of Appeal decision in Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 which provided that an innocent party who accepts a defaulting party's repudiation has the option of claiming either damages for breach of contract, or a quantum meruit for the fair value of work done. The initial contract price was held to be only evidentiary for the…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mr. Ralph Gough was under a preexisting duty to construct the trusses for the Kinney shoe store. The general contractor, Chuckrow, was never obligated to pay for the re-erection of those trusses no matter who’s fault if they fell according to the original agreement. Mr. Gough 's preexisting duty cannot operate as consideration or change Chuckrow 's offer to pay. Therefore the contract was not modified, and Chuckrow is obligated only for the original contract price. Hence Mr. Gough cannot recover the funds. (Robert Chuckrow Construction Company v. Gough, 1968)…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Memorandum and Objective: The purpose of the memorandum is to provide a detailed review and analysis of the legal situation considering “Paslay, Bryan & Brooks, Barristers & Solicitors**” and…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiff Wendling

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Plaintiff Wendling, who was a farmer and stockman, met Defendant Puls, who was a cattle buyer in July 1973. The two got to talking and Wendling informed Puls that there was a possibility that he would have cattle for sale around mid August. On August 13th, Puls received a call from Wendling letting him know that he had cattle ready to be sold. The two later met, along with Puls’s financial assistance Watson and agreed on a sales price based on the weight of the cattle on August 16th. Puls left a deposit of 1,000 dollars with Wendling for the cattle. On the scheduled date for pick up, Puls requested an additional week for delivery of the cattle. Needless to say, after the week went by there was no sign of Puls. He failed to respond to any of phone calls or messages left by Wendling. When he was finally able to reach Puls on August 27th, he learned that Puls didn’t have a place to store the cattle. Since there were so many issues, Wendling asked Puls for an additional down payment, which was refused by Puls. Puls went on to suggest that maybe he should just sell his cattle to someone else. At that time, Wendling suggested to Puls that he provide him with a written release, which he just ignored. Wendling went on to seek legal advice and was advised to get a written release from Puls before engaging in another sale of the cattle. Wendling tried to reach Puls, but was unsuccessful; however he was able to reach Watson. He asked Watson if they both would meet him at his lawyers’ office, so that he could obtain a release from the contract in order…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In July of 2000 Curtis Williams was indicted by a grand jury in Williamson County, Texas for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. While under indictment, Williams traveled to Louisiana from Texas on a Greyhound bus. The bus Williams was traveling on was scheduled to make a stop at the Shreveport Greyhound Bus terminal on September 12,…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case is an interesting one because it gets right into the core of the confliction between the proprieties of contractual agreement. This case is focused primarily on Osborne Development Corp. and the multiple defects customers are experiencing with their homes. These upset customers are suing this Corporation in attempts to collect reparations for the discrepancies faced. The homeowners who purchased homes form Osborne Development Corp. (ODC) negligently purchased these homes. According to the Home Buyers Warranty ( HBW), “ Any and all claims disputes and controversies by or between the Homeowner, the Builder, the Warrant Insure and/or HBW…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

      Company A’s Defense: Impracticability and rights to delegate Company A is responsible for the poor workmanship of Company B BREACH OF CONTRACT  Tom’ Offer???  Assessing Tom’s position  Determining Breach Of Contract  Harry’s Legal…

    • 1103 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I don’t agree with the ruling in Webster street Partnership, Ltd. V. Sheridan. I agree that neither Sheridan nor Wilwerding was in need of shelter and since they had voluntarily left home and entered into a contract they should be liable. I don’t’ find it to be fair that the landlord gets taken for the money to which he rightly deserves. The potential money to which he could have actually had in his money was lost since he entered into a contract with the two minors. If I were ruling I would allow them to get out of the rest of the lease but not for what they had spent in the lease. While I understand that minors should be protected I still think that they should be held accountable in situations such as these.…

    • 135 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Defendants Jennifer Storms (“Storms”) and J&J Tool, LLC (“J&J Tool”) for their Answer to the Complaint of Plaintiff M&M Home Contractors, Inc. (“M&M Contractors”), herein state and allege as follows:…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Construction Law Cases

    • 1239 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The issue in this case is between the plaintiff, Leon Slavin, and the defendant, Joan W. Borinstein. Slavin is suing Borinstein over a dispute that erupted over payments on a construction project that were not received; on a project Slavin was building for Borinstein. Borinstein and her people agreed to pay Slavin 10 percent of the cost on a house they wanted to build in Los Angles. They would make the payments in installments. Slavin began to not receive payment for the appellant; then Borinstein’s lawyer tried to modify the contract mid project, therefore trying to reduce the amount owed to Slavin. The two disagreed, initially, however eventually thought they had come to terms on a modification. Soon after Slavin began to not receive payments for the second time, therefore he halted construction. At the time he halted construction the balance reached around $300,000. The rules that were applied are Civil Code section 1697, Civil Code section 1580, Civil Code section 1581, and last Civil Code section 1584. Each rule played its own part in the case and determining the conclusion. Code 1697 states that oral contracts may be modified; this played a role by allowing the respondent to claim that his oral contract was altered. Code 1580 talks about consent and how it needs to be mutual among all parties. This contributed to the case because the court came to the conclusion that the oral modification was not valid because it was not mutual. Code 1581 is relevant to how consent is to be given and communicated among all the parties. Lastly code 1584 states if a party acts on a proposal or states they accept a proposal then the proposal is accepted. This code was important because even though the counter modification wasn’t considered accepted, the initial modification was still effective because after the offer, Slavin continued the project. This allowed for the court to come to a…

    • 1239 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Contract Breach

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Situations that involve written and oral contracts between clients and contractors happen every day. Quite often, a price is agreed upon based on a completion date and the performance that happens along the way. One such situation that I have experienced was when my Dad decided to purchase a brand new townhouse in a downtown Cincinnati residential redevelopment project. A private contractor named Drees had won the rights from the city to be the only firm that could be used in the construction project and they are very popular there. A contract was signed between my parents and the developers that a new home would be built to their specifications and delivered within a six month period and upon that date they could move in. The focus of this analysis is to bring the contract under scrutiny that existed between Drees and my parents and how the contractor performed their duties.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Williams v Roffey Brothers & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd is a fundamental contract law case concerning the legal issue of consideration, in relation to the performance of an existing duty. The claimant, Lester Williams successfully sued the defendant, Roffey Brothers for breach of contract in the Queens Bench Division of the High Court. The defendants appealed to the Court of Appeal where the judges were Glidewell, Russell and Purchas LJ.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Facts:The Defendant on the 29th of May 1879, agreed to grant and the Plaintiff to accept a lease of a mill for seven years at the rent of 30s. a year for each loom run, the Plaintiff not to run less than 540 looms. The lease to contain such stipulations as were inserted in a certain lease of-the 1st of May, which was a lease at a fixed rent made payable in advance, and contained a stipulation that there should at all times be payable in advance on demand one whole year’s rent in a addition to the proportion, if any, of the yearly rent due and unpaid for the period previous to such demand. The Plaintiff was let into possession and paid rent quarterly, not in advance, down to the 1st of January, 1882, inclusive, having run in 1881 560 looms. In March, 1882, the Defendant demanded payment of £1000 14s. 840 as one whole year’s rent for 560 looms at 30s., and £165 as the proportionate part of the rent from the 1st of January last), and put in a. distress. The Plaintiff thereupon commenced his action for damages for illegal distress, for an in- and for specific performance, and moved for an injunction. Fry, J., granted the injunction on the terms of the Plaintiff paying the into Court. The Plaintiff appealed.…

    • 1760 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Existing Contractual Duty

    • 2782 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Explain and justify the traditional approach of the courts and extent to which that approach is varied by the decision in Williams v Roffrey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors), and the decision in the NSW Supreme Court in Musumeci v Winadell Pty Ltd (1994) 34 NSWLR 723.…

    • 2782 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Excelo construction Ltd was employed by Twobob Ltd to construct a mixed us development. Problems started to arise from the start of the project when Twobob failed to hand the site over to Excelo Construction on the agreed date. Twobob’s nominated sub-contractor caused interruptions when Excelo accused them of interfering with their use of site. Excelo Construction began to become unhappy when representatives of Twobob Ltd started to become fussy with the work Excelo was producing and went as far as delaying the release of interim payments. The representatives also approached the contractor (Excelo) about the removal of a wall in the building, Excelo said that the wall was load bearing and could not be removed but the representative concluded…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays