Preview

William The Conqueror's Importance in History

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
427 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
William The Conqueror's Importance in History
Why did William the Conqueror believe he had a right to the throne?
William the conqueror believed he had the right to the throne seeing as he had been promised it.
This all started with Edward the Confessor. Edward became Saxon king of England from 1042 – 1066. Seeing as Edward had no natural heir to his throne, when he died in 1066, Harold Godwineson, a strong Saxon noble leader succeeded him as king.
This angered William, duke of Normandy (conqueror) seeing as he had been promised the throne by both Edward and then Harold, yet he had been cheated. This is why William the conqueror believed he had the right to the throne.

Why is William the Conqueror such an important figure in history?
William the conqueror is such an important figure in history seeing as he introduced a new order in England. He had also ended the conflict between the Danes and Saxons by establishing himself as king.
William was a conquering leader so because of this he was able to execute his own form of rule and order over his new kingdom, in this case England. Seeing as he spent little time in England, William had to organise an order or system of government that would still allow him to govern England without anyone getting powerful enough to challenge the role of an absentee king. From this came the system of Feudalism.
Before William had conquered and set up the Feudal arrangement in England, they had no proper established government. Because of this they were constantly being attacked by Vikings and other ‘barbarians’ plus they didn’t work in harmony with each other as it was. So, this system of Feudalism was very significant to England and William.
Feudalism was a system of loyalty and trust. It worked like this:
Monarchs were loyal to lords and vice versa.
Lords were loyal to knights and vice versa.
Knights were loyal to both lords and peasants.
Lords were also loyal to peasants.
Peasants were loyal to lords and knights.

When we think about it, all these loyalty and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In 1016, Cnut of Denmark invaded England. He eradicated all opposition in a pogrom in Winter 1017, and ruled thereafter with a combination of Danes and newly promoted English Earls who profited from the Danish Conquest. Edward (the Confessor) fled to his father-in-law in Normandy. He finally regained the throne in 1042.…

    • 9305 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It was an honor to fight for Duke William's right to be crowned King in the battle of Hastings on the 14th of October 1066. The battle of Hastings was one of the most memorable and successful battles that I have ever participated in as a Norman soldier. The Duke of Normandy, William, prepared for the battle against the King of England, Harold, months in advance. It all started after the death of King Edward, the Confessor died the 5th of January 1066 without an official heir to the throne (BBC, 2011). The day after King Edwards death, Harold claimed the throne to be King Harold II of England, illegally. Once Duke William heard of this news, he set out to gather his army and seek the approval of the Pope to become England's next rightful King.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Edward VI died in 1483, there was debate as to who was most suited to take up his position on the throne. It has been argued that Richard, Duke of Gloucester had himself set on usurping the throne from the rightful heir Edward V, as soon as his brother died. Others argue that it was never the case that his immediate wishes were to seize the throne; actions after his brother’s death led him to this decision. There is evidence for and against to support the principal statement.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Duke of Normandy was born around 1028. He was the victor at the battle of Hastings and was known to be William the Bastard and William the conqueror by his enemies. William became the king of England in 1066, December 25. When he was about 9 years of age, he inherited power on his father’s death and faced many challenges. He ruled England until his death, which was in 1087.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William I, also known as William the conqueror, and William the bastard, was confident that God and the Saints were backing him up. Harold's army was exhausted from the March south so they didn't fight as well. The fighting began around nine that morning. Because the English use the shield to protect themselves it was so packed tight that the dead couldn't even fall to the ground because there was no room at all.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Firstly, Henry and Wolsey depended on the nobles to be War leaders between 1511 and 1514 which is when England went to War against France, and also in 1522 when War broke out with France again. Also, effective control of the country’s outlying regions depended on their cooperation. In the North Midlands and the North West, for example, the government was heavily dependent on the power of the earls of Derby and Shrewsbury, while in the west, the power of the earl of Devon and the Marquis of Dorset was crucial in assisting Henry to maintain royal power. Good order on the borders with Scotland was equally dependant on the good will of Lord Darce and the Earl of Northumberland.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    then came Edward IV who was a strong king that sorted out the mess that Henry VI had left behind.…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although CharlesⅡ never went to the extremes of his predecessors, he still was a believer in the Divine Right of Kings, giving him, in his mind, full power over England. All in all, though CharlesⅡ was not a bad ruler to fix much of Englands problems, he still kept the beliefs of his father. As said by Judge Blackstone, The constitution of England had arrived to its full vigour, and the true balance between liberty and prerogative was happily established by law, in the reign of King Charles the SecondJamesⅡ, unlike his brother CharlesⅡ, was just like his father. JamesⅡ believed, to the extreme, in the Divine right of Kings. Along with his previously stated belief, JamesⅡ also believed in Absolute Monarchy and was a devote Catholic. These three beliefs caused JamesⅡ to be very much disliked by parliament, and therefore, the people. After putting up with two years of his reign, Parliament finally called in Mary, JamesⅡprotestant daughter, and William of Orange, her husband, to come and force JamesⅡ to abdicate the throne. This change was welcome. Although JamesⅡ and his descendants, who are known as the Jacobites, tried to reclaim the throne they never…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William was able to employ many different forms of the existing Anglo-Saxon English government and use them differently to his advantage. William was able to utilize the predominantly Norman royal household (remaining from Edward the Confessor’s reign), which was already the centre of government and develop this further by rewarding any Normans who had advised or helped during his conquest of England, therefore increasing the number of people from Norman origin in his court. By doing this William was able to surround himself with trusted advisors. This itself was not a complete turnaround as there had already been a strong influence of Norman culture in the royal household of Edward the confessor, who himself had been born in Normandy.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade Vs Manorialism

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Each of the english monarchs had grown more and more power. William tightened the iron fist by creating feudalism 2.0, the domesday book, and built plenty of castles. Henry I followed suit, establishing the exchequer and creating traveling judges to try courts, then Henry II, started a 12 man jury and allowed nobles to buy their way out of becoming a knight. So when Henry II died and left his son, John, to the throne, it seemed natural that the king's power would continue to grow...well not exactly this time (sorry King John). Nobody really liked King John. He was always trying to increase taxes, including illegal church taxes and noble's taxes, and inevitably lost most of England's french land ( AU REVOIR JOHNNY). Usually, the…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Saxon King, Edward the Confessor, last of the ancient House of Wessex, died childless on on the stormy night of 4th -5th January, in the momentous year of 1066. On his deathbed Edward was said to have willed his throne to his brother-in-law, Harold Godwineson, Earl of Wessex, having made a previous promise to his maternal cousin, William, Duke of Normandy, that he should inherit the English throne if he died without producing an heir. The Witangemot or Saxon council of wise men, duly elected Harold as King, a decision that was met with fury by Duke William. King Harold II was hastily crowned at the newly consecrated Westminster Abbey on 6th January, 1066.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Middle Ages

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Going back to talking about with the Magna Carta. They king was over extending his power so the nobles wrote themselves a…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King Edward the Confessor had spent a few years in exile in Normandy before his accession to the English throne in 1042. Along with his life expertise and with the Anglo-Saxon nobility, he created the Witan (Council) to advise and carry out his instruction. Once William of Normandy became king he didn't change the format of this Council, however only its leaders from Anglo-Saxon to Norman. William realised that for the invasion to succeed, he required to keep the maximum amount continuity to Anglo-Saxon life as possible. The administrative frameworks of England and Normandy were run in very similar methods, therefore there was very little change required to a country that was wealthy in agriculture, coin and population. England had become the…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1066 - Essay

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After his coronation as king of England, William introduced the feudal system. Indeed, ruling both English kingdom and Duchy of Normandy, William couldn’t make it himself, especially when he had to return to Normandy to maintain his control over the land. That’s why he divided up England into very large plots of lands, which were given to the noblemen who had fought bravely for him in battle. In terms of the Feudal system, these noblemen were called tenants-in-chief. To grant these lands to his…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Were the Normans?

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the absence of Godwin. William, the duke of Normandy, paid a state visit to England in1052 A.D. Edward had no son. So, William latter…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays