Preview

Why I Don't Believe in God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
597 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why I Don't Believe in God
Why I Do Not Believe in God
In this paper, I will formally and philosophically discuss the arguments posed by Thomas Aquinas and use my own personal opinions and experiences to explain my disagreements with Aquinas and why I do not believe in the existence of God. Whether or not God exists is an argument that has been ongoing since some of the earliest philosophers took it up hundreds of years ago. Many philosophers have stated arguments on this topic, from Thomas Aquinas to David Hume to St. Anselm. To this day, it is one of, if not the most, debated topics.
St. Thomas Aquinas is a noted philosopher known for his empirical arguments for the existence of God. Though Aquinas posed many arguments in favor of this, I will discuss and explain the teleological argument. This argument is built upon the idea that many things in the world which we live exhibit order and standards. Aquinas asserts that where there is a high order such as these, there must be a superior designer or creator who established and enforces such an order. According to Aquinas, this is whom we refer to as God.
My issues with Aquinas’ argument most closely follow those of David Hume, the later philosopher who criticized Aquinas’ assertions. If God were a perfect creator, he would want to create a perfect world for his creatures to live in. An omnibenevolent God would not want evil to exist, and yet it does through both evil actions of people and natural evils such as hurricanes, tornadoes, and other natural disasters. Additionally, many natural laws exist that can have negative effects on mankind still exist (such as falling from the effects of gravity), and we are exposed to these effects despite supposedly having a God who is omnibenevolent and omnipotent. In addition, it does not seem to make sense that God would not create every creature perfectly, rather than have some be superior than others.
Though I was raised in a Christian household and attended church frequently while growing up, my
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Examine the key strengths of the Design Argument in proving the existence of God
    • 1175 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Examine the key strengths of the Design Argument in proving the existence of God

    Aquinas also presented an argument to support design qua purpose. Similarly to Paley, he argued that all natural occurrences show evidence of design. He claimed that this suggested there is a being which directs all things, and as humans have knowledge this being must also be knowledgeable. Therefore there is an intelligent being that directs everything towards its purpose, and Aquinas stated that this being must be God. Unlike Paley, Aquinas explained that God is a designer at work who continues to direct us towards our purpose as well as regulating the universe (e.g. the planets and the seasons). He also attempted to explain how free-will plays a part in design, claiming that we are programmed to reproduce but free-will allows us to choose who we reproduce with. Through these points he also demonstrated a key aspect of the design qua regularity side of the Teleological Argument.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Summary Of Aquinas For Armchair Theologians By Timothy Renick
    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary Of Aquinas For Armchair Theologians By Timothy Renick

    The age-old problem of the existence of evil and the question of free will is not just a modern-day exercise for theologians. Aquinas addressed these issues in his day and age and author Timothy Renick, in Aquinas for Armchair Theologians, provides a quite excellent explanation of how Aquinas attempted to answer the fore-mentioned issues. This paper will review Renick’s endeavor to enlighten us on how Thomas Aquinas’ answers to evil and free will are foundational to theology. The first question Renick addresses is the one of evil’s existence. To understand Aquinas, one must hold the Biblical account of Genesis as true.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aquinas Idea Of God: A Comparative Analysis
    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page

    Aquinas Idea Of God: A Comparative Analysis

    The idea of God is intense, as both of these analyses have shown. Aquinas’ idea of God is “Ipsum esse subsistens,” or Subsistent Act of Existing Itself (Magee, 2015). To speak of God as a self-subsistent being is to say He “Just Is.” He articulates every creature is “fundamentally composed of essence and existence.” In order for everything to exist, there must be a First Cause and Aquinas says God is that cause because without it, nothing exists. God is infinite simplicity and perfect. Aquinas and Tillich both see God as Being Itself (Fesser, 2011). Tillich places God “above God.” He writes, “God does not exist.” However, this is not in an attempt to deny God, but to demonstrate that God transcends everything.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Outline the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God (21)
    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Outline the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God (21)

    Aquinas' main argument is well known as 'Aquinas' third way'; the argument from contingency and necessity. The first of Aquinas' ways was 'from motion,' this follows the idea that all objects move and a change of quality is movement. Nothing can move itself, which then leads to the idea of a chain of movement but the chain cannot be infinate, therfor there must be an unmoved mover to begin the chain. This first mover is God. The second of Aquinas' ways was 'from efficiant causes,' this follows the idea that all things are caused by something else because they cant cause themselves or they would exist before themselves. However this would mean that there cant be an infinite chain of causes, meaning there must be a 1st cause that caused all causes, then this 1st cause is God. The third of Aquinas' ways is 'from contingency and…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Collins And Rowe's Argument For The Existence Of God
    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Collins And Rowe's Argument For The Existence Of God

    The question of whether there is a God has been debated by many philosophers, religious experts, and even your average citizens. Many of those people have attempted to argue why God is or is not real. This paper is going to present two different arguments by the philosophers: Robin Collins and William Rowe. The first argument by Collins is an argument for the existence of God, who designed our incredibly complex universe. The explanation of Collin’s argument will be followed by Rowe’s argument against the existence of God, which is in relation to intense suffering that exists in this world. With those two arguments at hand, the question is, are the conclusions compatible?…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aquinas' 3rd Way
    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aquinas' 3rd Way

    Aquinas' third way argument states that there has to be something that must exist, which is most likely God. He starts his argument by saying not everything must exist, because things are born and die every single day. By stating this we can jump to the conclusion that if everything need not exist then there would have been a time where there was nothing. But, he goes on, if there was a time when there was nothing, then nothing would exist even today, because something cannot come from nothing. However, our observations tell us that something does exist, therefore there is something that must exist, and Aquinas says that something is God.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Philosophical Argument For God's Sake
    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Philosophical Argument For God's Sake

    Thomas Aquinas's argument for the existence of God is a deductive argument. This assessment is based on the nature of the premises in the argument. As discussed during classroom lectures, the argument's premises and conclusion can be translated as evaluate the truth value of the premises and how they support the conclusion.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Existence And Purpose Of God: The Teleological Argument
    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page

    Existence And Purpose Of God: The Teleological Argument

    The Teleological Argument seeks to establish that the universe requires specific and improbable conditions and circumstances in order to function and even more to make life possible. These conditions have to be given in a specific and simultaneous way so that everything we know may exist.This argument try to establish, through rational evidence,the intelligence and purpose of a God, manifested in the design, function, and consummation of all things in creation. It declares that a designer must exist since the universe and living things exhibit design marks in the order, consistency, unity and model of each one of them. For this, they must have been designed by a great designer or a…

    • 113 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Teleological Essay Philos
    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Teleological Essay Philos

    The original teleological argument was developed by Aquinas in which he used his fifth way to prove the existence of God. The teleological argument is an a posteriori argument which looks at design in our world in order to prove God’s existence. Aquinas’ fifth way stated that everything operates as to a design, this design being God. Aquinas developed this to say that this operative design follows certain natural laws and therefore God is necessary to provide purpose and cause to these laws.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ontological Argument Strengths
    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ontological Argument Strengths

    Thomas Aquinas. Again, he believed in God but disagreed with Anselm’s argument proving his existence. Aquinas raises questions about God’s self-evident existence. He claims that things can be self-evident in two ways: in itself and both in itself and to us; even though something may exist self-evidently in itself, this self-evidence may not be known to us as humans and therefore, its existence would not be self-evident to us. This is exactly what Aquinas proposes God to be. God is self-evident in himself because he is his own essence. However, seeing as this essence is unknown to us (as we do not know enough about him), the statement ‘God exists’ is not self-evident to us. This, again, is another criticism which holds weight against the Ontological Argument, highlighting a glaring weakness in its…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosophical Arguments For The Existence Of God
    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philosophical Arguments For The Existence Of God

    Evaluate the arguments for the existence of god There are three main philosophical arguments for the existence of god; the Teleological argument (also known as the design argument), made by William Paley, which presents the central idea that the universe is so complex, perfectly designed and purposeful that it must have had an intelligent designer, the Cosmological argument, made by Thomas Aquinas, which is based on the main idea that everything has a starting point so an uncaused god must have made/caused the universe, and the (entirely a priori) Ontological argument, made by Anselm, based on the main idea that god is perfect, and that existence is a predicate of perfection so therefore God must be real both in our minds and reality as he…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Teleological Argument
    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Teleological Argument

    Examine the fundamental concepts of the teleological argument The foremost concept of the teleological argument revolves around the idea that the world is designed, suggesting that there is evidence of design in the universe to prove God’s existence, hence it argues a posteriori. The argument holds inductive reasoning, specific examples in the universe are generalised to maintain a broad conclusion. The argument promotes the idea that the world is too complex and well ordered to have been produced by chance or random change. The word ‘teleological’ derives from the Greek word ‘telos’, therefore the argument concentrates on the idea of purpose and order in the universe.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Cosmological Argument
    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cosmological Argument

    St. Thomas Aquinas presents one of the earliest teleological arguments in his Summa Theologica. Aquinas argues that anything with knowledge moves toward and end or cause. But, natural bodies, or planets, do not have knowledge and they still move toward an end. By an end, Aquinas means that the planets take the same path of orbit around the sun. Thus, Aquinas argues, if an unintelligent body is moving toward an end, it must be directed by an intelligent being. This intelligent being must be God (Aquinas, Summa Theologica, Article 3, Question…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Ontological Argument Analysis

    This particular argument is also in favor if the idea that God does in fact exist, but Aquinas has a different explanation from Anselm. Thomas Aquinas presents the argument known as the “Cosmological” or “first cause”. In a few words, this means that Aquinas believes there must have been a first cause in the world. Aquinas argues that the proof of Gods existence is based on the basis of experiences. God must exist because every being that is dependent for existence was caused by something else that happened prior to it. He believes either there is a boundless chain of contingent beings that is extending backwards or there is a first cause, something that was not caused by something else but began everything else. But in reality, there cannot be a continuous chain extending backwards. Therefore; there is a first cause, something that was not caused by anything else but started everything else that currently exists. Aquinas claims the existence of God can be proven in five ways: Argument from motion, Nature of efficient cause, possibility and necessity, gradation, and Governance of the world. Aquinas gives us an argument that is not hard to interpret. There must have been one who created mankind, constructing the world one being at a time. It is very easy to go along with the idea that there is one person or thing that created everything else. While this argument is clear and…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Agnosticism - 1
    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Agnosticism - 1

    Thomas Aquinas is a firm believer of the existence of a god; He argues for the proof of god by his five proofs. For motion to take place, something must have caused it to move, every effect has a cause, Something that doesn’t exist cannot make something come into existence, a standard of living, and all beings considered unintelligent half to be led some something. For his first “proof of God” Aquinas argues that any motion that takes place requires something to cause it to move. For example a ball won’t move, unless a slope causes it to roll down a hill, or a child kicks it. So the ball always had the potential to move, but its potential cannot be reached unless something acts upon it. By this theory something had to start the movement of the universe, which the only first mover could be God. In his second proof Cause and effect is brought into play. It is very similar to his first proof in that nothing would happen unless something caused it to happen. And because an infinite series of cause and effect is irrational, there must be an original cause that requires no cause; Hence God. The third proof deals with being or not being. All things have the possibility of existing or not existing. The shirt that you are wearing now exists but there was a time when it did not. Aquinas’s argument is that for that something to go from not being to being, there had to be an original being to create it. For example the shirt that you wear had to be created in a factory; And to manufacture something you must “be”. So…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics